Preview

Arguments Against Animal Testing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
464 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Animal Testing
Each year, more than 100 million animals are killed in lab for product testing. Now a days, scientists are using animals for their research and testings, and I disagree with the use of animals. It is unfair to animals because in the end it kills them, it may not actually work on humans, and the cost of it. I am against the use of animals for product testing for a lot of reasons. I am against using animals because I think it is cruel to animals because if it a test went wrong then then it could cause a harmless animal to die or seriously disable them. Also in animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the remainder of their lives in captivity. Living …show more content…

So that means that some believe animal testing is unreliable. This could be because the animals are in an unnatural environment they could be under a lot of stress, causing their bodies to react differently to the drug being tested. Therefore, they won 't react to the drugs in the same way compared to their potential reaction in a natural environment. One more reason I am against the use of animals for product testing is because of the cost of it. Animal testing generally costs an enormous amount of money, as the animals must be fed, housed, cared for and treated with drugs or a similar experimental substance. On top of that, animal testing may occur more than once and over the course of months, which means that additional costs are acquired. The price of animals themselves must also be factored into the equation. There are companies who breed animals specifically for testing and animals can be purchased through them. Overall, I am against the use of animals because it is cruel to animals, it may not work, and the cost of it. Using animals for product testing is inhumane and unfair. I would never want my own pet used for product testing, nor would any one

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Overall, animal testing is erroneous because it does not contribute anything meaningfully to the world. When animals are tested often the results are irrelevant, due to the fact, animals have many differences from humans. Also, the animals endure poor conditions. Lastly, the animals’ lives are wasted by being tested on products that are not important. Testing animals is abusive and needs to…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hey hey

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cosmetic and drug companies continually face opposition due to the fact that they use animals for the testing of their products. Some feel that this procedure goes against the rights which are given to all living beings, including animals, while others see the positive impact that animal testing brings to the lives of human beings.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing is unreliable. Some may say animals are appropriate test subjects because they are similar to humans. Professor Paul Furlong states that "it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human.". So testing on animals wont always be accurate. Cruelty Free International says that animals do not get as many of the diseases that we do, like Parkinson's disease and many forms of cancer. CFI also says that using mice and rats as test subjects was accurate 43% of the time. This shows that we can't rely on animals to test our products and drugs because they react differently. CFI claims, "Out of 93 drug side effects, only 19% could have been predicted by animals, the study found.".…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is wasteful, useless, and dangerous. The experiments that are done on these animals are gruesome. Bountiful amounts of people (about 62% in 2004 according to Heather Mason Kiefer) argue that animal testing is necessary in order to produce safe products. On the contrary, several studies have found these methods to be questionable. They lack accurate, safe results.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first reason why we shouldn’t have animal testing is because animals are getting hurt or abused. “Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year.” The chemicals that the people are using are burning or other worse things to them. The chemicals that they use on the animals could hurt or kill them. Over half of side effects cannot be detected in…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Inaccurate

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most animal testing is very inaccurate because human beings have different chemistry than animals, some animals are similar to humans but they have gaps that can prevent or make false cures that can do more harm than help that is why animals are given medicine that people are not prescribed. “U.S. Food and Drug Administration found that 92 percent of drugs entering clinical trials following animal testing fail to be approved. Of those approved, half are withdrawn…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To test cosmetics, household cleaners and other consumer products hundreds of thousands of animals are poisoned, blinded and killed every year by cruel corporations. In my opinion we should not even be doing this at all, it is very wrong.Thousands of animals are killed everyday due to this torture. Animals have feelings too. Toothpaste is even tested on animals. It’s ridiculous. According to the human society, registration of a single pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of 12,000 animals. The animals are tested for 2 years.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animals can not talk, so therefore they have no say in what happens to them and what doesn’t happen to them. It would be like testing on a human who can not talk, it isn't fair.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether it helps researchers to find new drugs and treatments suitable for humans. Whereas some are convinced that it does help researchers find new drugs and treatments, others maintain that some drugs tested on animals may never actually be useful or even safe for human consumption. In my own view the results of animals testing are unreliable because animals and humans are not genetically or anatomically alike to one another.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Against Animal Testing

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In these experiments, there are tons of sources of error. They do not live in a human-like environment, instead they are confined and distressed. Secondly, researchers deliberately infect the animals with diseases they would not normally contract, after being healthy to begin with. Many drugs have varying results between different animals, and animals and humans. For example, penicillin kills guinea pigs, but does nothing to rabbits. According to the food and drug administration, 92% of drugs that pass animal tests fail human tests. Some chemicals that are harmful to animals are okay for humans, as well as the other way around. Animals are being sacrificed for experiments that don’t even have accurate or useful results. If the regulations for the environment test animals live in are enforced, it can reduce some of the factors that make an experiment not a fair…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pro Animal Testing

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Yes, despite all the negative aspects, I am pro animal testing. These tests are not performed for no reason; they are performed in order to find drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine, and treat illnesses for both humans and animals. By testing animals, scientists have saved countless lives. In fact, research states that it is a fact that the white rat has saved more lives than the calling of 911. Had it not been for animal testing, terminal diseases like tuberculosis and cholera would still be around, and the medical treatments that we use today wouldn't exist, and the development of future breakthroughs would be limited.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is common knowledge that many animals are used in medical and scientific research. These innocent animals are often obliged to undergo countless of cruel processes and endure great suffering as a result. Despite all the disputes and discussions regarding whether or not animal testing is actually necessary, they wouldn't change the fact that it is, in fact, an extremely cruel thing to do.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Surprisingly enough, a voluminous amount of companies worldwide are relying on harmless animal testing to make products that you use every day. Businesses such as Band-Aid brand, Colgate, Pert, and even Revlon use this process to make your favorite items that are vital to healing skin, help you to clean your teeth, and keep your hair clean. It is known that animal testing can sometimes be cruel for the animal, but that is only a small percentage of the animals being tested on. Undeniably, animal testing should be allowed because there are many laws protecting the animals being tested on, new vital medicines come from theses harmless tests, and most if the time the animal being tested on benefits from the test being performed.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing has been a topic of debate for many generations. It is difficult to imagine a common house hold pet subjected to extreme procedures of the mildest and painless form to the harshest form imaginable. I am talking about your average mouse, rabbit, cat or dog. At the same time, consumers want to be assured they are using the safest products available, and people want science to find cures for life-threatening diseases. Lately, science has tried to prove out theories and hypnosis through computer algorithms but we still have to rely on physical subjects like the animals referenced. There is no public argument that says we should not test products before entering the market, the debate is the method by which these products should be tested. Animal testing is necessary for biomedical research, but should be eradicated for vanity reasons in terms of cosmetics.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only does animal testing hurt the animals they use, but it could ultimately kill them. Most often primates are used for nor logical testing which is testing on the brain (Jeory n.p.). Testing on the brain is highly dangerous and most likely ends in failure and the blood of innocent creatures in on the scientist's hands. Testing on animals is a highly dangerous game to play and sadly most companies do not care how many they kill before finding a combination of their product that actually…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays