It is a psychological fact that the more something is prohibited, the more people are likely to want it, and in this case, teenagers are more drawn to drink alcohol when they are not allowed to, leading to a risk of over intoxication. As it is noted by Dwight B. Heath, an anthropology professor at Brown University, “the younger children are when they start drinking, the safer they go about it” (qtd. in “Colleges Support Drinking Age). This means that if teens are allowed to drink at a lower age, they would less likely abuse the consumption of alcoholic beverages as it will be nothing new to them. In addition, lowering the drinking age would protect teens from malicious people selling alcohol to them. In “Why Colleges Should Support a Lower Drinking Age,” it is argued that alcohol obtained illegally could be “laced with other dangerous substances” if obtained from strangers. Thus, it would be safer to allow teens to purchase alcohol than to expose them to danger. Taking these points into account, it is better to allow young people to lawfully obtain alcohol than to be at risk of the …show more content…
Several Europeans countries that do not fallow a strict law on the drinking age have shown that lowering it can be beneficial. In her article, “Lowering the Legal Drinking Age Will Reduce Alcohol's Allure”, Ruth Daily, a staff writer for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, notes that a “recent European Union study reveals that the countries where moderate daily drinking is the norm (Italy, Spain and France) have the fewest binge drinkers (2 percent, 2 percent and 8 percent, compared to 34 percent in Ireland and 27 percent in Finland)”. This evidence further adds to the notion that if drinking is allowed, teens can learn to manage their drinking habits and learn how to moderately consume