Since these two sculptures are from different time, reasonably, the functions of them are different. For Kouros, it spoke to the god Apollo and displayed the signs of the curious soul, the acquire feeling of flexibility, and the interest of the Greek craftsmen. Moreover, it is demonstrative of this social mentality that the Kouros statues delineate not divinities or political pioneers, but rather insignificant mortal individuals who were deserving of remembrance or of endless support of their divine beings. However, Augustus of Primaporta reflects glory, power of Augustus, a political leader. And it also represents that Ancient Roma is a powerful country at that time. …show more content…
On the one hand, for Kouros from Anavysos, which was built around 540 - 515 B.C. The utilization of steel etches after 500 B.C. took into account an alternate procedure of roughing-out and cutting the stone where the etch can be held at an intense point to cut against the stone permitting thus for more flexibility of development and articulation to the craftsman's hand. Interestingly, a delicate etch against hard stone must be held opposite in respect to the surface, and should be utilized to pummel the surface gems gradually. When it came to the age of Augustus, the skill of caving statues had become more mature, however, it obtained intensely from the figure of Ancient Greece. The figure, Augustus of Primaporta, is a run of the mill case, which embraces highlights from a Greek athletic statue from fifth century B.C., the Doryphoros of Polykleitos; its head, facial development, leg and general posture. In addition, both sculptures were made with the same material of white