To Weber, a social action was an action carried out by an individual to which a person attached a meaning, an action that takes into account the existence and possible reaction of others. In other words, if you do not think about an action, it is not a social action. So an accidental car accident or a sneeze are NOT social actions. Also, if an action does not take into account the existence and possible reaction of others (i,e. no one knows about it but you) it is also not a social action. So (for example) whacking off in the shower or praying in private are NOT social actions.
Social action can be explained, according to Weber, in two levels of understanding (or 'Verstehen'). The first is 'direct observational understanding' (or 'aktuelles Verstehen'). For example, you can see that someone is upset by their facial expression. If you see a person hitting wood with his axe, you know he is chopping wood. However this is just the first level of understanding.
The second level of understanding is 'explanatory understanding' (or 'erklarendes Verstehen'), that is, understanding the social action based on the meaning/motive behind his act. Was the woodcutter cutting to earn a wage, build a fire or to work off anger? To achieve this kind of understanding it is necessary to imagine yourself in their situation to try and get at the motives behind their actions.
To Weber even this level of understanding is not enough: for a full causal explanation it is necessary to understand what gave rise to the motives behind the social actions.
Weber goes on to detail in great length the benefits of bureaucracy and rational authority, but I assume that's off-topic.
Source(s):
Haralambos and Holborn sociology textbook
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Max Weber theorized that a "Bureaucracy" is a social system achieves which of the following?…
- 1002 Words
- 7 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
1. According to the author, our explanations of social problems, for the most part, are based on all the following except:…
- 6156 Words
- 62 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
According to the author, our explanations of social problems, for the most part, are based on all the following except:…
- 1921 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Social action theories are known as micro theories which take a bottom-up approach to studying society; they look at how individuals within society interact with each other. There are many forms of social action theories, the main ones being symbolic interactionism, phenomenology and ethnomethodology. They are all based on the work of Max Weber, a sociologist, who acknowledged that structural factors can shape our behaviour but individuals do have reasons for their actions. He used this to explain why people behave in the way in which they do within society. Weber saw four types of actions which are commonly committed within society; rational, this includes logical plans which are used to achieve goals, traditional-customary behaviour, this is behaviour which is traditional and has always been done; he also saw affectual actions, this includes an emotion associated with an action and value-rational actions, this is behaviour which is seen as logical by an individual. Weber’s discovery of these actions can therefore be seen as useful in the study of society. Weber discovered these actions by using his concept of verstehan, a deeper understanding. However, some sociologists have criticised him as they argue that verstehan cannot be accomplished as it is not possible to see thing in the way that others see them, leaving sociologists to question whether Weber’s social action theory is useful in the study of society.…
- 763 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Max Weber’s social theory was based on motivations that guide individual behavior, and the reasons we behave the way that we do. In order to understand deeply the answer for those motivations that brings an individual to act in a certain way, we need to not just look at the appearances or the social environment around but to go deeper and try to get inside people’s mind a see if we can figure out or give a meaning to the world around them, Weber said. It reminds me when people have a prejudices on others without even knowing them. It is to me like judging a book by its cover, wrong. Sometimes when we see people acting or behaving in a way that it is not natural, we don’t need to instantly judge or say something bad but instead would be better to know the why the person in behaving like that and what is going through his head at the moment. So, as Max Weber stated, and I personally think it is right, we all need to understand that behind an action or behave there are motives for that action and we can only find the meaning inside people’s…
- 818 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Compare and contrast the views of Goffman and Foucault on how social order is produced.…
- 1742 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Which of the following is the BEST example of something that sociologists might study?…
- 659 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Society. The basic social acts (the ones that create meaning only) must involve some kind of initial gesture from a person. Then, this act must receive some kind of response to this gesture from another person. Finally, some kind of result appears (Nelson). Life of any person is full of such moments, especially in childhood and youth. It is so because when a person learns new concepts and models of behavior, learning the life, this individual does something and then has to see the response to this action and only then this person will know what kind of act it is. The simplest example is smoking. Being a child, I was not aware that smoking is bad because I did not know about it. Then, at school, kids have been told that smoking is bad. However, children are maximalists, usually. We all have tried smoking and then it was considered as cool thing s because other kids gave the response that it was cool. Then, parents explained why it was bad and the problem was solved.…
- 571 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
He also had influences that shaped the way in he thought of and saw the world one of them being Marx because he always found ways to either agree or disagree with Marx’s theories, an instance of this is when both theorists are arguing about class. Similar to Marx, Weber saw class as economically determined. He believed society was split between owners and laborers. Status, on the other hand, was based on noneconomic factors such as education, connection, and religion. Both status and class determined an individual’s power, or influence over concepts. Unlike Marx, Weber thought that these individuals understanding of one another and the world they formed the base of a stable society. For weber a rational society is one built around logic and efficiency rather than morality or tradition. To Weber, capitalism is entirely rational. Although this leads to productivity and merit-based success, it can have adverse effects when taken to the extreme. Weber was also unlike his predecessors was more interested in how individuals experienced societal divisions than in the…
- 886 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
After researchers do a field study of deviant behavior during a riot, law enforcement officials demand that the researchers identify the persons who were observed looting. Rather than risk arrest as accomplices after the fact, the researchers comply and turn over the names.…
- 551 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Finally, in addition to school involvement and family, relationships with peers are another important stage of child development. Friendships suggest a new type of socialization for children, where the social interactions offer development of skills and interests. As mentioned by Aseltine (1995), peer groups are often formed based on social interaction opposed to social influence. Individuals tend to gravitate towards other of similar interests, where the group then fosters particular attitudes and beliefs. In relation to the social learning theory, individuals learn certain behaviours through observation and imitation of others (Chenier, Fall 2015b). For children, they begin to adopt particular behaviours through observations of social interactions,…
- 469 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Weber, M. (1947). Social Action. In A. M. Henderson, & T. Parsons, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (pp. 88-117). NY Oxford.…
- 1188 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Social Action Theorists, or Interactionists are also known as micro sociologists, this is because instead of looking at the bigger picture in society, and how the large structures and institutions such as the education and judiciary systems affect individuals, which is what Marxists and Functionalists (macro sociologists) look at, Social Action Theorists look at the opposite, how us, individuals, act by our own accord, and how we make up society. This is known as a ‘bottom up’ view of society. They see people as having a much more active role in society, as opposed to the passive puppets that Structuralists make us out to be. They reject the view that our behaviour is the product of these organisations and structure.…
- 941 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Human beings can explain anything. No matter the cause, we have a strong need to understand and explain everything. Due to people feeling the need to explain, it goes beyond the information received. Attribution theory is a theory about how people explain things.3333333333333. Explanation is a synonym for attribution. There are two types of explanations about why things happen. They are external attribution and internal attribution. External attribution places blame to an outside agent or force.333333333. An example is "My girlfriend made me do it." An internal attribution puts all blames on him or herself.33333333333. An example of this is "It is my entire fault we lost the game, all I had to do was make that…
- 561 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
With that being said social interactions play a major role in our everyday lives in that things that other people say or do have a profound impact on what we say or do as a reaction. Even if we don’t follow through with an action, the social interaction with other people at minimum sparks a thought that can later shape or become a part of who we are (Baron, 2008).…
- 1755 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays