Preview

Socrates Vs Kant

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
114 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates Vs Kant
- Article 1 states that “No treaty of peace shall be held valid in which there is a tacitly reserved matter for a future war” because that would essentially be a contract made in bad faith where it is supposedto be signed in good faith, Bona Fides, and would furthermore violate the concept of a “peace treaty” supposed to remove the causes of future wars.
- Article 2 states that “No independent states, large or small, shall come under the dominion of another state” because that undermines the moral basis of the nation. Kant reasoned that a nation is by definition “a society of men whom no one else has any right to command”.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    What is the main idea of this article? This article explains the relationship of the states to one another and to the national government.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Socrates: Should a man professionally engaged in physical training pay attention to the praise and blame and opinion of any man or to those of one man only namely a doctor or trainer”. The problem with this is that the opinion of the majority bears a different type of value than the opinion of a single specialized instructor. In his example it seems accurate to follow the advice of a doctor because the majority is generally uneducated on training. However, you can not trust the advice of just one person. This doctor may have a special agenda. He could be paid by another athlete to make the man training lose. Of course Socrate’s paradigm is just an illustration and is not meant to be examined too deeply but when we apply it to real life…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two of the greatest and earliest thinkers of our time are Plato, and his most famous pupil, Aristotle. Soon after Plato’s teachings, Aristotle criticized his claims and independently became a thinker on his own. These philosophers viewed metaphysics differently, and they approached the idea of reality in two opposing ways. Plato’s Theory of Forms was a concept that was defined in a different way by Aristotle. They both believed in “forms” but approached this idea differently.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glaucon vs. Socrates

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Book Two of The Republic, Glaucon tests Socrates view of justice. Socrates believes that “injustice is never more profitable than justice” (31). With this, he describes how the good life is determined by whether you are just or unjust. Socrates explains how justice is observed through the genuine acts of human character; justice is evaluated by how morally right one is. Glaucon however challenges this idea, as he wishes to be shown why being just is desirable. He trusts that we as humans naturally act just because the scare of punishment. Glaucon reasons that if the fear of getting penalized was removed, if punishment was not at all possible, then we would do anything we wanted whenever we wanted to without hesitation.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant is recognized as the greatest philosopher since Plato and Aristotle (Wolff). He is most widely known for his work in the fields of metaphysics and epistemology (McCormick). Kant published many works regarding his epistemological views, but his most famous work is The Critique of Pure Reason (McCormick). He noted that Descartes had “simply accepted consciousness as an…inexplicable fact” (Wolff). Kant utilized this observation to refute Descartes’ famous quote, “I think, therefore I am,” with a slightly revised premise— “I am conscious” (Wolff).…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates Vs King

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page

    King references philosophical literature and political theory to explain his push for Civil Rights within the south. During the speech Dr. King references Socrates, utilizing Plato’s work in which Socrates is found challenging the thoughts of individuals through a series of questions and answers. The Socratic Method would be used so that citizens can challenge their own preconceived thoughts in a non-threating way. Non-violence protests were a tool that King used forcing individuals in the South to think about where they stood on the issue of Civil Rights. King follows this by referencing political history explaining that no political ruler ever gave up power willingly. This can be deduced from the Monarchs of Europe to the Military leaders…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates vs Thrasymachus

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Any argument relies upon some fundamental agreement about the issue being discussed. However great the divide in opinion may be, there must exist at least some similarity in the participants’ manner of viewing the issue if a solution is ever to be reached. Book One of Plato’s Republic features a disagreement between Socrates and Thrasymachus about the nature of justice. The disaccord between their views of the subject is extremely pronounced, but there are certain underlying agreements which guide the course of the debate. One way to evaluate the validity of the arguments involved is to examine whether the assumptions at the root of the argument are in accord with this common ground. By my reading of the dialogue, Socrates’ reply to the first part of Thrasymachus’ definition of justice rests safely upon this common ground, whereas his answer to Thrasymachus’ second definition moves away from this mutually acceptable base, and is injured as a result. In exploring this topic, I intend to examine briefly Thrasymachus’ two-part definition of justice. For each of these parts I will evaluate one Socratic response and discuss it from the perspective of the “craftsman analogy” – an analogy which is initially used by common consent, but which Socrates adapts until its original usage almost disappears.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antigone vs. Socrates

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the plays Antigone and the Crito the two lead characters, Antigone and Socrates, showed completely different ideas regarding their responsibilities to the State. Antigone believes in divine law and does what she thinks that the Gods would want her to do. Socrates, on the other hand, believes that he owes it to the State to follow their laws whether he thinks they are right or not.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs Aristotle

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During the 17th and 18th century two philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, arose carving for themselves a trench in the philosophical world. We can see the biggest distinction between the two in their theories of how we know things exist. The traditions of Plato and Aristotle have been dubbed rationalism and empiricism respectively. Under these traditions many well known philosophers have formed their own theories of God, existence and the material world. Through these individual theories I will show how each fits into the category of either Rationalist or Imperialist. The Plutonian philosophers to be discussed will include Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. And the Aristotelian philosophers will include Locke, Berkeley and Hume.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Socrates

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thrasymachus argues for the view that justice is the advantage of the powerful – that it is “simply the interest of the stronger” (Plato’s The Republic, translated by Richard W. Sterling and William C. Scott, page 35). Laws, he says, are specifically “designed to serve the interests of the ruling class” (36). Of course, the ruling class is the strongest class, so it follows that the laws serve the advantage of the strong. The citizens under the ruling class serve “interests [of their strong unjust ruler] and his happiness at the expense of their own” (41). Thrasymachus concludes that “the dynamics of justice, then, consistently operate to advantage the ruler but never the subjects” (41).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato vs. Socrates

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato and Aristotle, two very well known philosophers, by definition are knowledge lovers, who held different ways of thinking on that of creation, politics, and love, consequently the teacher of Aristotle, who was Plato, holds different views on all of those matters.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates states that the human soul is immortal and it is reborn again, but it’s never destroyed. Socrates also points out that the soul has learned everything that is to know. Therefore, when we “learn” about something, it is merely just a “recollecting” what our soul’s have learned in the past. This idea is essentially the basis of the argument between Socrates and Meno. Socrates tries to prove this to Meno by calling over one of Meno’s servant and confirms that the boy has no knowledge of mathematics. At first, the boy seemed to have no knowledge about Socrates problem. But, through step-by-step questions, the boy was able to provide a correct answer to Socrates problem. Therefore, Socrates states that, since he had no knowledge of geometry in his life, he must have already known it and he was able to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jesus vs Socrates

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Socrates, known as the famous Greek philosopher and one of the wisest people around, was looked at as being a very strong willed and “stand-by-his-opinion” kind of man. Jesus, on the other hand, was a man who went through his life not by blatantly expressing and sharing his wisdom, but by making his “students” think things through for themselves in order to gain understanding and wisdom in certain topics. Based on what is known about Jesus and Socrates, two major moral figures in the world, it is hard to comprehend the major similarities that they obtain with one another because of their radical differences on how they lived their lives focusing on the way in which they were raised, what exactly they were standing up for and the way in which their lives ended because of it.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When presented with situations whose outcomes reflect that of a Catch-22, exactly how does one know which repercussion is more favorable, or the least detrimental? In the circumstance of the trolley, mothers, and children, both decisions can be determined “the morally correct decision” depending on the philosophies behind them. In this paper, I will compare Mill’s, Kant’s and Antigone’s perspectives in order to determine their position in the trolley situation.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Article 1 stated that each party should resolve the international argument in a peaceful manner so that the international peace was not endangered and to abstain from the threat of the use of force in any way which is contradicted to the purpose of United Nations.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays