The issue that is particularly interesting to me is the “sweetened beverage tax.” This proposal was made to help the children’s health and wellbeing. The proposed course of action and policy agenda Imposes a tax on every distributor for the privilege of distributing in this state bottled sweetened beverages, at a specified rate, and for the privilege of distributing concentrate in the state, either as concentrate or as sweetened beverages derived from that concentrate, at a specified rate of sweetened beverage to be produced from concentrate. Provides exemptions. Requires tax moneys to be deposited in the Children 's Health Promotion Fund for childhood obesity prevention activities and programs. Use of funds includes: improving access to and consumption of healthy, safe, and affordable foods and beverages, encouraging physical activity, regulating weight management intervention activities in the medical setting, improving or building school recreational facilities used for recess and physical education, implementing Safe Routes to Schools programs, improving the quality and nutrition of school breakfasts, lunches, and snacks, and ensuring free, clean drinking water access throughout the school day.…
In “Soda’s a Problem but…” Karin Klein distinguishes the government’s issue, “But the mayor’s initiative goes further than something like a soda tax... Bloomberg is playing nanny in the worst sort of way…”(Karin Klein, 289). Simply put, the author explains how the government is overseeing people’s lives and the choices they can make. The government is making decisions by themselves, without the people’s consent! Basically, the limitations on sugary drinks is unacceptable and should be…
In my opinion I think there should be tax for soda, and sweet drinks. First, it states in paragraph three that they are trying to encourage you to exercise more. Secondly, it also stated in paragraph three that they try to reduce suffering and save lives. Lastly, it stated in paragraph two that they try help stop obesity. This is my opinion what's your…
I’d say fat chance. Now, before we implement something as big as a tax on these unhealthy products, we must think of the people this tax affects the most. According to the text, “its impact would fall most directly on the poor, nonwhite people who tend to be the most avid consumers of soft drinks and the most sensitive to price”. One would have to ask themselves, “Would this…
“How far should the Government go to protect us from ourselves?” (Huffingtonpost.com). That is a question some New Yorkers have been asking themselves since September 13th, 2012, when the New York City board of public health officially put into effect a ban of selling sugary, soft drinks over 16 ounces (about half a liter). This soda ban has divided the city separating residents into two distinct views. Will this new ban benefit New York City and create yet another stepping stone against the obesity epidemic, or is it an unnecessary abuse of power by the government, that is unfair to big corporations and businesses?…
It’s not the government’s job to make decisions about what we drink and where we drink it. That’s why I think it’s a bad idea to ban soda machines from schools.…
Furthermore you dont think that people getting literally addicted to sugar like its morphine or heroin is a bad thing then you obviously have biast oppinion on the subject. The approach that is being taken may have a few flaws but in a general sence is a great way to do it. Its as easy as sunday morning, you're served less so you drink less. It makes complete sence why someone who is served a 24oun portion of a drink may drink the whole thing because its sitting right there in front of them. But as to someone who is served (what should be) a normal sized portion of 16oun will be completely satisfied and would not have taken in the extra calories and sugary content in the 24 or more oun. Of course this plan isnt completely perfect because places like 7/11 or grocerie stores are exempt from the ban as well as milk based drinks that can contain the same amount if not more calories and sugar then the sodas.…
Soda ban maybe can help to stop the growing of obesity rate, and even reduce it. Take China as example, in which the largest size of sugary drink is 22 ounces (in US it is 44 ounces) the overall obesity rate is below 5 percent(WHO). Furthermore, by improving the public health, the government can save more resource from health care and invent them to solve other problems. So I think the soda ban is an effective and useful decision.…
What will happen if they make that a law in all the 50 states, which will be terrible. That will mean that they are trying to overpower people's opinion. How does the government know that this banning on sodas and candy machine is going to work? Are they going to weigh every person in New York every week or something? No, they can't do that is impossible, insane, and irrational. I disagree with the government.…
-Putting the soda ban in effect can reduce obesity rates, the amount of sugar being consumed by drinking soda is not good for your health.…
Taxing the population in prospect of raising money to go towards our government has many different sides, but just how effective would it be to make an extra profit from soda, and where exactly the money would be used most effectively. It Casebook it is stated “A recent study by Cornell University, for example, indicated that the annual cost of treating obesity is now $168 billion. That amounts to 16.5 percent of the country’s total medical care expenses” (Should Government Tax Sugary Drinks?). Despite even the most creative ideas such as Jan Brewer’s proposition to charge all overweight Medicaid patients and additional annual fee of fifty dollars, the taxes and fees could not begin to pay for people to administrate them, never the less cause any significant impact on our financial…
Obesity is a major issue in the United States of America. What defines a person obese is the minimum of thirty percent over their average body weight. It is also the leading causes of poor medical conditions such as, Type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, and heart disease. Poor food choices (high in sugar, saturated and trans fats), lack of exercise (sedentary lifestyles), and lack of sleep are several factors that lead to weight gain. There was an article in the New York Post three weeks ago that relates to one of the factors of weight gain. This article was Mayor Mike Bloomberg’s proposal to ban the sale of sugary sodas above sixteen ounces. This proposal would only affect restaurants, theaters, and sports venues. Grocery stores or vending machines will not be affected with the soda ban in any way. Yet, in my opinion, sodas are not the only problem that increases obesity. As an example of a similar proposal, studies have shown that the ban of sodas in schools did not decrease weight gain. Sometimes we have to look deeper into the source of where the problem began such as childhood diets. A solution is to add more healthy nutritional courses available to colleges and universities, since students are introduced into a work related environment, and can manage the skills of time related issues when dieting. In a busy city like New York, this skill can come in handy, and not become vulnerable to the independent high in saturated fat restaurants. Mayor Bloomberg stated, “It is the single biggest step any government has taken to attack obesity.”(Goldenberg). Obviously the school already conducted such a proposal and Bloomberg did not do any research on the issue. In recent articles, the proposal did pass with a eight to zero vote, with one abstention. (Goldenberg). The single abstention did mention, “This is not comprehensive…It is not enough…It’s only one…
People may not be willing to accept this, thinking that obesity it not a problem. They may believe that it 's not our responsibility, that it is none of our business. I believe that there is some validity to these concerns. No, it is not necessarily our business. And if we were to tax sugary drinks, this could affect those on a lower socio-economic level, because these drinks are usually the most affordable for them. As Daniel Engber writes in "Let Them Drink Water!", "We 've known for a long time that any sin tax is likely to be a burden on the poor, since they 're most prone to unhealthy behavior"(643). So yes, there are draw backs from this proposed tax, but in the long run I truly believe that it will pay off for our health. I also believe that if we make the health concerns of others our business, we can help them be healthier individuals. This would go on to make our country as a whole happier, healthier, and stronger.…
Added taxes like cigarettes and soda are not helping improve our schools as promised. Our schools still look the same with no support, extra-curricular activities. The tax didn’t change anything for our schools. Our books still old and falling apart. People from Pepsi quit their job because they thought they weren’t getting paid enough. The soda tax should affect their paycheck. This is really an outrage and it is affecting not only the jobs at Pepsi Co. also it is effecting the stores who are not selling as much sodas and juices due to the tax. This affects the peoples’ families as well because the operations of those stores help to feed their families. This soda tax really isn’t helping the schools as stated when the tax was proposed. Additionally,…
For years health experts have been warning Americans to lose weight and adopt a healthier lifestyle. Over time obesity rates have tripled. It is obvious we are losing the battle against obesity. Combating obesity and its numerous illnesses will not require more drugs to lower cholesterol, diet books, or workout videos. It will require rethinking our environment. Other measures need to be taken to tackle this national epidemic. Addressing this issue is no easy task. Several experts have suggested implementing a junk food tax. This would provide funding to regulate junk food, its advertising, and many other areas improving our health. This idea has sparked a wide controversy in regard to the obesity issue, the benefits of such a tax plan, and our cherished individual freedom that health is our own responsibility.…