Preview

Anthony Douglas Williams 'The Animal Testing Paradox'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1079 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anthony Douglas Williams 'The Animal Testing Paradox'
The Animal Testing Paradox
“Earth was created for all life, not just human life.”-Anthony Douglas Williams. Animal abuse can take forms in several different ways. One of the main ways that animals are mistreated is by cosmetic testing. The extremities of this topic have been kept out of the public eye for decades. Animal testing is wasteful, useless, and dangerous. The experiments that are done on these animals are gruesome. Bountiful amounts of people (about 62% in 2004 according to Heather Mason Kiefer) argue that animal testing is necessary in order to produce safe products. On the contrary, several studies have found these methods to be questionable.They lack accurate, safe results. Additionally, animal testing is a lot less effective
…show more content…
Animal testing on cosmetics is morally inept and other alternatives need to be used.
Cosmetics are made using several different molecular and chemical compound ingredients which can be toxic or have dangerous side effects if not tested. In 1938 Congress passed the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic act due to public outrage after many people experienced death or injuries from untested products. According to the FDA animals are tested for “how much of a drug or biologic is absorbed into the blood, how a medical product is broken down chemically in the body, the toxicity of the product and its breakdown components (metabolites),” and “how quickly the product and its metabolites are excreted from the body.” However, animal testing is immensely erroneous. The FDA states that 92% of products tested on animals fail on human subjects. That fact makes a lot of people, including the FDA, question why we even consider animal testing anymore. The FDA states that
…show more content…
labs for the sake of testing out ingredients that go towards things like shampoo or foundation. The horrors of these tests are inexplicable. According to MotherBoard, “Products are rubbed into the skin and eyes of animals, often causing damage including irritation, ulcers, and blindness. Animals are not given pain relief and are usually killed after the tests, according to the Humane society, by asphyxiation, neck breaking, or decapitation.” An example of this cruelty includes that “In the course of manufacturing Dysport®, an anti-wrinkle treatment, the Ipsen Corporation routinely performs a test known as Lethal Dose 50 Percent. The test involves injecting scores of mice with a powerful toxin in order to determine the dose that will kill 50 percent of the animals. The animals experience nausea and a wave of muscle paralysis, leading to severe distress as they slowly suffocate to death over the course of the three to four day procedure.” In one study, “inexperienced students at St. Lawrence University” were performing “unsupervised surgery without anesthesia on a rabbit” while it was “sitting up and kicking during the procedure.” After a lethal dose of radiation, “during a study conducted at the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute—a U.S. military facility—a pig showed signs of organ failure, loss

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Since the time of WW1, dogs have been used for testing different poisonous gasses and pesticides to study the effects that they would have on humans. Peta reports, "As unbelievable as it may seem, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires by law that pesticides be tested on dogs, who are shoved into "inhalation chambers" where they try in vain to escape the deadly poisons that are pumped in." The report of these horrendous tests have shown that no conclusion has been made on how these poisons could affect humans, the only conclusion drawn is that it causes death. A scene like the one described sounds like a scene taken straight out of a horror…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, animal testing is erroneous because it does not contribute anything meaningfully to the world. When animals are tested often the results are irrelevant, due to the fact, animals have many differences from humans. Also, the animals endure poor conditions. Lastly, the animals’ lives are wasted by being tested on products that are not important. Testing animals is abusive and needs to…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do you ever wonder how beauty products and medical treatment are get the seal of approval for human use? Today many beauty and health manufactures validate their product through animal testing. These poor and defenseless creatures are being held in steel cold cages waiting to be performed on to advance human life. Animal testing should be terminated because the animals live in fear and pain, violates their rights and other methods are available to accurate data for products and…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Inaccurate

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal testing has lead to the deaths of animals in horrible ways and is very inhumane, with modern technology we shouldn’t have to resort to such awful actions and we don’t need to there are many alternatives to animal testing and the alternatives can be cheaper and more accurate.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, everything about animal testing is very unethical and immoral. Many people are aware that animal testing goes on, but most people don't know the extremes that scientists will go to for research purposes. The sad truth is that if most people actually…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Animal Testing

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Examples of medications that have been the result of animal testing are Penicillin, several asthma treatments, cancer and HIV drugs, vaccines, antibiotics, and insulin (Occupy Theory, 1).” Since there can be new medications found from utilising this form of testing, many people see it as beneficial to the human population. Since it’s more beneficial to humans than it is a bigger hurt to the animal species, most people believe that animal testing is okay. But, according to William H. Farland and Vicki Vaughn-Dellarco, “Abelson comments that laboratory studies of chemicals and their use in risk assessment have not been shown to have substantially benefited human health (1908).” I had interviewed my AP Biology teacher Mr. Nolan Flores. He teaches regents biology, AP biology, and astronomy. Mr. Flores even teaches animal behaviors in biology so he has a basic knowledge of animals. When I had interviewed Mr. Flores he had talked about his personal view on animal testing. He concurred with the prior statement that if it is more beneficial to test on an animal because it could save someone's life, then he is for animal testing. For him, he also stated that it depends on the situation and if the testing is ethical or not. If it involves cruel or unusual punishment to the animal, then he is against…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sally Porter

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States fir various types of testing. These animals are used for scientific and commercial testing to develop medical treatments, determine toxicity of medications and chemicals, check the safety of products destined for human use and other biomedical or healthcare purposes. This testing on animals is cruel, inhumane and should be banned. It should be banned because the animals are held and live in inhumane conditions, it is harmful and at times lethal to the animals and there are other research method available that do not require animal testing.…

    • 599 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a lot of bad things that happen in this world and Animal Testing is one of them. Doctors,Scientists and other people test on these animals everyday. In my opinion there should be no animal testing at all. It is cruel. Right now there are millions of animals sitting in cold cages waiting for their next painful procedure. The stress, sterility and boredom causes them to develop neurotic behaviors such as, biting themselves and running around in circles. Most of these animals are killed after the testing because there is no possible way for them to live after this has happened. More than 100 million animals suffer this torture. Exact numbers have not been found, in rats, mice, birds, and cold blooded animals take up about 90 percent.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a cruel and ineffective medical practice that produces unreliable results that should be illegal and those laboratories should use safer alternatives that will provide more accurate results.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Testing Controversy

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages

    When shopping at a store, no one ever thinks when he or she buys makeup, cleaning products, deodorant or lotion, that it has potentially hurt an innocent animal. In fact, millions of animals die every year due to a chemical drug. Those animals harmed never got a chance to live a normal, animal life; instead, they were put into cages and locked up for years at a time. While animal testing can be used to ensure the safety of certain drugs for humans, potentially killing or harming the animal being tested deems this practice wrong because it is immoral to kill or injure an innocent animal.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article Animal Testing is Bad states, “Animals are being with feelings, thoughts, and families”(Elena1). They have a right to live peacefully and are not just subjects that should be tested on. Even though animals are a bit different from human, people cant kill them for their own sake. Scientists kill millions of animals in order to test if a product is safe for humans. It is not right and it is also not even accurate.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing Is Bad

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nearly 3% of animals survive the animal testing. Some of the animals they research on either die, get brain damage, lose an arm or a leg,and feel discomfort. That is why I feel animal testing is wrong. Some might believe that animal research is good because of shampoo, hair dye, conditioner.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the FDA encourages manufacturers to conduct whatever testing is necessary to ensure the safety of their products, it does not specifically require the use of animals. (FDA) The FDA actually encourages companies to consider alternatives before deciding that testing on animals is necessary. They advocate that research and testing for products use a maximum amount of useful scientific information and a minimal number of animals tested. When testing does occur, they advocate for the most humane methods available. The Food and Drug Administration supports the Animal Welfare Act and the Public Health Service Policy of Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. If companies are not required by the FDA to test their products on animals, there is no reason that it should be a method that is resorted to for experimentation.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We are torturing, killing, and degrading innocent animals every day for close to no reason. Animals and humans differ greatly from each other, therefore many animal tests are failures. Animal testing is doing more harm than good. Dr. Elias Zerhouni made the following comment on animal testing:…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every year millions of animals suffer and die in painful tests; in order to determine the safety of make-up products. Products like eye shadow and soap are tested on rabbits, guinea pigs, rats, dogs, and many other animals; despite the fact that the test results do not help prevent or treat human illness or injury. Cosmetics are not required to be experimented on animals, and since non-animal alternatives exist, it is difficult to understand why some companies still choose to conduct these stupid, harmful and unnecessary tests. Cosmetic companies kill millions of animals every year just to put a few more dollars into their companies. The companies who perform these tests claim that they establish the safety…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays