Preview

Social Structure in Ancient Rome

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1962 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Structure in Ancient Rome
Social Structure in Ancient Rome
Europe: Unity and Diversity EURO1111 Louis MA KAI HO (12011959)

December 18, 2012

2

Social Structure in Ancient Rome Introduction
After few months of study of the ancient Europe, from the ancient Greek polis to the Roman Empire to the development of Christianity to the Medieval Europe, the concept of “Europe” gradually has become more and more clear to me, so do the meaning of unity in its diversity and the diversity in its unity. Among the different times, the Ancient Rome appears more fascinating and interesting to me, especially in the area of its social structure. Therefore, in this term paper, the social structure of the Ancient Rome is selected as my topic, general information of the subject and analysis of its impact are outlined in the following.

3

Main Body When I first saw this topic—Social Structure in Ancient Rome, the first thing that came to my mind is what really is “social structure”? And where should I start to get the relevant references and materials, given that the Ancient Roman is of 1300 years of history. I realized it is necessary to give the definition of “social structure” and find the focus of the time for my topic so that I can have a more comprehensive and in-depth study of my subject. Here comes the definition from Wikipedia,

“The notion of social structure as relationships between different entities or groups or as enduring and relatively stable patterns of relationship ' ' emphasises the idea that society is grouped into structurally related groups or sets of roles, with different functions, meanings or purposes. One example of social structure is the idea of "social stratification", which refers to the idea that society is separated into different strata (levels), guided (if only partially) by the underlying structures in the social system. This approach has been important in the academic literature with the rise of various forms of structuralism. It is important in the modern



References: 1.Social Class in Rome http://www.mariamilani.com/ancient_rome/rome_social_structure_class_patricians.h tm 2.Social Structure in Rome http://ancientrome.wikispaces.com/Social+Structure+in+Rome 3.Social Structure of Ancient Rome http://prezi.com/n87fizkie1sd/social-structure-of-ancient-rome/ 4.Ancient Rome Social Hierarchy 11 http://www.hierarchystructure.com/ancient-rome-social-hierarchy/ 5.Ancient Rome http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_rome

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early Roman Empires DBQ

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Forum was the central gathering for the Romans. The Forum was considered to be their capital, and with a centralized place, comes centralized government and laws (8). The Romans also held the importance of Senators, and ruling office very close. The senators were the ones who were able to keep the native-born citizens living a hectic free lifestyle (5). Religious views and inputs were also held very high in Rome. The Romans placed material goods higher up in their life (6). Rome also classified their citizens into three different social categories. First were the Egyptians and natives who were very poor citizens, second was the mercenaries who were an undiscipled body, and the third was Alexandrians who unlike their mercenaries, followed the Hellenistic customs, and were of Greek origin (10).…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han and Imperial Rome both exercised political control through similar government structures and social hierarchies. There were many elites who supported Han China’s emperor, Wu di and the “mandate of Heaven.” In Han, their government hierarchies were based on confusium. The followers of this included many bureaucrats, common people, and peasants. Imperial rome had a had a very similar way of ranking these people. Rome had a main leader. Emperor Augustus Ceasar. The top class in Rome was then bureaucrats and politicians, much like Han China. Below them came merchants, common people, and peasants. Then even below them came Slaves used for labor, but this was only used in Imperial Rome. This ranking system was a major similarity between these two civilizations political structure, and structure both civilizations greatly.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hierarchy. But in contrast, the Romans were more benign on the one affecting the family’s hierarchy,…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The final failure of the great civilization of Rome, was a slow, fatal, apparently irreversible process which seems to begin in the third century AD and is completed, at least as far as western Europe is concerned, in the fifth. During the long decline, great self-made figures, never from Rome but from the fringes of the empire, come forward and seek, by heroic efforts, to restore the unity, the security, the stability of the empire. They are famous figures in politics, religion, and art. The Roman Empire from 100 C.E. – 600 C.E. had many cultural and political changes as well as cultural and political continuities.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Omar Medina

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page

    In a political aspect Rome had a more structured assembly. They had about 300 men and they served for life. The senate had primary responsibilities for foreign relations including selecting ambassadors, making treaties and creating alliances. The 30o members usually came from the oldest Roman families and inherited their seats. People were ranked into distinct classes. This ranking was based on wealth, heritage, administrative competence, martial status, and physical and moral fitness. This determined the citizen’s political privileges.…

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Study Guide Chapters 1-4

    • 2553 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Social Structure is the social patterns through which a society is organized. Horizontal Structure is the…

    • 2553 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The upper house, Senate, was exclusively controlled by patricians, the upper class of Ancient Rome society. The lower house, the Centuriate Assembly, has a huge representation by the plebians even though it was still technically heavily influenced by the patricians. Similarly, our nation's policy making rests on the Senate and Congress, with both houses counteracting one another to ensure that not one house exercises greater power than the other. In addition, in modern United Stated, a well-established, well-organized government consisting of the judicial, executive and legislative branches provided checks and balance. Nevertheless, elitism was a prevalent phenomenon in the ruling class of Ancient Rome, much like the current American elite politicians yielding vast political power.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethic Notions

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Social structure is a system that coordinates human activities in broadly predictable ways, shaping relationships and opportunities to connect to others, gives people an identity, puts up barriers to accessing resources and people, and determines the relative ease or difficulty with which those barriers can be broken.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social stratification refers to a system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. Hypothetically, we can analyze social stratification from three major perspectives. Structural functionalists argue that social stratification is beneficial for a society, while a conflict theorist would argue that, rather than benefiting society as a whole, stratification provides some people with advantages over others. Finally, a symbolic interactionist would analyze how social stratification helps us see patterns of social inequality in our everyday…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shelton, Jo-Ann. As the Romans Did: A Sourcebook in Roman Social History. New York: Oxford UP, 1998. Print.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has always been a type social structure in almost every modern civilization. People live by these social institutions. It determines interactions, behavior, and values. Social structures also distinguish who holds power and authority among the society, who does the menial work or gruesome labor, and who is cherished, appreciated or idolized.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My Blog

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cited: Adkins, Lesley and Roy. Handbook to Life in Ancient Rome. New York: Oxford University Press; Reprint edition, 1998.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    modern day america

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When comparing Ancient Rome to the Modern Day America, it’s difficult to find a reason for what’s different between the two. Even though the two are separated between over two thousand years of history, Ancient Rome has helped shaped to what is America today. Rome’s ancient culture is very much like the American culture and has many similarities. Some examples on how Ancient Rome is similar to the Modern Day America are the Social Classes, Republic System, and Language.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Social Life

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During the first century AD entertainment was an important part of a Roman’s life. All Romans, regardless of status, would have attended these events at the baths, circus, amphitheatre or theatre. Entertainment was usually sponsored by the Emperor and was often used as a way to keep the Plebian masses supportive and happy.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Regarding their social structures, both empires had very similar norms when it came to positions in society. On a the larger scale regarding the entire empires, both had capitals which were the center of wealth and social importance. In important Roman cities such as Rome and Constantinople there was an important…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays