Significance Of Inez, Estelle, And Cradeau In No Exit
The symbolic significance of Inez, Estelle, and Cradeau in Jean-Paul Sartre’s No Exit
---
Intro:
In his book Being and Nothingness, the 20th century french philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre classifies the world into three modes of being: being-for-others, being-in-itself, and being-for-itself.
The first, being-for-others, is when the self exists as an object for others. They avoid becoming their own subject to avoid self-criticism because they prefer the false reality that others give them.
The second, being-in-itself, is how inanimate objects exist- unconsciously.
These beings places themselves at the mercy of the circumstances in which they appear in.
Lastly, being-for-itself allows for true consciousness and free will. This type of being is able to determine the essence of their own existence.
These modes of being bad faith …show more content…
Estelle’s obsession with looks is inherently rooted in bad faith—she is finding meaning in her existence that can only be appreciated by beings outside the self.
One who is a being-for-others will inevitably face conflict in relationships with other people, because their reason for seeking the relationship is not for love; rather, one seeks a relationship because they find comfort and meaning in how their lover views them. A being-for-others escapes the self, the harshest critic and only basis for reality, and instead lives vicariously through their lover’s perception of them.
In No Exit, death has separated Estelle from her lover, Peter. She continues to seek him, yearning, “Peter dear, think of me, fix your thoughts on me, and save me. All the time you’re thinking “my glancing stream, my crystal girl,”(32). Estelle has no sense of self without her other half; when she does not have that other half, she is forced to reject her current situation and instead live in the past, exhibiting bad
---
Intro:
In his book Being and Nothingness, the 20th century french philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre classifies the world into three modes of being: being-for-others, being-in-itself, and being-for-itself.
The first, being-for-others, is when the self exists as an object for others. They avoid becoming their own subject to avoid self-criticism because they prefer the false reality that others give them.
The second, being-in-itself, is how inanimate objects exist- unconsciously.
These beings places themselves at the mercy of the circumstances in which they appear in.
Lastly, being-for-itself allows for true consciousness and free will. This type of being is able to determine the essence of their own existence.
These modes of being bad faith …show more content…
Estelle’s obsession with looks is inherently rooted in bad faith—she is finding meaning in her existence that can only be appreciated by beings outside the self.
One who is a being-for-others will inevitably face conflict in relationships with other people, because their reason for seeking the relationship is not for love; rather, one seeks a relationship because they find comfort and meaning in how their lover views them. A being-for-others escapes the self, the harshest critic and only basis for reality, and instead lives vicariously through their lover’s perception of them.
In No Exit, death has separated Estelle from her lover, Peter. She continues to seek him, yearning, “Peter dear, think of me, fix your thoughts on me, and save me. All the time you’re thinking “my glancing stream, my crystal girl,”(32). Estelle has no sense of self without her other half; when she does not have that other half, she is forced to reject her current situation and instead live in the past, exhibiting bad