Preview

Should There Be Utilitarianism Morally Equitable?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
667 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should There Be Utilitarianism Morally Equitable?
Living a day as a utilitarian was difficult but manageable. It would have been significantly harder if I had to do it for the rest of my life. Perhaps it was manageable because I wore the mask of utilitarianism for a day and knew that it would only be for a single day. Utilitarianism believe “an action is morally right if and only if it does more to improve oval well-being than any other action you could have done in the circumstances” (Shafer-Landau 115). This theory is not always equitable because there is no true way to measure happiness, it demands selflessness at all times, and does not respect someone’s rights at times. Although this theory is not equitable at times, it does benefit a greater number of people.
My first ethical decision was made on early Sunday morning as I was getting ready to go to
…show more content…
I am the only one in the house who has to sleep early due to my early morning classes. The night before, I was trying to catch up on my sleep but was unable to because of the loud music that was roaring through the house. Accordingly, I was faced with a minor ethical problem: should I wake up my housemates, by playing loud music while I take a shower, and take my revenge, or should I quietly get ready and leave the house, allowing my housemates to sleep peacefully. If I were to wake up my housemates by playing music, I would gain satisfaction knowing that they did not get a good night’s sleep; Therefore, I would gain my revenge for keeping me awake during the night before. On the other hand, If I let my housemates sleep, they would be happy because they would wake up naturally feeling refreshed. In the first situation, it would bring me pleasure to wake them up but would leave my

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    I will first explicate on the theory of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory which states that that which is right is what brings the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest maximum number of people. The act that manages to fulfill this criteria is the act that is then morally right. As a result, whenever we consider what is a morally right action to do, we have to keep in mind that the action that would make it so that the accumulated level of happiness in the majority would be higher than the accumulated number of unhappiness in a majority. As well, utilitarianism is bias-free, in that the happiness levels of your close friends and family do not take priority over the happiness levels of the neighbors next door, or of people in countries that you have never visited and will never…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism”, Louis P. Pojman explained the grounds on which utilitarianism has been attacked and showed some possible response to its defenders which imply his positive attitude towards utilitarianism [1] . In order to argue that thesis, Pojman’s one important premise is the response to the no-rest objection. He believed that the agent should aim at maximizing his or her own happiness as well as other people’s happiness and is best not to worry much about the need of those not in our primary circle.[1] .…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    On this topic of gay marriage I’ve chosen the two ethical theories of utilitarianism and the Kantian ethics theory. On the pro side the utilitarianism theory plays a huge role when referring to this topic. Some may argue that it is constitutional and some may say that it just isn’t the right thing to do in this country. With this theory the actions are said to be judged in terms of promotion of human happiness. If someone is happy why it should matter what the law or government thinks. It’s important in addition with this topic because gay marriage is something that has been going on for a couple years now. The news and media has made it obvious, and with this argument there are two sides. Should gay marriage be acted upon as something normal…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The theory of Utilitarianism was first developed by Jeremy Bentham who was a philosopher of the 18th century. Bentham developed this theory to create a modern and rational approach to morality which would suit the changing society.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Utilitarianism theory supports individual capability to foresee the costs of an act. A Utilitarian considers the decision of giving the best profit to a large number of people; this is known to be ethically correct.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a teleological theory which looks at the consequences of an act to decide whether it is right or wrong. There are lots of strengths to utilitarianism and not many weaknesses. One of the strengths is that it is a theory which established whether something was good or bad according to the majority of people. Bentham came up with this theory and it is known as the principle of utility. Bentham said ‘Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them to point out what we shall do’. This is the foundation for the principle of utility and it is a strength to utilitarianism as pleasure and pain can determine how people act. Bentham also said the aim of utilitarianism is ‘the greatest good of the greatest number’ and he used the Hedonic Calculus that he created to measure how good an act is and how many people it will affect, this is a major strength of utilitarianism because it tries to please everyone and each individual is equal. A weakness of Bentham’s view was noticed by Mill, Mill said it failed to differentiate humans from animals as animals can share the same pleasures that humans have, so this make human beings equal to animals. Mill also said that Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus was a weakness as it was too impractical as to use it you have to think of the; purity, intensity, certainty, extent, duration and fecundity of an act. In some situations this would be pointless as there might not be time to complete the Hedonic Calculus. For example is your house was on fire and you only had time to save either you cat or your dog you would not be able to think through the Hedonic Calculus as by the time you have your house would be burnt to the ground. This is a weakness to Bentham’s theory but not to utilitarianism because you can still please the majority without looking at the Hedonic Calculus every time you want to complete an act.Bernard…

    • 517 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is amongst the most famous moral theories to argue social issues. Developed by Jeremy Bentham, Utilitarianism is a belief that welfare and happiness should be maximized. Bentham believed that the morality of an action was determined by how much overall utility resulted from that action. Following were philosophers like include John Stuart Mill and John Rawls who mentioned that utilitarianism was a moral theory that could be used to justify inequality. Utilitarianism however is perhaps the most efficient theory to approach normative ethics. This consequential theory is understood to hold that the right action will always produce the greatest good. It is not concerned with the means to achieve the greatest good but how much good is produced. So, to refer back to Rawls’ comment, utilitarianism is a theory most commonly effective to argue against inequality since both Bentham and Mill will agree that, the action that produces ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’ will always be the right action. Because utilitarianism in all emphasizes social welfare, it is best to acknowledge that the rising income inequality in the United States is unethical.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When considering allocation of scarce resources for patients with alcoholic cirrhosis I will analyze the ethical theories of Utilitarianism and Deontology and the principles of justice, nonmalificence and autonomy. The question persists, should the fact that someone has essentially caused their own disease eliminate them from the chance of having a transplant (Williamson, 1997)? According to the utilitarian school of thought, the right action is that which has the greatest utility or usefulness (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2014). Utilitarianism is also described as a consequence-based theory which looks towards the good and bad consequences of an act to determine if it is right or wrong and are concerned about the greatest good for the greatest…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Utilitarian Ethics

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    OPTION "A" Write a 'contrast' essay dealing with the major distinction between utilitarian and deontological reasoning. Make reference to all relevant aspects of the two positions including the 'act' and 'rule' versions along with pertinent examples that clarify your answer.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The middle classes required a channel for their humanitarian passions. Unable to aid the victims of social problems such as slum dwellers, the unemployed or children in need, the plight of animals became a surrogate cause to campaign for. This lack of an alternative outlet may have resulted in a disproportionate response to issues related to animal well-being (Turner, 1946)…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two general theories of punishment: utilitarian and retributive. In the utilitarian theory of punishment, punishment is sought to discourage future occurrences of crime, while in the retributive theory, punishment is handed out because the offender deserves to be punished. Laws are used under the utilitarian philosophy specifically to maximize the overall peace of society. Because crimes and the punishment that follows are both adversaries to that peace, they should be kept to a minimum. It is understood that no truly crime-free environment exists, however, utilitarian thinkers strive to inflict only as much punishment necessary for the overall prevention of future disturbances in the society’s peace.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism Is Wrong

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First I would like to start off by defining what utilitarian mean well based off of the module a utilitarian is the person who believes in the greater good in other words a person who would take losses and justify it’s worth by the results gained from it. Now in regard to the question on how might utilitarian respond to the situation of the innocent man who was executed in order to keep the citizens from rioting. My answer to that is it would be the exact same result, because of how a utilitarian thinks. In situations like this I would guess that a utilitranian would not even hesitate to kill the innocent man, because a utilitrain would think that excuting the innocent man would be beneficial for the majority of the citizens so he would…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a recent article on healthcare, entitled Value in Cancer Care, it was announced the American Society of Clinical Oncology are proposing to provide “a tool to help patients decide if cancer drugs are worth it”. A group of doctors are proposing this tool to give people a way of measuring “what treatment will cost them and how much good it is likely to do” in making an informed decision on their care. (Marchione, 2015) The reason for this is cited as being due to the rising cost of cancer treatment and patients themselves incurring more of the costs. The original article, entitled: American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options, in referring to value states: “the definition…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill approach ethics influenced healthcare administrators because of its utilitarian principles to the realistic approach to challenge tough healthcare decisions. I believe implementing the ACA, was used the utilitarian method, because this was not an easy decision to make. In addition, ACA had to implemented to reduce medical cost in the senior population. In 2012 Medicare spent 377 billion dollars on inpatient hospital stays. Due to the increase in inpatient hospital stays, by the Baby Boomer generation, the modern-economy has experienced positive and negative outcomes (Moore, B, PhD, Levit, K, B.A., Elixhauser, A, PhD, 2015). Medicare and Social Security Administration going bankrupt—this is due to the finite federal budget…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the ethical arguments that we have seen, it is clear that a form of utilitarianism is the best option, that is, we should always do what brings about the best outcome where the outcomes are rated by the amount of good they bring about. The utilitarian argument says that in any given decision, the option that brings about the most good is the right thing to do every time. That being said, the definition of good is extremely important to the soundness of the argument. In this case, the best view of what is good is that of a hedonist, that is, a thing is good if it brings about pleasure and bad if it brings about suffering. To add to this however, I would argue that the best good outcome is the outcome which…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays