Marx (1818-1883) held a negative view of religion; he compared it to ideological framework that had become a method of social control used by the ruling class to exert their domination over the lower class. There is much evidence to support the Marxist theory as excerpts from the bible make suggestions of non-resistance, offering eternal bliss in the afterlife. However Max Weber (1864 –1914) proposed that That Calvinism could have actually been the driving force for today’s capitalism in his book ‘Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism’. Marx often suggested that religious dogma helped to subdue the working class and justify the unequal distribution of money and power within a capitalist society. He described religion as, ‘the opiate of the masses’ (Giddens,2009)
Marx work was influenced by the work of Auguste Comte (1798–1857) who was a main protagonist in social thinking in the 19th century. According to Giddens (2009) Comte had previously noted the inequalities that would arise during industrialisation and agreed with Marx in that religion would eventually begin to decline with the advancements of science and rational thought. In contrast of Marx’s idea to over throw the system in favour of a non-exploitive communist society, Comte vision was for sociology to become a ‘positive science’. He believed that the world would have to pass through the theological, metaphysical and positive stages in order to abandon religion in favour of science. The theological stage was said to be blind faith in god’s will, the metaphysic stage would be the abandonment of supernatural thinking and the positive stage would be the acceptance of science over religion to answer the questions of the universe. In the philosophical system of positivism, positive scientific principles and empirical evidence would be used to find the answers. (Livesey, 2011) It has been argued that since religion has not been abandoned completely in the light of scientific reasoning, it must play an important role in social life and is not just be used as a form of knowledge regarding the social world (Fulcher & Scott 2009).
Functionalist Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) also foresaw a possible decline in religion and focus on science but not to the same extent as Comte. He argued that religion was a necessary integrating force that helped in creating a collective consciousness in society where people shared common values and beliefs. Unlike Marx theory of conflict, Durkheim concluded from his work on Totenism that religion was an important part of developing social cohesion amongst the members of society. Although his ideas seem plausible there is growing evidence to suggest that religion has been used as a force against social order, which can be seen when observing recent Christian and Islamic fundamentalist groups, which are often working against the interests of society (Fulcher & Scott).
Like Weber, Neo Marxist Otto Maduro, (1945) disagreed with Durkheim and Marx stating that religion was not a conservative force and that religion and ideology can be free from one another. He used an example of the Catholic Church in Latin America which denies notable oppression and exploitation between the higher and lower classes and even suggests that the priests will go against the capitalists in the defence of the oppressed. The lower classes would use the church to work for them. Leading to the development of liberation theology (Harlembos & Holborn)
According to postmodernists, Comte, Marx and Durkheim failed to recognise that science would not be able to explain everything. Arguably the failing of science, with regards to incurable diseases, has led to a disbelief of scientific explanations and a return to religion. Zygmunt Baumen (1992) Suggested that in a postmodern society there would be an end of ideology, gaining freedom of choice in which faith they would like to follow. Jean Francois Lyotard (1984) agreed with Bauman and even suggested that in today’s society people could mix and match their religious faiths, accepting and declining to suit their lifestyle or preference. He felt that unlike Comte’s ‘scientific positivism’ ideas of absolute truth, conventional science was limited, partial with no stand point being fixed and all thought to have relevance. According to Jean Baudrillard (1929–2007) Cultural products and images are being consumed and used to define reality in people’s lives with the abandonment of scientific knowledge (Fulcher & Scott) Marxist thinker Alex Callinicos (1989) disagrees with thinkers such as leotard and Baudrillard, arguing postmodernism is bred from political frustration and lacks an acceptance of economic globalisation.(Harlembos 2008)
Marxist feminists also see religion an oppressive force, suggesting that religion was used as a tool to reinforce patriarchy and keep women’s position lower than that of a man. (Self & Starbuck) The Christian faith negatively portrays woman as evil, whores and anti-Christ. They should not be seen equal to men; the following citation from the Old Testament is strikingly similar to the treatment of some women in Islamic Saudi woman today.
Deuteronomy 22:13-21 (English standard version Anglicised)
‘He may not divorce her all his days. 20 But if the thing is true, that evidence of virginity was not found in the young woman, 21 then they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father 's house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones, because she has done an outrageous thing in Israel by whoring in her father 's house. So you shall purge the evil from your midst.
This essay has critically evaluated the contrasting ideas from thinkers such as Mark, Comte, and Durkheim with regards to science ideology and religion. It has put forward the ideas of neo-Marxist Otto Maduro, postmodernist perspectives from Jean Braudillard and Jean François Leotard, giving a critique from Marxist Alex Callinicos. Finally if not ironically it briefly outlines the feminist view of women’s position in society.
Word Count 982
References
Alex Callicancos (1998) Against Postmodernism, St Martin press, New York
Chris Livesy (2011) Marxist views on religion, Availible at: http://www.sociology.org.uk/cload.htm accessed on 14/03/2011
Fulcher and Scott (2007) Sociology, Oxford University Press, New York
Giddens. A, (1999) Sociology, 6th ed, polity press, Cambridge
Harlembos & Holborn 2008, Sociology themes and perspectives 7th ed, Hammersmith, London
Lawson, T (2003) Complete A-Z sociology handbook, Greengate publishing services, Kent
Selfe, P & Starbuck M. (1998) Religion, Houder and Stoughton, London
The Old Testament, Deuteronomy 22:13-21 (English standard version Anglicised)
References: Alex Callicancos (1998) Against Postmodernism, St Martin press, New York Chris Livesy (2011) Marxist views on religion, Availible at: http://www.sociology.org.uk/cload.htm accessed on 14/03/2011 Fulcher and Scott (2007) Sociology, Oxford University Press, New York Giddens. A, (1999) Sociology, 6th ed, polity press, Cambridge Harlembos & Holborn 2008, Sociology themes and perspectives 7th ed, Hammersmith, London Lawson, T (2003) Complete A-Z sociology handbook, Greengate publishing services, Kent Selfe, P & Starbuck M. (1998) Religion, Houder and Stoughton, London The Old Testament, Deuteronomy 22:13-21 (English standard version Anglicised)
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the view that religion is a force for social change
There are two primary views on the issue of whether religion is a force for social change in society. Certain theorists adopt the view that religion is a conservative force, maintaining the status quo, whereas other theorists have the belief that religion is a force for social change, bringing about revolutions in society. With all views, the lack of a universal definition of religion remains a problem. Marx for example would argue that religion inhibits social change as it legitimises and justifies the status quo, whereas this contrasts Weber’s belief would be that religion can cause social change as it helped the development of capitalism.…
- 562 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
* Marxists Disagree: Religion functions serve capitalism. Karl Marx – sees religion as an ideology that is used as a weapon by the ruling class to justify suffering of poor as ‘god-given’…
- 527 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Kuyper Perspective Although several of his augments complimentary to Kuyper’s, Marx’s methods for ending poverty are extremely different. Marx views the French Revolution as a positive event and advocates the distribution of property and the abolishment of the family structure. These radical ideas suggest that he possesses a distorted understanding of human nature. Moreover, Marx’s Communism completely disregards God’s authority and places man’s reason at the center of his worldview. Christians should abstain from embracing these ideas as they are based primarily on scientific reasoning without the support of biblical principles.…
- 1168 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Theoretical approaches in general help us understand the concepts of religion that both our society has created and societies before ours. Two theoretical approaches to “religion” that would help understand ancient cultures would be Archaeology and History. Archaeologist would look closely at artifacts and past civilizations to understand the way they practice or believed in religion. Where as Historians would examine the language that was spoke, which would then correlate to the stories being told and the texts that came from a specific culture, traditions and decrees. Many may say that the archaeological approach to understanding religion has more evidence since the way these individuals look at religion have tangible objects opposed to the…
- 761 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Religion has held an important role in society since the beginning of civilisation and it has such power over people’s minds and shape the way our world developed. Whilst some sociological theories such as functionalist sees religion as performing a positive function in society as it can lead to social solidarity, integrating people into society, other sociological theories such as Marxist and Feminist totally disagrees with this and would argue that religion leads to instability and conflict in society.…
- 1094 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Langley, P. Pilkington, A. & Richardson, J (2007) Sociology in Focus A2 Level. Causeway Press.…
- 2649 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
small part of this complex phenomenon we call religion (Roberts, 1990). Sociology focuses on the social dimension of religion and on those aspects of religion affecting social behaviour (Roberts, 1990). Like the developmental psychologist who studies the child to discover the stages of personality development in all children, sociologist will be looking for the common patterns, the general rules, rather than for a unique characteristics of each religion, and looking at unique characteristics, it is to find how those characteristics affect behaviour in special ways (Roberts, 1990).…
- 191 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Macionis J & Plummer, K 2012, Sociology: a global introduction, 5th edn, Pearson Prentice Hall, Harlow.…
- 1108 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
The term “religiosity” was used by social scientists in order to indicate the extent, commitment, devotion and faithfulness of a person’s participation and practice of his or her religion (Gay and Lynxwiler, 2013). According to Ayenibiowo and Ayeni (2013), religiosity, in its narrowest sense, deals more with how religious an individual is and less with how religious an individual in terms of ritual, symbols and doctrines. On the other hand, religiosity, in its broadest sense, is a multifaceted construct pertaining to various religious activities, devotions and beliefs.…
- 475 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Haralambos, M., & Holborn, M. (1995) Sociology : themes and perspectives - 4th edition. London : Collins Educational…
- 3003 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
A religion can be seen as a unified system of beliefs and practices which are relative to sacred things and beliefs (Giddens 1972, p.224). It can shape ones thoughts and feelings and gives people a sense of hope and something to believe in. All three main sociologist writers Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim offer different perspectives on religion and how important it is to society. Some of the theorists chose to have a positive view whilst others argue the unimportance of religion. This essay attempts to discover which theorist has the most accurate perspective of religion in modern times. This is done by firstly explaining the basic ideas regarding to religion put forward by Marx, Weber and Durkheim. Then both Marx's and Durkheim's thought will be compared and contrasted in order to determine the differences and similarities between their ideas. Finally, it will be explained which one of the theorists views and ideas are the most relevant to contemporary times and why.…
- 1387 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Marx, Durkheim and Weber each had different sociological views of the role and function of Religion. My preferred theorists view’s on Religion is Karl Marx’s as I feel his ideas are more relevant to what Religion actually is. And I have chosen Marx’s theory on Religion as I feel that it is the most similar to my own views on the subject. His views are more interesting to me as I don’t practise any Religion and his views expand on some of my own thoughts that I have had about Religion. It also has more relevance in society today as people are now struggling due to the economic down turn which is completely testing people’s faith. There is a bigger decline in this century as most of the population of the world have more resources and freedom of speech, to decide how they really feel about Religion and aren’t blind-sighted by the church anymore. Even if people are not aware of Marx’s ideas about Religion I feel that the majority of people would have similar views based on these ideas as times have gotten harder thus making people question their own beliefs. I will also briefly outline each of the theorist’s workings on Religion and then discuss why I chose Karl Marx’s theories.…
- 1002 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The role of education is to educate individuals within society and to prepare them for working life in the economy, also to integrate individuals and teach them the norms, values and roles within society. There are many different sociological theories that differ within the role of education within society that attempt to try and explain how society or aspects of society work together. Different theories try and attempt to understand social behaviour at different levels of investigation. There are several perspectives on the sociology of education that are important. The two perspectives which are going to be looked at are Functionalism and Marxism.…
- 1581 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
¡§Mead was to claim that ¡¥human behaviour could not be reduced to biological or physiological states¡¦. Evaluate this claim with reference to Mead¡¦s concepts of the ¡¥I¡¦ and the ¡¥me¡¦.¡¨…
- 1226 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Emile Durkheim explored the scientific realm of sociology and how it related to religion. He viewed the defining feature of religion as the concept of the sacred. This conclusion was gathered after he had engaged in fieldwork with the Australian aboriginal people as he contrasted their worship of totems with religion in the West. No matter the cause of religion, it stemmed from a social area. Religion stood on the base of society and when the religion went through a change, consequently so did that society.…
- 500 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays