Preview

should smoking be banned in all workplace?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
471 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
should smoking be banned in all workplace?
Name : Thuy Linh Mai
Class : English ‘16 Smoking ban

Smoking ban in almost all work places and public areas has made hotly debated issue of late. While many people approve of this legislation, some take issue with it for fear of their freedom being restricted. Nevertheless, from my personal standpoint, I am convinced that banning smoking has its pros and cons for the reasons illustrated below.

On the one hand, it is irrefutable that cigar prohibition protects human’s health. To demonstrate, when having fewer chances of smoking, people, both smokers and non smokers, can avoid critical diseases, particularly lung cancer and ingesting blockage. Additionally, it may also prevent working environment from being spoilt, especially beneficial for non smokers, who find it impossible to concentrate sitting in smokes. A further point worth mentioning is by this ban we can reduce dramatically the rate of frequent absentees, when workers have to go out puffing a cigarette and therefore decrease work outcomes’ quality. On the whole, should prohibition against smoking in place, it will benefit not only smokers, non smokers’ health but also their working productivity.

On the other hand, there still are some drawbacks luking in this new set of law. In smokers’ viewpoints, it is human’s right to decide to smoke wherever they want. Furthermore, if heavy smokers are kept from smoking for too long, chances are that it will render them unable to get down to work, not to mention being irritable and awkward to their colleuges. Last but not least, prohibiting people from smoking in offices, where they are for most of their waking time, threatens a dramatic drop in tobacco industry ‘ sales, which is contributing a large amount of money to taxations.

Nonetheless, cigarette ban, in my view, is too strict and not utterly satisfactory in some cases. This is because there are many people who work alone in an office, which, in turn, means

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ban on Hiring Smokers

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe there shouldn’t be a ban on hiring smokers because if you really think about it majority of today’s society does smoke. There will be many places that would be underemployed because there won’t be enough people out there to hire because they smoke. If they want to smoke there needs to be a designated place for them to smoke and they either A need to bring a change of clothes to smoke in or B just don’t smoke while working. The change of clothes could be used because the smell of the smoke stays in the clothes and say they are taking care of a patient who has asthma, well the smoke smell on the clothes wouldn’t be good for the patients and there is nothing that covers up the smell of smoke once on your clothes or in your hair. So therefore I think there should not be a ban on hiring smokers.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people debate over where government intervention is appropriate and personal freedom should begin. One of these highly discussed topics is banning smoking in public places. The ban of smoking in public has many advantages and reasons. Smoking in public puts innocent adults, teenagers, and children at risk of serious health problems. If smoking is banned in public, this may help lower rates of potential smokers and current smokers as well. The welfare of the nonsmoker and the smoker are both affected by allowing smoking in public. By banning smoking in these areas, the population would be positively influenced.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I've got to give it to you for getting your ideas together and for coming up with a very compelling writing essay. The points you brought out are quite strong and persuasive enough to be considered as main factors in banning smoking in the workplace.…

    • 57 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The health effects of smoking in the workplace are well-known and recent studies have proven not only first hand smoking to be dangerous, but passive or second hand smoke to be just as, if not more dangerous. This is why I believe smoking should be banned both inside and outside of the workplace.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerianpaper

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Smoking cigarettes can cause lung problems. Both first-hand and second-hand smokers are affected by cigarette smoke. Scientific findings and researches show that the chemicals in cigarettes, apart from the smoke, can lead to health problems such as lung cancer. Smoking cigarettes should be banned in public places. In public places, more people, both young and old, can be exposed to the smoke from cigarettes. My position differs from those who might say that smoking altogether should not be banned. My position is that smoking in public places should be banned. It does not include smoking in private places like homes. Smoking in public places should be banned because it poses health risks to individuals who are non-smokers and who do not want to inhale the fumes from cigarettes. The risks are double to those who already have lung ailments.…

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shari Johnson Smoke Break

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By companies banning their employees from smoking can infringe on the employee’s right to of privacy. This right…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Substance abuse

    • 974 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since people smoke everyday they bring their nasty habit to work you can smell it on their clothes and when you walk outside for a break. Every workplace is entitled to have a smoke free workplace for their employees. This rule is existence with state and local governments. Some benefits to keep the workplace smoke free would be they would not be exposed to it at work. Smokers that are willing have a better chance at trying to quit will have an easy chance by not breathing it and wanting a cigarette each time. The employer may have the healthcare costs reduced which shows that the company cares. The employee may less likely to miss work because of smoke related illnesses. The office equipment will last longer such as the carpet and furniture. Here is a brief policy for companies to go by to make sure their workplace is smoke free. No smoking of tobacco products of any kind. The manager has the final say on the designated smoking area outside of the building. This designated area will remain 20 feet form the entrance. All materials used including cigarette butts and…

    • 974 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smoking vs. Non-Smoking

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In recent years the prohibition of smoking in or on college campuses, places of business, and healthcare facilities has increased dramatically. Some employers are going as far as firing people for smoking even in their own cars or simply smelling like smoke. More and more non-smokers and healthcare professionals have began calling for a ban on the production and sale of cigarettes. I believe outlawing the production and sale of cigarettes may cause more problems than it would help solve. Three important points that are typically pushed aside are: smoking is a choice banning it completely takes away your personal freedom of choice; Outlawing cigarettes may not fully dissolve the problem people will find a way to do it regardless; Banning cigarette sales may have a greater negative impact on our already struggling economy.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For several decades, smoking remains one of the most common and most unhealthy of human habits. Smoking, specifically in public, had generally been regarded as a personal choice that bystanders had little control over. Now for the first time, the act of public smoking is becoming regulated, even restricted in many cities worldwide. The city of Columbia has recently implemented a ban on smoking in efforts to reduce the negative effects of smoking on employees and customers of restaurants and bars. The issue is that smoke directly affects everyone in the vicinity of a public place, restaurant or bar. Based on the evidence that a ban on smoking prevents secondhand smoke, deters the unhealthy habit of smoking, does not affect business in similar cities, the city of Columbia should retain its ban on smoking in restaurants and bars.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abstract: Second hand smoke exposure is a considerable risk to the nonsmoker in today’s society. Despite the unpleasantness of the smoke overall, there are also serious and well known health risks that coincide with smoke inhalation. Stricter tobacco laws are the only way to protect the rights of the non-smokers subjected to this health hazard.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been some debate recently about whether smoking should be banned. Smoking has been considered a controversial issue recently due to many negative effects bring from it. Deborah Arnott, in her article “Legislation to ban tobacco will save thousands of lives” (Guardian, September 2009) suggest that smoking should be banned in all public places and in private as well. While David Hockney ‘s article, entitled “ The anti – smoking bigots should butt out “ (The Guardian Online, September 2008) takes the opposite view : smoking should not be banned . This essay will critically respond to both of these articles.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three parties are hurt when the government decrees that no eating establishment can allow smoking. First, it negatively affects the right of the tobacco users who wants to smoke at their favorite spot. Next it takes away the freedom of business owners to choose how they will conduct business and how they will meet the interest of their customers. Third, it affects nonsmokers as occurred in Las Vegas Nevada where smoking was outlawed but it failed to have the desired effect of halting smoking. Owners of eating establishments were forced to stop providing a separate smoking area; in practice the business owners didn’t chase out customers who smoked in the place of business. It was a challenge to enforce and it…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prohibition of public smoking should be taken into consideration. It is a danger to society and no one should be permitted to smoke in public places. Not only does secondhand smoke risk the lives of other people, but firsthand smoke can cause problems for the smoker and give them a bad image. The smell of smoke is terrible and sticks to clothing. Public smoking is unnecessary and should not be accepted into communities.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2000 the idea of smoking ban laws was in action. The three venues of a bar, restaurant, and workplace were chosen because they are the major source for second hand smoke exposer for non-smoking employees and public. States around the United States were debating whether they should ban smoking in public areas. “Before Delaware passed its smoke-free law in 2002, no state had adopted a comprehensive law making private workplaces, restaurants, and bars smoke-free” (“State Smoke-Free Laws for Worksites, Restaurants, and Bars --- United States, 2000”).…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In turn, may cause the company to suffer layoffs furthering its negative reputation. Looking at both sides of the spectrum, I can understand why a company would want to forbid smokers from joining their workforce. They cost the company in health care expenses, they have higher absenteeism, decrease in productivity due to breaks and their smoking residues may discomfort patients (Noe et al., 191). Though these are all valid reason to rid smoking from the organization, I don’t believe having a policy which forbids these individuals to work will provide the greatest good. This policy blocks talent and ability from entering the company. These workers with special abilities are the ones who can save lives and make a breakthrough in clinical research. Having this type of skill on board helps the most people and this should be what companies look at. Yes, saving money is important, but if they want to save money they can do this through other means and not put patients health at risk. A company could save money developing a policy which states no breaks can be taken for smoking, or better yet, they could ban smoking at the…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays