Topic: Euthanasia
Question: Should voluntary Euthanasia be legalised in Australia? Introduction:
Voluntary euthanasia has become an issue of religious, philosophical, legal and human rights in Australia. Due to the lack of awareness about voluntary euthanasia, people tend to confuse it with just euthanasia. It is crucial for today’s society to understand what voluntary euthanasia is defined as, the effects of it, the current law in Australia, and what societies role is.
Defining voluntary Euthanasia:
The term Euthanasia refers to ‘the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or if the patient is in an irreversible coma.’ 1 The word euthanasia comes from geek meaning ‘good death’. Voluntary euthanasia gives the suffering person the right to request to end their life and to die with dignity. The word Voluntary defines as someone proceeding with a certain act intentionally.
The effects of voluntary Euthanasia:
There are three categories of Euthanasia: involuntary euthanasia which refers to ending a life against the will of the person suffering, non-voluntary euthanasia which refers to the termination of life without the consent of the person and voluntary euthanasia is when a life is ended at the request of the person suffering2. Voluntary Euthanasia provides a way to relieve extreme pain, Frees up medical funds to help other people and it is another case of freedom of choice3. These are just some examples that support the fact of legalising voluntary euthanasia. Voluntary Euthanasia not only effects the patient suffering pain, however it also effects the general public.
The current law in Australia:
Several attempts have been made to legalise voluntary euthanasia in parts of Australia, however as the present laws stand, it is a crime for doctors and nurses to assist in voluntary euthanasia4. At the moment there are already political parties in Australia who support the legalisation of euthanasia, some of these parties include: Australian Greens, the Secular Party of Australia, Australian Democrats and the Liberal Democratic party5. A survey was conducted by (T Khalid, 2015), where 30 year 12 students were asked ‘should euthanasia be legalised in Australia?’ suggested that 77% of them agreed to this statement and the remaining 23% disagreed. The following graph represents the results:
Figure 1.0
Nitschke an Australian humanist believes ‘it is a fundamental human right for every adult of sound mind, to be able to plan for the end of their life in a way that is reliable, peaceful & at a time of their choosing.’6
Society’s role in voluntary euthanasia:
Society plays a major role in understanding to request voluntary euthanasia. The issue that arises from this is that as a society, voluntary euthanasia controls demographic and medical context. Another issue that arises from voluntary euthanasia in todays society, is failing to understand religious beliefs. There are many religions that forbid suicide, however the debate is that people believe voluntary euthanasia is not committing suicide, instead you are requesting someone else to do it for you. While suicide is defined as taking one's own life by one's own hands7.
Conclusion:
People suffering from disease face many difficulties in life. Society fails to understand the pain that the a person goes through, which causes the patient to suffer to death. It is important for people to understand the use of voluntary euthanasia, and to encourage the government to legalise it.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The word Euthanasia derives from the Greek words Eu and Thanatos which means easy or good death. Euthanasia is is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma[1]. Euthanasia exists in various forms, each one specific in its criteria. Firstly there is active and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia involves the use of direct action in order to end the patient’s life whilst passive euthanasia is the withholding of medical aid in order to allow the patient to die naturally such as not performing life-extending surgery or turning off a life support system. The next distinction is between Voluntary and Involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia involves the patient’s termination at their own request whilst involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient is unable to ably make a decision and therefore a suitable person makes the decision for them. Indirect euthanasia involves treating the patients pain but with the side effect of death, the primary intention is often used to justify the outcome. This is often referred to as the doctrine of double effect and in reality is not considered euthanasia given that the real purpose of the treatment is pain relief and death is merely seen as the side-affect. Finally there is assisted suicide which involves a patient incapable of committing suicide themselves asks for assistance in doing so. Euthanasia is a controversial topic that contradicts the age old moral injunction “thou shalt not kill”[2]. But similarly denying patient’s of this choice is defying medical practice cornerstones such as the patient’s autonomy and promoting their best interests. Different countries hold varying stances on Euthanasia but it is currently illegal in the UK. Most recently the case of Tony Nicklinson, a man totally paralysed by locked-in syndrome requesting euthanasia, has come to the forefront of the debate. Given the right to take his case to…
- 5500 Words
- 22 Pages
Better Essays -
Fox, Kristina. "Euthanasia, the Unresolved Issue: The Ongoing Debate in Australia - Criminal Law - Australia." Euthanasia, the Unresolved Issue: The Ongoing Debate in Australia - Criminal Law - Australia. Monaq, 7 Apr. 2012. Web. 15 Nov. 2012. .…
- 1147 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia, also known as mercy killing, is defined as putting to death someone that is suffering from a painful or prolonged illness. An individual acts on behalf of the patient to end their life by making the means of death available and serving as the agent of death. Voluntary euthanasia occurs when a patient gives consent while involuntary euthanasia is when they do not. In non-voluntary euthanasia the patient is not able to give consent. (ANA, 2013). In this paper we will discuss ethical theories and principals for our position on Euthanasia, as well as explain how these theories and principals apply to euthanasia. The impact on values, morals, and nursing practice will also be discussed.…
- 652 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
<br>When we hear the phrase voluntary euthanasia people generally think of one of two things: the active termination of life at the patient's or the Nazi extermination program of murder. Many people have beliefs about whether euthanasia is right or wrong, often without being able to define it clearly. Some people take an extreme view, while many fall somewhere between the two camps. The derivation means gentle and easy death coming from the Greek words, eu - thanatos. Euthanasia was formerly called "mercy killing," euthanasia means intentionally making someone die, rather than allowing that person to die naturally. Put bluntly, euthanasia means killing in the name of compassion.…
- 2774 Words
- 12 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia advocates Patients are constantly receiving criticism from those who believe that euthanasia is not ethical and should be illegal everywhere. Euthanasia can be defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. The practice of euthanasia is illegal in most countries. Euthanasia can be either voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia occurs when the patient requests to die. Non-voluntary euthanasia occurs when a patient is either unconscious or unable to make a choice regarding their death and an appropriate person makes this decision for them. Involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient wishes to live but is killed anyway and is considered murder. There are different…
- 991 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Furthermore, I have reasons why we can legalize euthanasia. In any condition we suffer into pain, the same as unbearable pain. For example, I can say that if I was in a car accident and i'm into pain which my conditions of pain it’s unable to be controlled then to lose the anxiety of suffer I voluntarily decide a fair way to no longer fear but easily have my death be simply melt away. With all this, by allowing people to choose how and when of their death. I consider with all that been said live what remaining life to the fullest and free from the pain of anxiety. We all have the right to decide what he/she should do with their own life. I can say this because people should not be forced to stay alive if their lives are impossible and don’t bring…
- 863 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia, formally known as mercy killing, is the act of intentionally causing the painless death of a sick person, rather than allowing that person to die naturally. In terms of a physician's actions, it can be passive in that a physician plays no direct role in the death of the person or it can be active in that the physician does something directly to cause the death (Yount, 2002). Euthanasia may also be formed into three types of act, which are voluntary, involuntary, and nonvoluntary. Voluntary involves killing the patient at his or her request. Involuntary occurs when the patient does not give consent, or refuses. Nonvoluntary is where the patient is not able to make the decision about their medical treatment so it is up to a third party to make the decision for them (Yount, 2002). Legalizing euthanasia would cause many complications because we are dealing with a very controversial issue that brings into focus some extremely powerful, conflicting, and competing values. Under the Canadian Criminal Code, active voluntary euthanasia is illegal and individuals can be convicted for 14 years for murder (Ogden & Young, 2000). Passive euthanasia has been legal because the courts have recognized the right of a patient to refuse and to terminate unwanted medical treatments. The question that remains today is whether legalizing active euthanasia in Canada could either benefit or harm not only the individuals involved, but also society as a whole.…
- 1490 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
In this presentation I’ll explain why voluntary euthanasia should be legalised in Australia when a person is suffering from a terminal illness or are already in the late stages of an illness that cannot be cured.…
- 964 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia is defined by the Oxford Dictionary (Oxford University Press, 2013) as “the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma.” The word euthanasia originates from the Greek words, “eu” meaning good, and “thantos” meaning death, however the topic of this type of “good death” has become highly debatable in Australia. Sometimes referred to as “assisted suicide” and “mercy killing,” euthanasia gives people their own right to die through painless suicide, however done so at their own free will, making it voluntary. Once legalised in the Northern Territory for nine months under the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995, euthanasia is…
- 2271 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Certain situations where Voluntary Active Euthanasia is morally permissible include; mental illness and terminal illness. The first case would be a 50 year old woman who is severely depressed with no physical illness. This woman has suffered her whole life from depression, taken numerous treatments and has failed to find a cure. From a hedonistic utilitarian perspective, “what matters is not whether the suffering is physical or psychological, but how bad it is, whether it can be relieved,” (Singer p.534). . Terminal illness is our second case. Individuals who are terminally ill will suffer for the rest of their life. An individual who has developed cancer‘s last memories will be of nothing but pain and misery, even with chemotherapy it is still not guaranteed that the individual is going to recover. Under these circumstances (mental illness and terminal illness) voluntary active euthanasia is morally permissible.# In order to follow through with the procedure with a physician, an outside source must examine the patient. The patient must be in a rational state, for example one cannot be depressed. To determine whether the person is in a rational state, they must be studied by a psychiatrist. Voluntary Active Euthanasia is morally prohibited under such circumstances as one being pressured into euthanasia or without ones consent.…
- 1009 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
1."Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide (dying) , doctor-assisted dying (suicide) , and more loosely termed mercy killing, basically means to take a deliberate action with the express intention of ending a life to relieve intractable (persistent, unstoppable) suffering. Some interpret euthanasia as the practice of ending a life in a painless manner. Many disagree with this interpretation, because it needs to include a reference to intractable suffering. There are two main classifications of euthanasia: Voluntary euthanasia - this is euthanasia conducted with consent. Since 2009 voluntary euthanasia has been legal in Belgium, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Switzerland, and the states of Oregon (USA) and Washington (USA). Involuntary euthanasia - euthanasia is conducted without consent. The decision is made by another person because the patient is incapable to doing so himself/herself"("What is Euthanasia?")…
- 690 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the most hotly debated ethical issue of our time is one of Euthanasia. Euthanasia comes from the Greek words “Eu”, meaning well or easy, and “Thanatos”, meaning death. In modern terms it is the intentional premature termination of another’s life by direct intervention or by withholding care.[1] Within that it can be either voluntary (expressed or implied consent), or involuntary. The two sides of this debate are the rights of an individual to decide when he or she is to die, or the sanctity of life and the states responsibility to protect people.…
- 2719 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Euthanasia- the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy:…
- 8113 Words
- 33 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia is “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a painless way”. The topic is controversial and its legalisation has been a topic of debate for many years. This investigation will examine the views of the Catholic Church towards the legalisation of euthanasia and discuss the agreement and/or disparity between the religious view and the contemporary, Australian secular view.…
- 947 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Background information: Euthanasia refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering. Euthanasia is categorized in different ways, which include voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia is legal in some countries and U.S. states. Non-voluntary euthanasia is illegal in all countries. Involuntary euthanasia is usually considered murder.…
- 2371 Words
- 68 Pages
Good Essays