Preview

Similarities Between Free Will And God's Foreknowledge

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1475 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Free Will And God's Foreknowledge
Human Free Will and God’s Foreknowledge The argument of the compatibility and incompatibility of God’s foreknowledge and human free will have been going on for hundreds of years. Concerning the definition of freedom, to get a better understanding, can be described as an act that an individual can do freely without being restrained or force. Philosophers that are well known in this subject matter are Alvin Plantiga and Nelson Pike. Pike will argue that human freedom is incompatible with God’s foreknowledge based upon facts such as God being omniscient. Whereas, Plantiga argues that Pike’s theory is based upon confusion and that human free will can coexist with God’s foreknowledge. Let’s get in to the differences in predictability and God’s …show more content…
Pertaining to this situation Pike states, “ … if God held such a belief eighty years [T1] prior to [T2], Peter did not have the power on [T2] to do something that would have made it the case that God did not hold this belief eighty years later.” (Pojman & Rea 99) This fact goes on to say that it is with the omniscience of God that, no matter what, His belief will not have changed in between [T1] and [T2]. The argument can still be accepted in an statement made by St. Augustine, “… it is not necessary to deny that God foreknows all things while at the same time our wills are our own. God has foreknowledge of our will, so that of which he has foreknowledge must come to pass. In other words, we shall exercise our will in the future because he has foreknowledge that we shall do so; and there can be no will or voluntary action unless it will be in our power.” (Hopkins 112) The argument here is that, even though God foreknows that Peter will eat the apple does not require Him to limit the humans free will; It was with knowledge and not restraint that Peter made his …show more content…
This is backed up by stating that God is omniscient and because of that the action by the human is not, in fact, under his will. Due to the belief of the event occurring before the time it does occur does not allow the human any other choices. This cannot be compared to anything that is predicted as it would falsify the omniscience of God. To compare the belief of a situation occurring to the prediction a human might make of a wind-up toy or close friend is also untrue as it would then allow for anyone to be called “God” because anyone is able to make such a prediction. The previous statement would negate that only an omniscient being can be called “God” since the human that can predict is not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The only discussed solution that does not hold God responsible for evil in the world is the compatibilist approach to free will. Upon formulating this solution the two major issues are on the interpretation of omnipotence and freedom.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phil 101 Questions

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages

    6. If my will is infinite (like God's), then why would I choose to think things wrongly; that is, how can error be explained?…

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fate vs. Freewill

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Reznor, Trent. "Right Where It Belongs." Rec. Sept.-Oct. 2004. With Teeth. Nine Inch Nails. Trent Reznor, 2005. MP3.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main questions that we face is whether or not, we as humans have genuine freedom. Are we free to make our own choices? Do we decide what happens in our lives in the future? Or are our lives set pathways in which we have no say at all? Are all our choices already decided? In other words, do we have free will or are our actions pre-determined, or both? Hard determinists, libertarians and soft determinists all set out to provide answers to these questions, holding different views on whether or not free will and determinism are compatible. Both hard determinists and libertarians believe that free will and determinism are incompatible but hard determinists reject the idea of free will whereas libertarians support the idea of free will and reject determinism. On the other hand, soft determinists believe that free will and determinism are in fact compatible.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When comparing one item to the other there will always be differences and similarities this is the essitanial aspect of comparing. For purposes of this paper, the two Anabaptist confessions, which will be looked at, are as follows. The New Hampshire Baptist Confession and the Free- Will Baptist Confession. The Basis of the New Hampshire Confession rests on the Calvinistic view of theology verses the Free-Will Baptist whose foundation is rooted in the Armenian aspects of theology. The very core…

    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stan Lee, creator of many of the Marvel movies, once said, “With great power there must also come… great responsibility.” Free will is like a great power that has been given to us. It can be used for good and evil. As humans, we believe that we have a choice in everything. Thus the idea of free will. But because of that choice there will always be a downside to free will.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every time I think I have grasped the concept of this statement, I come up with an even more frustrating idea. My basic understanding of this quote is that my parents had to obviously think about whether or not they wanted a child. So my parents did think about me before I was born. My more in depth understanding is that God himself had a decision committee where he stated that so and so will be born on this day. However if God did decide when I was to no longer be just a thought then he most likely also predetermined my entire life story and every path I took. Which leads me to believe that I have no control over my life and I am just a puppet being pulled by strings attached to the heavens. However, if this were true then the idea of choice would be obsolete. Since this is not the case and we do indeed have free choice before deciding upon any action, my previous theory of predetermination can't possibly be true. No matter the case I believe and hope that we all choose our own path and that God does not have a say in the…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The excerpt I chose was “Free Will versus Determinism”, and I noticed from the beginning the piece was written with reasons to support the content. First, the presentation introduces two beliefs; the behavior of atoms is governed entirely by physical law, and humans have free will. Immediately after presenting these ideas and questioning the relations in the two, the excerpt explains the logical approach to why they do not necessarily favor one another. Any argument that is presented, or comparison of two aspects, needs facts and reasons to confirm why the person is trying to convince the reader or other person that the argument is supported.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate between freewill and determinism stems from the apparent conflict between the universal rule of causality that is deeply rooted in nature, and between the apparent ability of human beings to choose between multiple courses of action in order to lead to the most desirable outcome. The universal rule of causality simply claims that inorganic matter such as tables, chairs and rocks are acted upon by whatever forces affect it, however, human beings seem to be an exception to this rule by their unique ability to ponder about how to go about making decisions in their life and which…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Free Will vs. Determinism

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Society walks about day-by-day living their lives and never really thinking or breaking down how their day unfolds or why it plays out the way it does. Some people have said that individuals have a choice and are able to decide on where their day goes. Others on the other hand would argue this assessment and state that your day and your life as whole are all pre determined. The different is free will vs. determinism. Do you believe we live in a free will world or has everything been planed out and is determined to happen no matter what? To start out on finding an answer to this question we must first break down the two terms and a bit about their background and what they mean to us as an individual walking around day-to-day living our lives.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consolation of Philosophy

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ability to know the plan for mankind and allow them to happen because they must have a purpose disproves Boethius’ belief that things happen haphazardly. If an AGAPAK God knows what’s going to happen, and sees a purpose behind them, then nothing can happen by chance. It’s impossible for chance to exist if God knows the future. However, this raises questions about the existence of free…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘There seems to be a considerable contradiction and inconsistency between God’s foreknowledge and the existence of free will.’ (Boethius).…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate on free will is a complex issue that cannot simply be answered. As we know free will is an ontological issue. Each person must come to their own conclusion based on several things such as life experiences, religious beliefs, readings, and so on. Some of the readings we have analyzed in class have to do with whether or not we have free will. If there is an all omniscient God that knows everything before we do then does that mean we have free will, if God already knows what’s going to happen before we do?…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments about free will are mostly semantic arguments about definitions. Most experts who deny free will are arguing against peculiar, unscientific versions of the idea, such as that free will means that causality is not involved. These arguments leave untouched the meaning of free will that most people understand which is consciously making choices about what to do in the absence of external coercion, and accepting responsibility for one’s actions. Hardly anyone denies that people engage in logical reasoning and self-control to make…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Free-Will Vs Determinism

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The debate between free will vs determinism is important because it reflects on actions and intentions of humans, but free will brings up strong valid points supported by evidence. Free will can be simplified as a human does what they ultimately and truly want in their mind, through their own beliefs and character. Determinism is about having strong influences in an environment, that the decisions of individuals reflect off their unconscious mind. Determinism can influence decisions, but the final decision and action is up to the individual. Through past experiences a person can learn and be influenced by everything in their surroundings, but it does not force a person to make a decision based on their past. I do not believe that anything is…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays