Preview

Socrates Vs Crito

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2078 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates Vs Crito
In the reading CRITO the verdict of execution has already been given and now Socrates and colleagues must make the decision to flee the city of Athens or stay and face his fate. In this conversation you have Critos point of view and Socrates. Based on Critos reasoning he states three reasons why Socrates should stay, the first two being selfish but the third hitting home.
Critos first argument is that if Socrates does not get away, then he will hurt crito in two ways
A. Crito will lose a great friend when Socrates is killed
B. His notoriety will be harmed.
Individuals won't realize that Socrates stayed in prison. They'll feel that it was workable for Crito to get Socrates out however that he didn't do it in light of the fact that he wasn't …show more content…
What will they think if Socrates is not in charge of his kids? Socrates contends that the conclusion of a specialist is more essential than the sentiment of the dominant part. He gives the sample of somebody in preparing. Such a man does not pay consideration on the counsel of the overall population, however to his coach. In the event that he listened to popular assessment (take steroids, eat whatever you need, train 20 hours a day), he could hurt his body. Socrates extends the relationship to settling on what the right route is to act. On the off chance that we listen to the larger part instead of specialists we could hurt our souls, the some portion of us that is mangled by wrong activities and profited by right ones(Crito, 47a-48a). Socrates concedes that as a greater part, the overall population has the ability to kill individuals, yet he expresses that the most essential thing is not living, but rather carrying on with a decent life, so it is not worth after the assessment of the dominant part in the event that it means relinquishing something that is critical for living a decent life.(48b) . The above is one of Socrates' most key standards - that the truly critical thing is not to live but rather to live well. Thusly he considers whether it is ethically right to pay off the watchmen and escape. Socrates starts considering so as to tend to this issue the results for the city of Athens. He says that the laws and the city could be crushed on the off chance that he got away. Lawful judgments could lose their power in the event that they were invalidated by private nationals, and a city without laws would not stay in place for
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Crito Worksheet
    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plato's Crito Worksheet

    1. In paragraphs 43-46a, Crito gives Socrates a number of reasons why he should escape. State one of them in your own words. He will be killed un-honorably.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Reputation Of Socrates In The Five Dialogues By Crito
    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Reputation Of Socrates In The Five Dialogues By Crito

    The teachings of Socrates in Plato’s The Five Dialogues provide an answer to the dilemma of the portly fella. The book of Crito portrays the scene of Socrates in his jail cell awaiting execution when he’s approached by an old friend, Crito, a philosopher and nobleman with sufficient funds to help Socrates escape from his prison cell. Crito repeatedly argues with Socrates in an attempt to convince him to flee his cell. The first argument that Crito presents is his argument of reputation in which he states, “Surely there can be no worse reputation than to value money more highly than one’s friends, for the majority will not believe that you yourself were not willing to leave prison while we were eager for you to do so.” Crito is essentially saying that that people will think that Crito chose his money over saving Socrates to which Socrates simply rebuts, “My good Crito, why should we care so much for what the majority think? The most reasonable people, to whom one should pay more attention, will believe that things were done as they were done” (Plato, Five Dialogues; Crito: pg. 47). Effectively Socrates is saying that Crito shouldn’t concern himself with the majority but with the reasonable because the reasonable see it the way it is. Crito then responds saying that the majority has the power to inflict the greatest evils, which in this case is death for Socrates, “You see Socrates, that one must also pay attention to the opinion of the majority. Your present situation makes clear that the majority can inflict not the least but pretty well the greatest evils if one is slandered among them” (Plato, Five Dialogues; Crito: pg. 47). In the portly fella case, you must be reasonable, and the reasonable thing is to not push the portly fella onto the tracks. A reasonable person wouldn’t even think to murder somebody in order save others, especially when you share no association with the other…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Plato's Five Dialogues: Socrates Was Not Guilty
    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Plato's Five Dialogues: Socrates Was Not Guilty

    Socrates looks to the priest to tell him what exactly is pious so that he may educate himself as to why he would be perceived as impious. Found in the Apology, another of Plato's Five Dialogues, Socrates aims to defend his principles to the five hundred and one person jury. Finally, the Crito, an account of Socrates' final discussion with his good friend Crito, Socrates is offered an opportunity to escape the prison and his death sentence. As is known, Socrates rejected the suggestion. It is in the Euthyphro and the Apology that it can be deduced that Socrates is not guilty as charged, he had done nothing wrong and he properly defended himself. However, in the Crito, it is shown that Socrates is guilty only in the interpretation and enforcement of Athens' laws through the court system and its jurors. Socrates' accusations of being blasphemous are also seen as…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Execution In The Story Of Crito
    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Socrates Execution In The Story Of Crito

    Socrates decided to face his execution throughout a long and thoughtful process to determine whether it would end up being just or unjust for him to escape. Crito tried all that he could to persuade…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Crito Analysis
    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Martin Luther King Crito Analysis

    In "Crito," Plato uses Socrates as a tool to argue the point. Socrates is in jail for "preaching false gods" and "corrupting the youth" by causing them to doubt or disregard the wisdom of their…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Crito Argument
    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Crito Argument

    The dialogue of The Crito evaluates one of the last days of Socrates life. Upon which, Socrates has been awaiting his execution for a month due to a religious mission to the island of Delios, sacred to Apollo during which no executions can take place, insinuating that Socrates has had much time to ponder his sentence and escape, as well as the result of further action. Crito eagerly attempts persuading Socrates to escape by presenting many gripping arguments. Socrates responds to these arguments by asking/interrogating Crito with questions surrounding pressing life principles that both men agree on and by doing so provides an argument against Crito’s encouragements of escape.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Disobeyed The Unjust Analysis
    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates Disobeyed The Unjust Analysis

    • 1. In the Apology, Socrates recounts how he disobeyed the unjust order of the Thirty Tyrants to arrest a fellow citizen; he also claims that he will never stop philosophizing, regardless of what the legally constituted political authority commands. Yet, in the Crito, Socrates provides numerous arguments for obeying the decision of the legally constituted political authority, even though the decision (to put Socrates to death) was unjust. Critically assess whether Socrates’s view about political obligation in the two texts is consistent.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparison Between Crito and Apology
    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Comparison Between Crito and Apology

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Theory Of Justice Analysis
    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato's Theory Of Justice Analysis

    Plato’s theory of justice is about equality and that one deserves punishment if they do commit an unjust action. During the Crito, Socrates tries to correct a lot of points that Crito is trying to argue with him about, what it means to be justice. To be justice, means a human being that does good based on the laws that are emplaced according to the state. Good people according to Socrates are only worth considering. People that do good are considered moral people, and have opinions that should be regarded because their inputs are considered to be ethically correct. Being a human of ethical virtues means that they must not do wrong. Anything that is immoral, is considered immoral. We as humans may not intervene in activities that deem to be…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Crito
    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato's Crito

    Socrates, addressing Crito’s argument to help Socrates escape from jail, tells Crito that his enthusiasm is appreciated however it is too emotional for figuring out what is right and wrong. He explains that decisions must be made rationally, and that just because circumstances may change, the values that he has always…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antigone vs. Socrates
    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antigone vs. Socrates

    In the Crito, Socrates is approached by his life-long friend Crito while in prison awaiting execution. Crito used many different ways to attempt to persuade Socrates to escape. The best argument Crito uses is that he says Socrates would be…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Arguments In Crito's Apology
    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Socrates Arguments In Crito's Apology

    After the false accusations in the Apology, Socrates is imprisoned for being wrongly tried and condemned to death, later on he is greeted by Crito his friend who visits in the cell with him. Crito tries to convince him through compelling, but at times selfish arguments. Socrates responds against these arguments with selfless reasons to explain the bigger issue of his own principles. Firstly, Crito argues minor and major points of logic on why it is right to escape, but Socrates does not escape based on his obedience to divine command. Secondly, Socrates reasons that he does himself justice by obeying the law at hand and dying will do him more good than harm because he has lived his whole life according to what is just and good and betraying his sensible reasons would only convict him of not doing what he stood for. In the end, Socrates will not go against the laws that govern the state not for the sake of obeying itself, but he knows…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Try to Persuade Socrates Friends to Save Him Against His Will
    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Try to Persuade Socrates Friends to Save Him Against His Will

    Furthermore, Crito shows some of his arguments why Socrates should escape. First, If he dies he will leaves his 3 children and family. Second, If Socrates dies, Crito will lose close friend. Third, If Crito will not save him, this will be a big shame for his reputation . On the one hand, among his friends, because it will seems that Crito did not his best to save him. On the other hand among the people in Athens just because they expect it to happen and the opinion of majority still matter. Therefore, If Crito will not save Socrates, the people will think that he does not want to do it and does not want to spend money for him.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    A Critique of the Crito and an Argument for Philosophical Anarchism
    • 3290 Words
    • 14 Pages

    A Critique of the Crito and an Argument for Philosophical Anarchism

    In this essay I will present a summary and critique of Plato’s dialogue Crito, focusing especially on Socrates’ arguments in favor of his obligatory obedience to the Athenian state’s death sentence. In response I will argue the position that no one naturally holds any obligation to obey the arbitrary commands of another (or any body of others such as a state), and further that no one can come to hold such obligations even by contract; although people may still be obligated to obey commands issued to them, when what is commanded is obligatory independent of it being commanded by anyone. Thus I will argue that that if, as both Socrates and Crito presume, the command that Socrates be executed is contrary to true justice (that is, contrary to any natural moral obligations, independent of its legality), then Socrates has no obligation to obey it; and in fact those tasked to carry out the order are morally obligated to disobey it, and by their obedience become conspirators to a moral crime. The dialogue begins with Socrates in prison, awakening to Crito’s presence in his cell, Crito having bribed the guards to gain entry. After brief pleasantries and some talk of when the day of Socrates’ execution will fall, Crito admits to Socrates that his purpose there is to free him from prison and take him abroad to Thessaly, which he assures him can be successfully done thanks to the aid of a number of foreign benefactors. But Socrates is hesitant to leave, believing himself obliged to remain and allow his punishment to be completed, even though his sentence, they both concede, is unjust. Still, Socrates is eager to be convinced otherwise, if Crito can do so by means of reason, and so Crito plies Socrates with many arguments in favor of his escape, arguing not only that it is possible and desirable to escape, and that Socrates could live well outside of Athens, but that it is the just…

    • 3290 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    socrates paper
    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages

    socrates paper

    There are many questions that could be asked about the topic of morality. Questions like, what are the central moral principles, who is the ideal person, how do you determine right versus wrong. In Socrates’ eyes, I believe that the question of morality comes down to one main question, is it just or unjust? When Socrates was imprisoned facing his death, one of his close friends, Crito, came to him and presented him with an opportunity to escape and he replies to the proposal by saying, “Then in light of this admission we must consider whether or not it is just for me to try and get away without being released by the Athenians. If it turns out to be just, we must make an attempt; if not, we must drop it.” (Crito 48c). Crito then continues to give him reasons why they must escape including how Socrates is endangering the reputation of his friends, how he was put into jail unjustly, and how he is acting unjustly by joining the efforts of his enemies against him. Socrates replies by saying “whatever the popular view is, and whether the consequence is pleasanter than this or even tougher, the fact remains that to commit injustice is in every case bad and dishonorable for the person who does it.” “In no circumstances must one do wrong.” “One must never return injustice when one is wronged, which most people regard as the natural course.” (Crito 49b). I believe this passage…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More