In Tim Celek and Dieter Zander’s book, “Inside …show more content…
In a sense, they see this as a way for society to force their hand rather than allowing them to spread their wings and soar to heights in which they choose to fly. Celek and Zander state that “they see a name like ‘Busters’ or ‘Twentysomething’ (sic) or ‘Generation X’ as a stamp imposed from without by older members of the media and society.” The busters don’t like this because they contribute a lot of the problems they are facing or having to deal with the very people who are labeling them, the Boomers. So a lot of times, one will see Busters go against things a Baby Boomer proposes just for spite because of emotions spurred on by unjust labeling. This is typically where their attitude comes into …show more content…
The Busters have unbelievably high divorce rates, especially compared to the Boomers. This decline in the family unit is even seen in pop culture:
“Kurt Kobain of the rock band Nirvana was the John Lennon of his generation until he committed suicide with a gunshot blast to the head in 1994. Cobain was a reluctant spokesman. He said he wasn’t trying to speak for anyone but himself in the rage and alienation of his lyrics and said he realized that his problems were probably minor compared to others.’ “I’m a product of a spoiled America...There are so many worse things than divorce. I’ve just been brooding and bellyaching about something I couldn’t have, which is a family, a solid family unit.”
By seeing the rampant decline of the family unit and its inability to stay together, we are able to once again see the importance of learning from our history so as not to repeat it. When we accept the notion that divorce is normal, we accept that having broken and hurting families is also a