Preview

Sleepers Film Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
760 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sleepers Film Analysis
In “Sleepers,” Fat Mancho essentially claims that justice is violence and power outside of the courthouse. Aristotle would likely think that New York City, the setting of this film, is a perverted polis. Locke would probably call the streets of the criminal section a place where most people are in a State of War. Both ancient and modern philosophers have varying views and reactions to this quote. Aristotle thinks the best polis promotes human reason, since this is the defining characteristic of humans. Here, he would point out that reason which is the distinguishing characteristic of humans is not being used. Thus it is an unnatural and perverted polis. Morals are absent in this situation where money or status can give you unfair advantages in court and in the streets of NYC. By saying that “[justice] got eyes” infers that justice is partial. This is not a moral situation or government. Aristotle thinks morals should be the basis of a polis. A polis, according to Aristotle, allows one to live a human life. He says the aim is to live the …show more content…
It also allows inequality. Locke may wish that the citizens of New York City go back to their most basic and innocent state. To do this they would have to strip civilization of the cloak of history. The notion that one can buy justice is unreasonable to Locke, who thinks that people living according to reason is the best. If he was born in this area of NYC, he would take the freedom to leave with his property. This is because he would not be certain that he could enjoy life and his possessions in the constant fear of invasion by others with more power, money, or status. He would have a hard time living with these rights violators that even when taken into court, and into a state of civil society, it is relatively

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Field of Dreams, a film production directed by Phil Alden Robinson, is an enduring classic of its time that delves into the idyllic nature of baseball. The director’s subtle inclusion of diegetic sounds, depth cues, and the Kuleshov’s effect brings together a polished masterpiece that keeps the audience at the edge of their seats. In the film, the spirit of Doctor Archibald Graham refuses to return to Iowa with Ray despite his dreams of playing professional baseball. “Sixty-five years [before], for five minutes, [he] had come [so] close, it would kill [most] men to get so close to their dream and never touch it.” Graham chooses his present over his past and adamantly insists that “batting in the major league” is not written in his destiny. He will not leave Chisholm for it is his “most special place in the world.” His duty as a physician feels more fulfilling for “if [he’d] gotten to be a doctor for [only] five minutes… [that] would have been a tragedy.” In fact, Graham willingly accepts his fate and concedes that his sacrifice for the greater good has not been in vain.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theme of deeply ingrained values is also present in A Nightmare on Elm Street…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the film Night of the Living Dead there were many unimaginable, grotesque things that are taking place throughout the film. We know that people are afraid of two things, death and the unknown. Johnny began by badgering his sister, Barbara just like he did when they were children by saying “they’re coming to get you Barbara” while visiting their father’s gravesite. This shows that Barbara, even as an adult, she is afraid of the unknown. Unbeknownst to Johnny, Barbara was actually attacked by the unknown. Johnny jumps on “the thing” to protect his sister. This is the first sighting of a “thing”. The sighting of the thing connotes fear and death. Barbara runs off and finds safety in a house not far from the graveyard. Barbara meets Ben when he enters the house for safety as well. The house is another connotation of safety and warmth. Ben jumps right in to protection mode because Barbara appear to be in a state of shock due to the gory sighting of “the thing” and its attack on her brother.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power, Justice, and a Bunch of Dudes Arguing Power and weakness, justice and injustice, good and bad. In a world where men seek power at any and all costs, it is important to stop and consider what truly makes one powerful. In Gorgias, translated by James H. Nichols Jr., Gorgias and Polus are trapped in an argument with Socrates about the power that rhetors possess. However, through the use of allegories to justice and suffering, Socrates asserts that it is not power that these such men possess, but, rather weakness.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Locke’s’ piece, Of the State of Nature Chapter II, he emphasizes the positive views of human nature. Locke supports a no-government form of rule. He believes that man can rise above injustice and keep a fully functioning society without rule or as he puts it they can have “A State of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit…..” (Locke). If you give man the freedom to make his own decisions and choices he will make the correct ones. Freedom of choice is what is needed to keep a society intact and functioning, individuals in a society need to feel as if they are in charge of their own destiny. The natural rights of life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness are backed up by the notion of freedom and choice of…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    America made Locke’s idea less harsh by allowing people to complain to the government. The first amendment opened up the ability to change the government without overthrowing them. Locke also influenced the limited government. Petitioning the government dates back to even before America…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Locke believes that before we form civil society by consenting to establish government, we live in a State of Nature. He describes this pre-political state as,...a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending on the will of any other man. (Locke, 1980, p.81)The State of Nature is ruled essentially by human nature. Liberty, equality, self preservation, reason, and property are the most prominent principles that Locke feels are innate to humans. Locke explains how nature intended for all men to be equal,...creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same facilities should be equal amongst another... (Locke, 1980, p.8)Locke comes to the conclusion that humans are self preserving in the State of…

    • 4014 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The next part of the passage questions why a man would ever want to leave the state of nature of freedom to be controlled by a higher power. Locke makes the argument that without a higher power or form of government man’s life and property could be in danger. A government could help secure freedoms and safety. In the state of nature many things are missing including a common law, no indifferent judge to determine differences, and a power to promote law. Men must create and agree with a form of law to make mankind peaceful with one another and punish those who fail to follow the law. Freedoms need to be protected by law.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke sets out to describe how a civil government can exist and dissolve based on the laws of nature regarding men. Men are naturally free. Men are born and can gain life, health, liberty, and possessions in which they are free to reign over themselves. He argues that those who take away these rights from people should be punished.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Mid summer Night's Dream is another entry into Shakespeare's recent rebirth on film. Michael Hoffman's film does not stay true to the text, but he must take liberties to allow for this classic story to be entertaining to today's audience. In this essay I will discuss the differences between the text vision and the film vision of this story from the historical setting, the time placement, Hoffman's personal adaptations, and finally Hoffman's character adaptations. In Michael Hoffman's film of William Shakespeare's a Midsummer Night's Dream, Hoffman has made some changes to the location and historical aspects of the play. Shakespeare drew upon classical mythology, English literature, English folklore and contemporary English life. So Hoffman had to try his best to update it to today's views on mythology, folklore, and life. Hoffman's film is set in Italy, instead of Greece like in the text. Hoffman may have chosen Italy instead of Greece, because Italy overall has a universal romantic feel to it. Also Hoffman may have chosen Italy because it is much more well know to the general moviegoers. Unlike today, in Shakespeare's time Greece was the centre of classical history, and would be know to most of the people of his day. Hoffman did include a Greek theme when he invented the town of Monte Athena located in Tuscany. The town is made-up but still connects the text with Hoffman's film. For the parts of the movie that would be filmed in the woods, they had the filming done indoors at a studio. They would need room to manoeuvre people and cameras, so the real outdoors would not do. The director would not have to deal with the weather, or having enough sun light. Also the indoor setting in allowed the fairies to observe the morals, in a believable setting. So now that I have showed you the setting of the film, let me show you how time was a factor in Hoffman film. In Michael Hoffman's film the play took place in the turn of the…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes Vs Locke

    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Firstly, laws had to be created that reflected the needs of the population. In addition, these laws must become relatively fixed within the framework of that society, to the extent that those who would come under their influence would know them. Locke also felt that it was imperative to have at the core of these legal institutions impartial judges, who would have both knowledge of the law and authority to adjudicate in legal disputes. Finally, Locke rightly believed that all of this would be pointless unless the society had in place the resources to enforce these laws. If it did not, then quite simply the laws would not be followed…

    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Politics the main focus is on the foundations and backbone of a city. Critical aspects such as citizenry and justice can be used as vessels in which we explain the relationship between politics and ethics. One of Aristotle’s core beliefs is that one does not necessarily need to be a good individual as long as they are a good citizen. This view is very particular in that he justifies this idea with the notion that ethics one contributes to the smooth running of a community are far more important than personal ethicsi. He also emphasizes that humans naturally try to define what is just and unjust, while reaching for the greater good in lifeii. Aristotle takes this view and argues that the best kind of government is one where the citizen is able to be governed and can govern in a general direction towards excellenceiii. Aristotle’s ending claim is that the constitution is the life of the city and a set of ethics in the constitution is what allows for the stable existence of the state, its politics and the political science surrounding itiv.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke believes in the property of the world for every human being, and the property of the body to oneself. Whatever is done with that body belongs to that body. But that transfers over to what that body experiences, and what it touches, and when. So, I do believe that there are facts to what is what, and what belongs to who based on simple question of what is done with each body. He says at the very end of chapter five in the second treaty, "...what portion a man carved to himself, was easily seen; and it was useless as well as dishonest to carve himself too much..." (302). The words useless and dishonest stood out for me, because if it is so useless, then why do people continue to carve more for themselves in more instances than one? And if it is to be dishonest, who is it hurting personally if one takes more for themselves? Those who have less? There is a class system. The proletariat relinquishes what they have to become a part of a class, and a mindset for the better. The savage homo-sapien relinquishes their violent way for a mindset of peace. This being said, there are those who give up, and those who are left to take what is given up. Locke believed in a system, and in that system there are going to be those who make things happen, and those who benefit from those things happening. If you make things happen then you are more likely to receive the benefits from it. Most who put in the work are better off in…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke has a very distinct definition of freedom and freedom is the foundation of his accounts in Second Treatise of Government. He believes that freedom is the basis for natural state of humans, property, and the highest good. Locke was one of the first philosophers to consider the natural rights of women children and slaves. He states very early on in his writings, that all humans are characteristically in a state of “perfect freedom” which permits them to control their actions, determine their person, and think without the will of any other human. In their natural state, humans have perfect freedom, which is the ability to order actions as one sees fit. This capacity is given to all, and is an impartial state of equality. (Locke Chap.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The thought is that the powered would be empowered to act by positive laws. Since the majority ruled the choices of the society, no one saw any danger in joining; they would all get a say in their 'partial freedom'. The conclusion to man giving up their freedom is indeed to preserve their property. Property was very important to the people in this time and keeping it safe was a big concern. Men wanted to feel that their slaves as well as their land would not be taken away. By joining the society and uniting with others, they saw that the need to defend their land was no longer necessary. Locke clearly saw the reasons for why a man would give up his freedom; to feel secure, to live…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays