Preview

Civil Disobedience: Thomas Jefferson And Martin Luther King

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1749 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Disobedience: Thomas Jefferson And Martin Luther King
Thomas Jefferson, the third president and author of the declaration of independence, once exclaimed, “If a law is unjust a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.” Jefferson declares that at any cost if one finds a law wrong than it is his duty to stand against it for the common good. He implies that people should never stand idly by or blindly follow a law that is immoral only because it is the easiest way. Knowing when a protest against government is needed was also what the writers Martin Luther King, Henry David Thoreau, and Arthur Miller wanted to instruct to their readers. King was a significant activist and leader of the civil rights movement who was the cause of many amendments and progress for the rights of African Americans. His A Letter From …show more content…
King portrays what would happen if people followed a corrupt leader and allow power to grow uncontrollably; it would result in a tragedy like the Holocaust. In addition, he also acknowledges that, like the Hungarian Freedom Fighters, if you do what you believe is right then you will accomplish a positive improvement in society. Furthermore, Thoreau accentuates the importance of using your moral sense to determine whether the laws you are FOLLOWING follow your values because the first priority is to be a righteous man and then a subject to authority. Miller also contributes to this argument by disciplining his readers to never fear the cost of rebelling against the dominant opinion because that cost is worth the change their rebellion would achieve. The ability of civil disobedience is important to have because it ensures the protection of being manipulated easily by a higher power. If you do have the strength to question authority than your rights will always be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Two different writers, Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, argue that society is not at its finest and that every man has the responsibility to impact change and every many has the power to do so, only if man is an extremist for the greater good. King was a reverend but more importantly he was a dominant voice for thousands of persecuted people during the civil rights movement. From King expressing his knowledge and acting on them, he was obliged and jailed (he was obliged to jail?) within King's cell he composed a letter entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. (transition?) Thoreau was a philosopher who contained all the qualities of a transcendentalist. Much time before King’s letter, Thoreau fabricated a response to when…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin King and Henry Thoreau both write persuasive expositions that oppose majority ideals and justify their own causes. While this similarity is clear, the two essays, "Letters from Birmingham Jail" by King and "Civil Disobedience" by Thoreau, do have their fair share of differences. Primarily in the causes themselves, as King persuades white, southern clergy men that segregation is an evil, unjust law that should be defeated through the agitation of direct protesting, and Thoreau, writing to a more broad, non addressed audience, and focusing more on the government itself, contends that at its present state, with the war with Mexico and the institution of slavery, that one should do as he does and refuse to pay government taxes that support such evil practices or "traditions." While both Thoreau and King prevail in establishing a firm impression for what they strongly believe in, they each succeed in their persuasive efforts through different means. Chiefly, in the way that King draws emotional appeal with the usage of a burning passion and devotion, and Thoreau, while still making it evident that he is devoted in what he believes in, draws more emotional appeal through being more distressed and concerned than naively hopeful and optimistic. However, similarities remain to be as numerous as differences as both Thoreau and King bring credibility or ethical appeal to their assays essentially with allusions to Christ and the Bible.…

    • 969 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson was committing treason, a crime punishable by death, and he was asking his fellow countrymen to do the same. Similarly, King was asking people to follow him in breaking the law, taking the risk of going to jail or tolerating physical and verbal abuse. This, obviously, was not a simple task, but each was profoundly committed to their cause, and they never fell short of giving good reason for their strife. Both Jefferson and King used a significant amount of emotional and logical appeal, not necessarily to make their audience aware of their stance, but to sway them to feel the same and to take action. The style in which the Declaration of Independence was written was very formal and proper, and the emotional appeals are undertone to the logical facts that are stated about the tyrannical King of England. While the statement "He has...sent hither Swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their substance" was most likely meant to strike emotion in the colonists, it was stated in a very particular manner, which gave it a more logical appeal when read by one whom was not living in the colonies at that time. All of the statements made about the King placed strong emphasis on the fact that "HE" was the one responsible for these terrible acts on the colonies, and each statement was precisely constructed to appeal to different audiences in a different way. On the other hand, Dr. King is very direct when using emotional appeal. He used his greeting skillfully to disarm the clergymen who were responsible for his presence in jail, and then, to further build his character in their eyes, he says, "I feel that you are men of genuine good will and that your criticisms are sincerely set forth." As he progresses through the letter and shifts toward different audiences he uses emotional…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr., born on January 15, 1929, fought for the injustices of his brothers and sisters throughout his life. While being an active activist, Martin Luther King was imprisoned to Birmingham jail due to his participation in a nonviolent demonstration against segregation and discrimination in Alabama. During his sentence, he wrote a letter, “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” to counter the criticisms of his actions from the clergymen by claiming that “An unjust law is no law at all”(par. 12), “Injustice everywhere is a threat to justice…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Letter from Birmingham Jail, King invites Americans everywhere to fight injustice. He declares that all are obligated to work for justice, even above the law. Justice should be protected by politics in order for all people to enjoy certain basic rights.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout history, there have been many unjust laws. Many people obey laws just because they are laws. People often disagree with certain laws, but they follow it because it's socially and normally acceptable or because it's just the law. I believe that King wrote the Letter from Birmingham Jail to make his readers question and interpret whether or not a law is just. In this essay I will make the distinction between just and unjust laws according to Martin Luther King Jr' s Letter from Birmingham Jail. If a law is unjust, it is the responsibility of the people to get it overturned. A society should not live with an unjust law.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    King, Thoreau also uses appeals in his "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience." Thoreau uses emotional appeal's however they are not as evident as that of King's. Thoreau uses emotional appeal in his mention of Cesar and Christ. His logical and ethical appeals however are more so evident, and make the essay a very successful one in this aspect. "I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs least"…"that government is best which governs not at all"; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which we will have." (1) Throughout Thoreau's essay the same example is present and makes the audience think more critically which may in turn lose his reader. Thoreau's essay prolongs the real issues with unnecessary details that in turn confuses the audience on what exactly he is trying to say. Whereas Dr. King is straightforward with his details allowing the reader to read along…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) was an excellent leader and a powerful historical figure. He is often remembered most for his writings and speeches, in which he invokes many philosophical theories and speakers to justify the opinions he expresses in them. In MLK’s, “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” he uses philosophical thinkers from the past to support the idea that civil rights activists should be allowed to protest peacefully, in spite of the laws against it.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” was written in response to a public statement of concern and caution issued by eight white religious leaders of the south. His inspiration for writing the letter was the clergymen’s unjust proposals and the letter allowed him to present his rebuttal. In this letter, King explains his philosophy, which includes his views of “just laws” and “unjust laws.” He also explains his views on the morality of breaking laws , and which laws can be broken.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Luther King, Jr’s message in “A Letter From Birmingham Jail” and Henry David Thoreau’s in “Civil Disobedience” are similar with minor differences. Both men agree it is a citizen’s duty to disobey an unjust law. King and Thoreau equally manifested their ability to protest by taking a peaceful approach, also accepting the repercussions that followed. King and Thoreau are prime examples on whether one is bound to always obey the law is increasingly important during periods of grossly immoral legislation and unjust institutions. King and Thoreau believe it is a citizen’s duty to navigate through legislature with their moral compass, however Thoreau does not believe…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The overall point that Martin Luther King is making in the letter is that in order for civil rights to be achieved, the act of non-violent protests must be allowed. King believed that if non-violent methods were prohibited then tension would keep building up, and would result people being much more violent in order to let their opinions be heard. King also believed that there was no better time than that moment to fight for their rights, rather than putting it off until a ‘more convenient season’ (line 12). He thought that they should use all the time they had to fight for their freedom and put across what they believe in instead of just waiting for time to pass, hoping that change will occur naturally.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It becomes evident that within the constant adjustments in time periods come amendments of actions. An idea or question may have been portrayed differently then as opposed to the way it is portrayed now. Within an era before technology existed the only format possible to communicate an idea or issue concerning a civilization was through compelling artistic ideas, specifically during the Harlem Renaissance era. Those living within a society which is governed by unjust or immoral policies need their voices to be heard. To advance this technique, in which a civilian acts indirectly through visual communications or voiced directly through assemblies and actions, one must use civil disobedience in the appropriated situations. The evolution in which…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before taking this course, my knowledge about Thomas Jefferson was limited. I used to live in another county, and my History classes were about Simon Bolivar and Francisco De Miranda. Now, after these readings, and additional research, I could say that Thomas Jefferson was known as more than one of the American Founding Fathers; today people would call him a human rights activist. He fought for slaves seeking their freedom, and during his second period as president, he signed the Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves. However, there are inconsistent histories that make me believe that he was not against the slavery as he used to proclaim.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a democracy? Civil disobedience is a form of peaceful political protest in an active opposition to comply with certain laws considered unjust while accepting the consequences. Within the history of the United States of America three instances that support that civil disobedience impacts a free society positively consist of a paper by Harris g. Mirkin known as Rebellion, Revolution, and the Constitution "Thomas Jefferson's theory of civil disobedience", Martin Luther King Jr's "Letter from a Birmingham Jail", and a related current event portraying a positive outcome of civil disobedience. "Thomas Jefferson's theory of civil disobedience" states that the men who proposed the constitution were leaders of the American Revolution and the citizens of the new Republic who had fought in the war absorbed the ideology of revolution. Jefferson the author of the Declaration of…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Black lives matter, seems like that’s always said when an unarmed black teen is killed by a white officer. In my opinion, all lives matter. God did not create all human beings with their skin color being black. All of the protests happening today are really unnecessary. It’s not right to murder someone who is unarmed, that I agree with, but what I don’t agree with is people associating a black man being murdered by a white man with racism but not associating racism with a black man murdering a white man. I don’t see white people setting up and conducting protests, acting like they don’t have any common sense every time a white man is murdered by a black man.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays