Social Inequality Patterns And Processes
This paper will compare and contrast the functionalist theory of inequality with the conflict theory of inequality. These two theories explain how the roles in society work for the need of inequality and the dysfunctions of inequality. The book that I am referencing is titled Social Inequality Patterns and Processes by Martin N. Marger. Functional theory states that there are certain roles in society that are necessary roles that must be filled in order for the society to function properly, but also, some roles are more important than others. While these roles may require more training and expertise regarding the functions, I do not believe that one role should overpower another because each plays a certain role to society. The conflict
theory states that power is what decides which role is more important. While each role is distinctly important, the rich and powerful seem to take the stage at the expense of the poor. The people who are at the bottom do not get a fair chance to compete and are merely stuck at the bottom. I feel a bit torn between the two, because I also want to believe that if someone really wants to succeed, they can do so through hard work, but I also know that it is much easier for someone who comes from a wealthy family, to easily transition into a role that is considered to be at the top, such as a doctor. Furthermore, I would have to say that the conflict theory is more accurate than the functional theory because although some roles may seem more vital than others, they each play a vital role in how our society works as a whole, no matter how big or small. Teachers are no less important than doctors, and without teachers to teach our children, one might never have the opportunity to become a doctor without the guidance and teaching needed to pursue a career as a doctor. We live in a very competitive world. Each role one takes has a particular effect on society. Not all of us will get a fair chance to compete and those at the top of the social hierarchy use their power to prevent the poor from obtaining a greater share of the rewards.
theory states that power is what decides which role is more important. While each role is distinctly important, the rich and powerful seem to take the stage at the expense of the poor. The people who are at the bottom do not get a fair chance to compete and are merely stuck at the bottom. I feel a bit torn between the two, because I also want to believe that if someone really wants to succeed, they can do so through hard work, but I also know that it is much easier for someone who comes from a wealthy family, to easily transition into a role that is considered to be at the top, such as a doctor. Furthermore, I would have to say that the conflict theory is more accurate than the functional theory because although some roles may seem more vital than others, they each play a vital role in how our society works as a whole, no matter how big or small. Teachers are no less important than doctors, and without teachers to teach our children, one might never have the opportunity to become a doctor without the guidance and teaching needed to pursue a career as a doctor. We live in a very competitive world. Each role one takes has a particular effect on society. Not all of us will get a fair chance to compete and those at the top of the social hierarchy use their power to prevent the poor from obtaining a greater share of the rewards.