Anyone can be disobedient to the law, just like MLK Jr. and David Thoreau, but understanding and dealing with the consequences goes hand in hand. If …show more content…
Breaking the law and saying it was something that a person doesn’t agree with is not appropriate. Civil disobedience is breaking the law, because it is unjust. The law is wrong and the only way to change it would be to take a stand and change it. That is only when being civilly disobedient is acceptable. “America is not a perfectly just society, yet not all of our unjust laws invite or compel a response of civil disobedience” (“More on What…”). There should always be reasoning behind being disobedient to the law. “In sum, civil disobedience can be an effective and necessary tool for changing unjust laws that require direct obedience. It tends to be far less useful for opposing unjust laws that do not require direct obedience. And it is utterly useless as a tool for promoting injustice” (“More on What…”). Many people will take a stand for what they believe in and if the law is unjust, than it’s always acceptable to do