Preview

Social Integration - Emile Durkheim

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
667 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Integration - Emile Durkheim
1 - What is meant by the term ‘social integration’? How did Emile Durkheim explain the differences in integration between modern and pre-modern societies?

Emile Durkheim introduced the theory of social integration in the late nineteenth century, it is the means through which people interact, connect and confirm each other within a community. It is a way of describing the established patterns of human relations in societies. The differences in integration between modern and pre-modern societies were explained by Durkheim in two key terms that pre-modern societies are held together by mechanical solidarity and modern societies are held together by organic solidarity. Solidarity is the structure of human groups into a social unity.

In the Division of labour in Society Durkheim described Durkheim described how social order was maintained in societies based on mechanical and organic forms of solidarity, he explained the transition from more traditional societies to modern societies where solidarity changes from mechanic to organic. This change occurred through the growing division of labour as a result of this the increasing industrialisation and the process of modernisation meant societies changed from pre-modern to modern and as this change happened so did the form of solidarity that held individuals together.

In traditional pre-modern societies which Durkheim described as mechanical people felt connected through similar work, educational and religious lifestyles. These societies are generally simple and in the form of tribes or clans’ one cannot be an individual in society the society. Although individuals perform different tasks and have different values and interests, the order and solidarity of society depends on them to perform their specific task. The mechanical solidarity is possible only when personality is submerged collectively, there is uniformity and similarities in terms of what people do and how they think. Peoples are self sufficient and



References: A Science of Society: Emile Durkheim - Week 4 lecture in SGY110 Australian and Global Society Downloaded 29/06/2011 Durkheim, E. 1964 (1895) The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press. Durkheim, E. 1979 (1897) Suicide: A Study in Sociology. New York: Free Press. The Society of Social Research http://ssr1.uchicago.edu/PRELIMS/Theory/durkheim.html Accessed 24 August (2011) University of Dayton Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work http://academic.udayton.edu/clarakim/101-articles/1-intro/1-Durkheim.pdf Accessed 24 August (2011)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Emile Durkheim was a key sociological thinker of the 19th century. He was one of the first people to try and explain and understand society as a whole by looking at all the different parts of society. He studied the ways in which society was held together through moral and social bonds. This came to be known as ‘functionalism’. It was a word used to describe a complicated system in which different pieces fit together to form a stable and structured society.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Emile Durkheim was a French sociologist who felt that modernization occurred because of an increase in “specialized economic activity” (Macionis, 2006). His theory suggests that in years past, the traditional members of society all shared the same activities. Tasks such as farming, fishing, and cooking, gathering wood and gathering water were many of the shared activities of a community in the past centuries.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Durkheim lived from 1858 – 1917, and was a key actor both in the foundation of sociology, social science and, as is contextually synonymous, in the…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Émile Durkheim (1858 – 1917) was also a sociologist, social psychologist and philosopher like Mead, except, unlike Mead, he was French. His three major works include “The Division of Labor” (1893), “Suicide” (1897), and “The Elementary Forms of Religious Life” (1912) and he believed that they all explained a social phenomena. Durkheim’s theories were based on things that were external in nature as opposed to those that were internal in nature. The division of labor occurred when social organization shifted from being traditional (Mechanical Solidarity) to modern (Organic Solidarity). In the olden days, people were self-sufficient, feeding themselves and their families, bounded by similarities in religions, values, societal norms, occupations, backgrounds,… However, in the modern…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Durkheim’s concept of social/moral regulation, society imposes limits on humans to regulate their passions, desires, expectations, ambitions and roles. When these limits or social regulations break down, the…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Durkheim’s view, modern societies the rules governing behaviour become weaker and less clear-cut. This is because modern societies have a complex, specialised division of labour, which leads to individuals increasingly different from one another. This means that the shared culture or collective conscience is weakened, and this results in higher levels of crime and deviance…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Name and discuss at least three defining characteristics of indigenous religions. Then describe at least one aspect of indigenous religions that exists in a similar form in a traditional mainstream religion.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The ‘father of academic sociology’ (Hopkins Burke, 2006), Emile Durkheim believed that crime was an important necessity in every society as it played important functional roles in the maintenance of social cohesion, the continuity of social progress and the establishment and reinforcement of societal norms. He stated that criminality was a normal phenomenon, its influence prevalent even on the most saintly of societies. Durkheim’s theories regarding the normality and inevitability of crime, along with his influential concepts of anomie, the division of labour and mechanical and organic solidarity, had a lasting effect on the field of criminological study, particularly in subsequent research conducted by fellow populist theorists of the Chicago School.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber and Georg Simmel are the dominant classical voices when studying or analyzing the rise of civilization from a more cooperative, collective feudal social order to a modern capitalistic society. All four of these sociological philosophers contributed to the contemporary understanding of the nature of society and social change. Each of them eventually surmised that economic conditions directly influenced the relationship between individuals and their fellows, and individuals and their world. Although they had differences in their viewpoints, they were acutely concerned with the evolving market society and its effect on human interaction. Marx developed his concept of “alienation”, Durkheim expressed thoughts on social solidarity, Weber and Simmel emphasized how the emergence of capitalism affected the way people think, making the rational calculation of means and ends more ubiquitous and placing significant importance on rationalism and disenchantment. The outcome for the modern citizen was not naturally grounded in humanitarianism…

    • 3246 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sociology and Answer

    • 2095 Words
    • 9 Pages

    | French sociologist Emile Durkheim observed that rapid social change and a more specialized division of labor produce strain in society; these strains lead to a breakdown in traditional organization, values, and authority and to a dramatic increase in:…

    • 2095 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim argued that industrial societies are complex. Within these complex societies social inequality and social difference were an inevitable and important part of maintaining social order and preventing a state of ‘anomie’ or chaos. He believed that society needs specialists to undertake the various jobs and roles required to make it run smoothly. This harmony could be achieved by a division of labour whereby people have different jobs based on their talents. Some of the jobs would have higher status than others and greater rewards and power, for example jobs such as lawyers, doctors and barristers. People would accept this as long as they could see that the system was fair. Conflict might occur but it could be controlled by socialisation. Socialisation was the process whereby shared values could be passed from one generation to the next. Disharmony might arise when people felt the system was not fair, for example, when large bonuses are paid to bankers during a recession.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collins Dictionary of Sociology, p406 adapted from S. Lukes, Emile Durkheim: His life and Work (1973) London:Allen Lane Museum of Natural History…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Emile Durkheim was a French theorist who wanted to create an ideal of sociology based on the idea that society is an unbiased and limiting material reality, independent to the individual. According to Durkheim, the division of labor is basically a significant source of social solidarity dating back to the foundation of life that links together and affects civil, economic, educational, and legal processes. This new…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of Durkheim’s main functions was ‘social solidarity.’ Social solidarity means ‘social unity’ what’s meant by this is that society should have a sense of solidarity. Individual members must feel themselves to become a part of a community. Durkheim believes that the education system helps to creates social solidarity by transmitting society’s culture. He believes the education system does this by teaching children about a country’s history, he believes this instils in children a sense of a shared heritage and a commitment to the wider social group. Durkheim believes that social solidarity is good because he believes that it creates a stronger society, knowing about the different norms and values that are considered vital in society.…

    • 344 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The approach Durkheim used most often was positivist sociology. This sociology is used based on the fact that there is an objective reality that exists. This method likes to have things to actually measure and usually done in a lab. They have to define the concepts for their experiments and out into place what variables and controls they will use. Most sociologists that use this method go for the cause and effect aspect of society. These sociologists try putting aside their beliefs and attitudes to keep them from interfering with their results which is called objectivity (34). The limitations to this method are:…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics