Preview

Simon is charged with the burglary of an antiques shop

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
725 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Simon is charged with the burglary of an antiques shop
Simon is charged with the burglary of an antiques shop. He has three previous convictions of Theft. He has previously complied with bail conditions. He lives locally with his wife and three children but plans to move to Spain.
Explain what factors are likely to be considered when making a decision whether or not to grant bail to Simon and what conditions may be imposed.

Nature and seriousness of offence:
Theft/ burglary is considered a triable either way offence meaning it can either be tried in the Magistrates Court or Crown Court depending on how serious the crime is. Depending on what he stole and how much it was worth, Simon’s burglary is quite serious, so he may be tried in the Crown Court. This would make it harder for Simon to be granted bail as because the offence is quite serious, he stands a reduced chance of bail being allowed. The court can refuse bail if they believe that it is done for protection of the defendant.
Previous Convictions:
Simon has three previous convictions of theft, the same crime in which he is suspected of committing now. As Simons has multiple previous convictions, the likelihood of him re-offending whilst on bail will need to be considered when deciding whether bail should be granted or not. However, the court need not grant a defendant bail if it is satisfied there are substantial grounds for believing that the defendant if granted bail would commit an offence whilst on bail- The Bail Act- 1976.
Previously complied with bail:
Simon has complied with bail conditions on a previous conviction/s. This is likely to increase his chance of being granted bail as it means he is reliable and is more likely to turn up to what he has been told to, rather than not turning up. The court will consider- the defendant’s record with respect to the fulfilment of his obligations under previous grants of bail in criminal proceedings- The Bail Act- 1976.
Family and plans for Spain:
Simon lives locally and has a wife and three children, this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bail is a term used when someone is in jail and can be granted bail to leave jail for a short…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    bus 340

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to answer the questions you will need to READ THE CASE, STUDY THE COURSE MATERIAL, SEARCH ADDITIONAL SECONDARY INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role of the court is to determine whether or not a crime has been committed and impose a sentence where appropriate. In the first instance the alleged offender will appear in the magistrates court where it will be decided whether or not to grant bail or remand in custody…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Sophonow

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas has had a criminal record due to offences that were generally minor and none that had any aspect of violence. His last conviction was several years before his arrest of the charge of murder. He had been charged with a drug offence and these charges had been withdrawn.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gregory Martin was arrested in New York City on December 13 1977, on charges of robbery, assault, and criminal possession of a weapon. He was arrested late at night, at 11:30, and lied about his address. The boy was kept overnight and brought to juvenile court in the morning for his initial appearance. His grandmother accompanied him in court.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tutorial Questions Week 3

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3 Assume that the NSW parliament wants to prohibit under-age gambling. To this extent it introduces an Act which states: “any person under the age of eighteen years who is found in the vicinity of a betting shop shall be prosecuted and liable to a maximum fine of $500.” Ian is 15 years old and decides to place a bet in a betting shop. He walks in, places a bet and begins to walk out when he is stopped by a police officer. He is questioned and told that he will be charged under the Act. Two weeks later, Ian receives a summons to a Local Court for an offence against the Act. In his defence, Ian’s counsel argues that the he is not guilty of the offence, because when he was apprehended, he was “in” the betting shop, whilst the Act prohibits underage persons being in the “vicinity”. Advice Ian on how the court might…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winship Larceny

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Samuel Winship, at the time was a 12-year-old boy who was arrested and charged as a juvenile delinquent. Winship was arrested because he broke into a woman’s locker and stole $112 dollars from her pocketbook. Winship was charged because if an adult would have stolen the money out of the pocketbook, it would be considered larceny. He was charged with preponderance of evidence, which means the defendant does nothing to defend their case.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bail Court Research Paper

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Court cannot conduct a mini trial at the time of considering a bail application.141 At the stage of granting of bail, the Court can only go into the question of the prima facie case established for granting bail. It cannot go into the question of credibility and reliability of the witnesses put up by the prosecution. The question of credibility and reliability of prosecution witnesses can only be tested during the trial.142 The Court is not expected to go deep into the probative value of the material on record in bail matters. This is to be considered and taken into account by the Trial Court at appropriate stage after evidence.143 In a case relating to allegation of torture of wife, it was contended…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5. WHAT ARE 3 FACTORS JUDGES CONSIDER WHEN SETTING BAIL – 1. How serious the alleged crime is. 2. The amount of evidence the prosecution has. 3. The likelihood that the accused will attempted to flee the area.…

    • 546 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The case of James Hardy Vaux serves as a prime example of the inefficiency and weakness in the British justice system, especially in terms of punishment. It is significant in highlighting how ineffective trials were at convicting criminals. Over his criminal career, he was trialled 4 times, and eventually transported for life. His 3rd trial is perhaps the most significant in providing an outlook on the inefficiency of the trialling system. Vaux had stolen a silver snuff box out of the pocket of a gentleman in a theatre. After leaving it with the landlady of a public house to have it refilled, he was caught picking it up again, along with the scissors he used to slit the gentleman’s pocket in his possession. Despite the large amount of evidence against him, he was found not guilty by the jury, thanks to the tactics he employed to avoid a sentence. He dressed very expensively, and acted gentlemanly, and paid for the best lawyer he could find. He swayed the jury with his demeanour. Such was common at this time, for a criminal to sway the public, bribe witnesses and even threaten the prosecutor. After 1000 trials at the Old Bailey in 1793, 562 were…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    R Vs Robert

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What is the proper citation for the case you have chosen? Who are the parties to the appeal and what is each of their role in the appeal? What category of law does the case fall into and how do you know that?…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first place, Sherlock Holmes should have thrown Ryder in jail, because stealing is stealing and a crime is a crime. If someone breaks the law, then someone should suffer the consequences whether they will like to face the consequences or not. Since Sherlock Holmes set them free, that means Sherlock Holmes also broke the law! For an example, an officer or a detective would put someone in jail for murdering someone, so that means that Sherlock should have also put someone in jail for being a theft. I think Sherlock and Ryder should both go to jail for committing an illegal crime.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stole more than $32,000, got charged for 34 offences between 2009 and 2011. Got sentenced to 2 and a half years in jail. His court hearing was held in the magistrates court.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Little Louie is charged with conspiracy because he had talked planned with Billy Bad Boy and Vince Bagadonuts.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Little Louie is charged with two counts of 5th degree felony burglary for in the Smith’s home and take his guns.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics