Preview

Social&Technology Analysis of Revlon

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
891 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social&Technology Analysis of Revlon
Social, culture and environmental
Issues that may impact the industry include consumers ' concerns about product safety and the use of animal testing by cosmetics companies[1].
In 1990, cosmetics giant Revlon became one of the first industry heavyweights to swear off all animal testing. Since then, Revlon has grown to be an animal-friendly empire, garnering awards for its products from magazines such as Cosmopolitan, Teen People, Allure, and In Style[2]. That is a signal that Revlon has an awareness of social responsibility and also showed their concerns about natural environment.
Besides, with the income increasing, modern people are more willing to purchase personal care products and cosmetics for themselves. The age range of consumers is developing to both younger and elder. These trends are obviously seen especially in some developing countries and areas. Since the majority of personal care products are currently sold in the United States, Japan, Canada, and European countries(less than 20%of worlds population), the potential for sales of personal care products around the world is excellent.
Increasingly, cosmetics/personal care is not an industry for women only; men purchase personal care products such as skin creams and hair care products/dyes and many men are trying cosmetics in an effort to improve their appearance. The market for hair colouring has expanded with teenagers and adults wanting more vibrant colouring options[3].
Revlon also shows its social responsibility according to charities. There are the most recent examples which are significant. Through November 2008, Revlon donated a percentage of their profits to the Rainbow Trust children’s charity. Another one is announced in May of 2009. Revlon said it would donate 10% of sales (up to $100,000) of its new color collection to fund women`s cancer program in partnership with the EIF, which full name is Entertainment Industry Foundation.

References:
[1]Fred R. David, Strategic



References: [1]Revlon, 2008 annul report. Pdf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    hey hey

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cosmetic and drug companies continually face opposition due to the fact that they use animals for the testing of their products. Some feel that this procedure goes against the rights which are given to all living beings, including animals, while others see the positive impact that animal testing brings to the lives of human beings.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing on cosmetics is morally inept and other alternatives need to be used. Cosmetics are made using several different molecular and chemical compound ingredients which can be toxic or have dangerous side effects if not tested. In 1938 Congress passed the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic act due to public outrage after many people experienced death or injuries from untested products. According to the FDA animals are tested for “how much of a drug or biologic is absorbed into the blood, how a medical product is broken down chemically in the body, the toxicity of the product and its breakdown components (metabolites),” and “how quickly the product and its metabolites are excreted from the body.”…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How many people have your lipstick and mascara killed? Luckily, most makeup is tested on bunnies, cats, dogs, guinea pigs, and monkeys so there is no need to worry about that. Eminent cosmetic companies such as Maybelline, Sally Hansen, Neutrogena, and Cover Girl test their makeup products on animals. Companies use cosmetic testing as a defense to avoid law suits in case anything happens. Even Dove tests on animals which led to the death of its trademark. It’s unfortunate, but it’s so that we know your lipstick will not suddenly murder you. The few foolish companies that do not test on animals, such as Bath and Body Works, Burt’s Bees, Urban Decay, the Body Shop, M.A.C, Clinique, Kate Spade, E.L.F, Chanel, and Revlon, obviously don’t know what they’re doing.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Satire

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many animals are subject to inhumane conditions and procedures in the “name of science”. Animals are used for testing in everything from that trendy matte red lipstick from Covergirl Cosmetics to medical lab testing used to correctly identify the antibody signaling an immune response in lab rats. Animal testing has a vast range of uses with little to no rules identifying the treatment the animal subject to testing is subjected to. Many different brands, especially cosmetic brands, have cruelty-free stickers on their products to let the customer know the product was produced without harm to animals. The United States of America has not limited the use of animal testing yet, however, the European Union has limited animal testing and banned the use of testing on animals on cosmetics and cosmetic ingredients (European…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, as you see there are many ways to avoid the use of animal testing for cosmetics and it is very painful for these poor animals to go through what they go through during an experiment. Millions of animals lives are taken,…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Animal Testing

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The products we use everyday are a luxury that we are blessed to have and be able to use everyday. They are so easy to use and the benefits are so great that people don’t really care how they are made before they hit the shelves. But not many people think about all the tests that the product had to go through to get on the store's shelves. Not many people think about the negatives of the product and all the test that are done on ANIMALS. Animals that are tested on are put through medical tests that could potentially kill them or harm them extremely. The beauty product industry and scientist should find a new way to test their products and drugs without the endangerment to animals.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other side of the world, many countries’ unions, like the EU (European Union), have already banned cosmetic animal testing in 2004 (Baetz). The ban placed by the EU has been considered by many animal activists and animal right’s supporters to be a huge stride in ending animals’ unnecessary suffering, and Europe now has the honor of being the world’s largest cruelty-free cosmetics market (Baetz). Due to the European’s advocacy for cruelty-free cosmetics, their demand for the end of animal testing among the American cosmetic and personal care product industries has resulted in the reduced use of animal testing by American industries in order to keep overseas business…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What product features grab the attention of the customer who strolls down the cosmetic aisle of the store? Is it the discovery of which perfume smells appealing or which brand of shampoo is the cheapest? Or does the consumer consider whether animals suffered during testing to ensure that the purchased shampoo or perfume was safe for human use? My guess is probably not. Little does our society recognize that many drugs, cosmetic items, and household chemicals have been rigorously tested on animals before ever lining the shelves of local department and grocery stores and in this process animals have been harmed or sacrificed.…

    • 1997 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Animal Testing Is Bad

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Europe, which has the largest cosmetics market in the world, along with Israel, and India all have banned animal testing for cosmetics. They also banned the sale and import of newly animal tested beauty products (“11 Facts About Animal Testing”). The US should follow in the footsteps of these countries to help reduce animal testing rates. There are also some alternative testing options that don’t require animals to be used all the time (“In Testing | Alternatives to Animal Testing and Research”). Animal testing shouldn’t be continued, because the drugs produced from it rarely work, it’s cruel and inhumane, and it’s an expensive process.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Back in this time, it was only performed for scientific and religious reasons. It was once believed that animals did not have feelings and couldn’t feel pain from the tests, which is why scientists and researchers felt no guilt when treating animals as such insensitive objects. Cosmetics began to be tested on animals in 1933. There were many unfortunate incidents of products backfiring on costumers after being approved through animal research. As animal testing continued to grow, so did the animal protection organizations. In 1981, the John Hopkins Center for the Alternatives to Animal Testing was formed to improve health for both people and animals. Revlon and Avon were the first major cosmetic company to stop testing their products on animals in 1989. While these were steps in the right direction, animal experimentation is still being practiced actively…

    • 2066 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every year millions of animals suffer and die in painful tests; in order to determine the safety of make-up products. Products like eye shadow and soap are tested on rabbits, guinea pigs, rats, dogs, and many other animals; despite the fact that the test results do not help prevent or treat human illness or injury. Cosmetics are not required to be experimented on animals, and since non-animal alternatives exist, it is difficult to understand why some companies still choose to conduct these stupid, harmful and unnecessary tests. Cosmetic companies kill millions of animals every year just to put a few more dollars into their companies. The companies who perform these tests claim that they establish the safety…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Animal Testing Wrong

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The California Biomedical Research Association says that there major medical breakthroughs have been acquired by using animals in their research. The polio vaccine was tested on animals. This reduced the number of cases from three-hundred fifty thousand cases to two-hundred twenty three cases. On the contrary animal experimentation is still cruel and inhumane. Recently, cruelty free makeup has become a popular in the cosmetic industry. People are becoming more aware of how dangerous cosmetic testing is to animals. There is a large amount of ads now being produced about animal testing. Speaking of ads, on April 15th, 1980, The New York Times published an ad created by Henry Spira. The ad said “How Many Rabbits does Revlon Blind for Beauty's Sake?” This ad created an outrage and brought much attention to the Draize drug being tested on animals. The Draize test is little drops placed in the test animals eyes. This drug causes excruciating pain to the animal and can cause blindness. There is now may cosmetic companies making their products cruelty free due to the pictures of animals that were tested on being exposed to the public. After the commotion of the ad, a campaign called Be Cruelty-Free was created. The campaign was created by The Humane Society of the United States and Humane Society International. The campaign is going for L’Oreal. L’Oreal still uses animals in their cosmetic testing and sells their products in China, where animal testing is still a common…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Tina Benitez-Eves, vegan animal friendly is a “health movement” that is not going away. Technically testing cosmetics on animals is not required according to the Food and Drug Administration (This is Not a Test 4). Consumers prefer the “not tested on animals” packaging claim according to Tina Benitez-Eves. Ultimately, the benefits of testing on animals is not worth it because of all the pain and suffering the animals are put through. There has been no results in twenty-five years of extensive research and positive results in animal models, not a single anti-tumor drug has emerged. (Animal Rights: All That Matters 5). Natacha Cole states that many cosmetic companies test their new products and ingredients by forcing rabbits, hamsters, and mice, among others, to endure horrific practices such as breathing in poisonous fumes or having lethal chemicals poured into their eyes and rubbed into their skin (Cruelty-Free Cosmetics 101 3). According to Yolanda Brooks, experimentation not only causes great physical harm to the animals themselves, but is of little value to human health (Do Animals Have Rights? 6). People would much rather buy and use products that are cruelty free than those that are tested and…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 1371 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The combination of a requirement to test cosmetics on animals to sell products in China, and a ban on testing to sell new cosmetics in the EU leaves companies in a bind — leaves companies being forced to choose between two contradictory requirements and be shut out of one market or the other.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The controversy of animal experimentation in the cosmetics industry is one that was swept the globe and caused for a dispute of the morality of using animals to perceive the safety of certain products. While some people argue that new test animal experimentation is not always not always accurate, others provide evidence in which may deem animal testing unreliable. The effects of animal experimentation are clearly visible in the death rate of animals that live in test labs, finding alternatives seems to be very difficult for many companies in the cosmetic industry. There are many positives and negatives to animal testing, and the subject had been a very debatable topic in which neither side has been able to come to a clear solution. Each side has its own evidence to prove its point. All the evidence is true and understandable, so the decision on whether animal experimentation is right or wrong seems to come down to a matter of opinion.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays