Preview

Sociological Theory: Karl Marx: Major Features of Capitalist Mode of Production

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4052 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sociological Theory: Karl Marx: Major Features of Capitalist Mode of Production
Sociological Theory: Karl Marx: Major features of capitalist mode of production Introduction.

Karl Marx is one of the outstanding and influential social scientists of the 19th century, an undeniable founder of modern social science. Some critics, however, believe that Marx was not an original thinker and that his claim to recognition lies in the fact of his remarkable synthesis of German Philosophy, French Sociology and English Economics of his time. He collected the stray and isolated thoughts in these fields and constructed a coherent intellectual mansion for academic enlightenment and practical application, very much according to his own design. Hegel 's dialectical process or principle of development through thesis, anti-thesis and synthesis provided the philosophical background for his theory of historical development through 'contradiction and conflict '. However, he replaced Hegel 's notion of the development of the 'Idea ' through the dialectical process to its final and highest form with the 'Materialism ' of Feuerbach and introduced the concept of dialectical materialism to explain the historical process through 'class war '. He derived both the phrase and the concept of "class war" from French socialists like Saint-Simon and Charles Fourier. On the Economics side, Marx adopted in its entirety the Ricardian theory that labor was the source of value and developing it drew conclusions which Ricardo might have disdained. Thus, in short, Marx 's social theory consists of three parts, with a fourth one thrown in later, and very ingeniously interwoven to present a coherent picture of a social organization, at once dynamic and in a state of flux. First is a philosophy of history anchored in the theory of Dialectical Materialism, which is manifested in a recurring class war in which the negation of the negation produces ever new negations. Secondly, there is the economic analysis which gives an exposition of a theory of value in an attempt to discover the



References: M. Blaug, Ricardian Economics. A Historical Study Greenwood Press, 1973 Freedman, Robert, 1961, Marx on Economics, Ed.., Penguin Books, England, 1961 Hegel, G.W.F. Science of Logic, trans. A.V. Miller, Allen & Unwin, 1969 Leibknecht, W. `Reminiscences of Marx ', in Marx and Engels Through the Eyes of their Contemporaries, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1972 Lenin, V.I. `A Great Beginning ' and `Left Wing ' Communism, in Selected Works (one volume), Lawrence & Wishart, 1969 Marx, K. Critique of the Gotha Programme, FLP, Peking, 1976. From: Radical Philosophy (Spring 1980) Marx, K. The Poverty of Philosophy, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1966. Letter to P.V. Annenkov, in Poverty of Philosophy Karl Marx, Preface and Introduction to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, FLP, Peking, 1976. Marx, K, Critique of the Gotha Programme, FLP, Peking, 1976. From: Radical Philosophy 24 (Spring 1980) Marx, K. Capital, Vol. I, Penguin Books, England Marx, K and Engels, F. Communist Manifesto, Martin Lawrence, London, 1933 Resnick and Wolff, Knowledge and Class, University of Chicago Press, 1987. Ricardo, David, (1999). Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817) (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall. 1999 Wakefield, Edward Gibbon. (2006). In Britannica Student Encyclopedia. Retrieved November 4, 2006, from Encyclopædia Britannica Online: http://www.britannica.com/ebi/article-9277635

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After discussing influence of Marx, author tells the circumstances in which Marx’s social theory came into existence. Marx drew his inspiration from Hegel idealistic philosophy. He was also influenced by English economist Adam Smith and David Ricardo. In the year 1842-43 Marx became the editor of Rheinische Zeintung. During the editorship of Rheinische Zeintung, Marx wrote articles on the freedom of press and against the law which restrict the peasants from wood-gathering from forest. He also wrote about the plight of worker, finally, this paper was banned. Marx travelled from one country to another in Europe and observed the societies very closely; all these visits helped him in the formulation of social theory.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx and Walmart

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Marx, K. (1963) Preface to A contribution to the Critique of Political Economy; trans. T.B. Bottomore and…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx’s social theory is today known as Marxist historical materialism, though throughout his life Marx referred to it as ‘the materialist conception of history.’ Born in 1818, in a small town in the south of the German Rhineland, to a middle class Jewish family, Marx had a comfortable start to his life. Home schooled until the age of 13, he then enrolled at the Faculty of Law at the University of Bonn at 17 before his poor grades lead to his father forcing him to transfer to the increasingly academic University of Berlin. Hegelianism was prominent in Berlin at this time and thus this is where Marx’s interest in social theory began; the theoretical writings of Georg Hegel would influence him throughout his life time. This point is reiterated by Ken Morrison,…

    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern economic society can be described as a combination of certain points from several theories combined into one. Changing dynamics and economic needs of nations has spawned a development of various, and contrasting, economic systems throughout the world. Perhaps the two most contrasting philosophies seen in existence today are that of capitalism and communism. The two philosophers most notably recognized for their views on these economic systems are Adam Smith and Karl Marx. This paper will identify several fundamental aspects of economic philosophy as described by Smith and Marx, and will compare and contrast the views of these philosophers in relation to current global economic systems.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It begins with the view of history as a class struggle. With Karl Marx’s view of history class struggle, there are two classes in constant battle. First it was the master slave relationship, then follows peasant and nobility, on down to the bourgious and the proletarait. It was a struggle between the oppressed and the oppressor, the owner and the owned. One class exploited the other because their relationships were completely opposed. This would create a merchant class and a working class from the struggle between the peasant and the nobility. But Marx and Engles felt that at some point the working class would eliminate all the remaining classes. If there was only one class, there wouldn’t be a class struggle. There would no longer be a need for money, religion, nation-states and governments. Marx and Engels actually believed that they had discovered a method that could be applied in a scientific manner to the businesses of the world.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    unit 7 p1

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marxism was introduced and studied by Karl Marx during 1818 and 1883. The Marxist view is based on the conflicts and interests of the society, it also strongly highlights on the importance of conflict in societies and communities. They also believe that economics are the bases of progressing and social life this can be achieved by struggling through social classes. The two classes that Marx discussed about were the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie class is a small powerful group who may have owned factories or own companies whereas the Proletariat is a poorer group of workers. The way a Marxists thinks is based on the financial structures and systems as well as social class meaning that these factors are vital in the Marxist view.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    His theory covers the culture, politics, economics and industrialization of his time. He called the leading role of the social parts of each individual societies superstructures. In Marx 's eyes there were two classes: The Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat. The upper class, more wealthy, Bourgeoisie, had the smaller more powerful aristocratic class. On the other hand, the Proletariat are less skilled lower class workers that are the majority. Do to the separation of these two classes the Bourgeoisie own all the means of production and have the rights to all the riches. They have the power to influence there thoughts and beliefs in society because of their economic and social dominance (Rigauer, 2000).…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern political economic theory and philosophy can be greatly attributed to the works of two men who seemingly held polar opposite views on the subject. Adam Smith, a Scottish philosopher, published his most well known work An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations in 1776 and is most often associated with the ideas and principles of the political economic system known as Capitalism. At the other end of the spectrum is Karl Marx; the German philosopher most often associated with Communism and the author (or co-author) of The Communist Manifesto. This paper seeks to discuss the core differences in their respective political economic philosophies with regards to what economic value is and what the role of government should be in their versions of political economy. This will conclude with the argument that while Smith's work had laid the foundation for modern economic philosophy, it was Marx who would ultimately leave the most significant impression upon the world with his revolutionary ideas.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Invisible Man

    • 4262 Words
    • 18 Pages

    In The Communist Manifesto, published in 1848, was the starting point for the ideology of communism. Karl Heinrich Marx, the “Father” of communism and the most influential socialist in the 19th century, collaborated with Friedrich Engels, a friend and partner, in order to create this (adjective) work. Both socialist, Marx and Engels believed “that private property caused inequality in society and that governments should control their nation’s economy so that the basic needs of people could be satisfied.” (Lansford 14)…

    • 4262 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx is regarded by many as the first social scientist ever. Although it is argued that Adam Smith was the first great economist, and David Ricardo the first great modern economist, Marx is undoubtedly the economist that has had the biggest impact on economic history. It was he that masterminded the concept of a socialist utopia, which ultimately led to over a third of the world been ruled under the communist regime , a model that Marx concocted. Born on 5 May 1818, in Trier, one of Germany's oldest cities, Marx was the first economist who infused history, philosophy, economics, sociology and political theory all into his work. Marx was ahead of his time, his theories were ground breaking, only time would tell whether his predictions would come to fruition. Marx's main claim was that capitalism would eventually fall due to its own internal contradictions and faults, to be replaced by a socialist utopia, so to speak. Marx had many complex motives behind the eventual fall of capitalism, he delves in to great detail about these reasons in his masterpiece Capital (1867), in this text Marx writes about how the capitalist system will falter over time due to the way it operates. It is these faults of the capitalist system that are brought in to question when analysing an issue of this nature, what weaknesses did Marx identify in his writings and were these weaknesses evident in the capitalist system come the end of the twentieth century?…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the mid 1800’s two men by the names of Karl Marx and Friedrech Engels wrote a book called “The Communist Manifesto”. In this book Marx proposed that capitalism was a system full of flaws and…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human relationships have always been dynamic. Change and adaptability have gone hand in hand with the passing of time for human society. Karl Marx's views on Industrialization and the bourgeoisie had a major impact on how we view our industrial alignment today. Marx and Engel's The Communist Manifesto gives broad views on the subject of the middle class and how they fit into a society that was ruled by feudalism and aristocracy. Capitalism becomes a major topic in a socialist-based society that underwent many changes as industrialization progressed. A government must be dynamic in its nature reflecting the change in society. At times aristocracy has refused to allow society to adapt to the changes that the bourgeoisie…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    So according to him the historical epochs, Primitive Communism, Slavery, Feudalism and Capitalism were unlike each other because of the different modes of production. This theory of his is referred to as a historical materialism because “he focuses on the material (economic) conditions in society and how these determine social structures and social relations” (Dillon 2010: 35). Similarly, for a progressive change there should be some kind of conflict. If everything in a society is as harmonious and as prosperous as told by early functionalist theorists, there would have been no requirement of change in a society. Marx talks about functions but with a conflict and change. Marx believed there is always a tension in a society that leads to conflict and then a change. To support this theory of his he has taken a concept of “dialectical” change from Hegel. Hegel defined this dialectical process of change in consciousness or idea whereas Marx implied the same on material aspect. Unlike Hegel, he believed that it was matter, which shaped the consciousness. He retained the notion of dialectics but gave it a new significance in a more grounded social theory. In a dialectic process, a thesis (existing idea) and an antithesis (opposing idea) come into a conflict and because of this there is an emergence of synthesis (a new progressive idea). In a capitalist society, as Michele Dillon says, “…existing material conditions (eg. Capitalist class inequality – the thesis) produce opposition (class revolt – antithesis) which in turn leads to a new economic system (communism – the synthesis)” [2010: 37].Marx says the process also happened in other societies with different modes of production (i.e. slavery and feudalism). May be that is the reason he says history of all existing society is a history of class struggle. “According…

    • 2166 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Karl Marx, like Gilman and Du Bois was interested in seeing society change. Karl Marx was interested in seeing a classless society in which capitalism was abolished. Karl Marx saw the world with a materialist view and the first “to develop the structural method, without which there could be no social theory...”(Lemert 2007; pp 49). Through this, Marx was able to to structurally analyze the world he was living in; a world in capitalism was beginning to flourish. He saw society on a macro level, which meant he saw society as a whole. Since Marx longed for a classless society, he first analyzed the current situation he was in. He concluded that capitalism was inherently exploitive since it alienates workers from their labor and the goods they produce (the workers have no say in their workplace and do not own what they produce). His materialist view of the world is apparent in the Communist Manifesto in which he says that class conflict is what makes history, that is, real events instead of ideas like the idealist view.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays