Preview

Animal Testing Inaccurate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1234 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Testing Inaccurate
Animal testing has lead to the deaths of animals in horrible ways and is very inhumane, with modern technology we shouldn’t have to resort to such awful actions and we don’t need to there are many alternatives to animal testing and the alternatives can be cheaper and more accurate.

Most animal testing is very inaccurate because human beings have different chemistry than animals, some animals are similar to humans but they have gaps that can prevent or make false cures that can do more harm than help that is why animals are given medicine that people are not prescribed. “U.S. Food and Drug Administration found that 92 percent of drugs entering clinical trials following animal testing fail to be approved. Of those approved, half are withdrawn
…show more content…
It might not be efficient at testing medicine because you will want to see how it affects human organs but you can also grow cells which is a lot more expensive but you can selectively choose what cells you want to grow like liver or muscle cells of anything. With this possibility the only reason to keep animal testing would be because of greed. “skin corrosivity and irritation can be easily measured using three-dimensional human skin equivalent systems such as EpiDerm and SkinEthic. Additional alternatives include EpiSkin (a model of reconstructed human epithelium) and a variety of sophisticated, computer-based Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) models that predict skin corrosivity and irritation by means of correlating a new drug or chemical with its likely activity, properties, and effects with classification accuracy between 90 and 95 percent”(NEAVS, …show more content…
Human beings must avoid tzar baalei chayim - causing pain to any living creature. God himself makes a covenant with the animals, just as he does with humanity.
The Talmud specifically instructs Jews not to cause pain to animals, and there are also several Bible stories which use kindness to animals as a demonstration of the virtues of leading Jewish figures.
Judaism also teaches that it is acceptable to harm or kill animals if that is the only way to fulfil an essential human

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    rodeo cruelty

    • 1847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    humans have tended to be the cause of the pain and suffering on animals without any…

    • 1847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, animal testing is erroneous because it does not contribute anything meaningfully to the world. When animals are tested often the results are irrelevant, due to the fact, animals have many differences from humans. Also, the animals endure poor conditions. Lastly, the animals’ lives are wasted by being tested on products that are not important. Testing animals is abusive and needs to…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is wasteful, useless, and dangerous. The experiments that are done on these animals are gruesome. Bountiful amounts of people (about 62% in 2004 according to Heather Mason Kiefer) argue that animal testing is necessary in order to produce safe products. On the contrary, several studies have found these methods to be questionable. They lack accurate, safe results.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Dbq

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animals pass to many cruelties, they suffer and live a miserable life. NO animal should pass all that suffering…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a result of this, nine out of every ten trial medicines that look safe and appear to be effective on animals, fail when they are given to humans. Because animals don’t react the same way as humans, not only do the failed tests delay medical progress, but also they are a waste of animal’s lives, and a waste of money that is spent into the research and tests. Animals have different anatomic, cellular, and metabolic structures than humans have. If a new product is passed just because it is safe on animals and isn’t on humans, that could be a very dangerous situation. One instance when this occurred was in 1950 when a sleeping pill worked on animals but when given to humans it caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe birth defects. Another time, a drug for arthritis was safe on mice but when administered to humans caused 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths. Animal testing can make researchers oversea potential cures and treatments. Some substances that are harmful to animals, are helpful to humans. For example, aspirin is dangerous to some animals. Arthur Allen says, “A source of human suffering may be the dozens of promising drugs that get shelved when they cause problems in animals that may not be relevant for humans.” (“Of Mice or Men: The Problems with Animal Testing”). Of all the medicines that pass animal trials and are ready for human…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most religious people care about animals as god created them however each person’s view and take on things is different. For most of time Christians largely ignored animal suffering they believed that human beings were greatly superior to animals. They taught that human beings could treat animals as badly as they wanted to because people had few obligations towards animals. They believed that it was okay for the animals to be used and exploited so that humans could be benefited. They did not care if the animals were and the point of extinction just as long as they got what they needed. As they thought they had no soul.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, everything about animal testing is very unethical and immoral. Many people are aware that animal testing goes on, but most people don't know the extremes that scientists will go to for research purposes. The sad truth is that if most people actually…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research shows that 26 million animals have been used for testing of all different kinds. 26 million animals have been put through wringer for the sake of a human. 26 million animals have had no say, defense, or chance to save themselves. Animals are used as human experiments to see if a certain product can work or not. Animal testing is wrong on many different levels. If humans are not willing to use, test and experiment on themselves, why should one be allowed to test on an animal who has no say in what happens.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Animal Testing

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use is up. Some are injured and will still live the remainder of their life in captivity. The doctors will not do anything to help the animals that are in pain that happen to be the reason because of them. It is the aspect of animals testing that many view as a major negative against the practice, as it seems that the animal died in vain because no direct benefit to humans occurred. Even though animals and humans have many things in common like how we both have the same organ system, there are also many things that are different between animals and humans. Many animals cannot handle or take the same medication as humans, most the surgeries that are operated on animals are just too strong for an animal to take so they end up dying or sick for the rest of their lives. (Animal Testing…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing - 18

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Regulatory agencies across the globe make it mandatory for companies to get their 'products' tested for toxicity before making them available in the market. These 'products', which range from prescription drugs to cosmetics, are tested on animals to check for the degree of skin irritation, skin penetration, eye irritation, carcinogenicity, etc. On the basis of these tests, it is determined whether the said product is fit for human use or not.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a cruel and ineffective medical practice that produces unreliable results that should be illegal and those laboratories should use safer alternatives that will provide more accurate results.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing Is Bad

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nearly 3% of animals survive the animal testing. Some of the animals they research on either die, get brain damage, lose an arm or a leg,and feel discomfort. That is why I feel animal testing is wrong. Some might believe that animal research is good because of shampoo, hair dye, conditioner.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    So that means that some believe animal testing is unreliable. This could be because the animals are in an unnatural environment they could be under a lot of stress, causing their bodies to react differently to the drug being tested. Therefore, they won 't react to the drugs in the same way compared to their potential reaction in a natural environment.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many of the new alternatives methods can range from using 3-D models of the human body or even using real life human subjects which can be donated for the use of science. A skin equivalent can be comparable to the natural skin of humans and therefore it is an alternative method to animal testing (Mertsching, Weimer, Kersen, & Brunner, 1/4). The Authors indicate that the skin equivalent is generated out of human keratinocytes on a collagen substrate containing human dermal fibroblast (Mertching et al., 2/4). For the alternative method, it allows for applications of testing of an array of drugs and products used for daily life without using animals and produce accurate results because of how close the resemblance is and the biological structure to humans. Some of the test they can do on the skin can be used for testing the various parts of the body and different symptoms. With animal testing coming under fire and criticism scientists try to find ways to not use animals. A different approach of animal testing was taken by Unilever in collaboration with Entelos Inc. Which is a computer based-mathematical model (Vandebriel, & Loveren 397). The use of a computer based models will help obtain the understandings of the tests the scientists do without using any animals. With computers they can create a model of the human body and use the info they gathered to construct a model that will be accurate when testing. They can also get info about the knowledge gap also they will be able to integrate the different ways using the alternative testing data. With the data they can put together the info they gathered with the other testing methods to make a model on the computer that will be more…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poor defenseless animals fight for their lives every day to test out products they have no use for. These poor sweet creatures have been taken away their right to live to be caged and mistreated and they can’t do anything but sit there and take it. Day to day, more and more animals are dying at the cruel hands of these scientists. Animal Testing is an act of animal cruelty, because it is inhumane, there are other methods that can be used to avoid harming…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays