Thesis: In all aspects of the areas of social and solitary happiness the goal is to sort out happiness. Being self sufficient should never to be confused with a friendless atmosphere, and social will require an audience for accomplishing something good.
There are two exclusions to achieving happiness through solitary commitment and social dedication. The boundaries of both should be kept in moderation mode. Happiness is obtained, through deep thought, and hard work sorting out what one wants out of life. Some solitary, social happiness can be risky to the mental state of being if not used with self control and balance.
Introduction: The authentic analogy of the two types of happiness, social, solitary from different aspects. Each of these is selected depending on the comfort zone, emotion, and the rapture of pleasures one receive while searching for happiness. Happiness is a mental state of well-being which is focused on people, things, and behaviors that will inspire one in a positive way. Living ones entire life searching for this magical sensation only to realize there is never satisfaction from finding it. The premise of both theories is one works and the other works according to which you chose to obtain it from.
Outline:
A. The first form of happiness is solitary and the effects on an individual experiencing solitary confinement with their own commitment to happiness.
1. The danger in solitary happiness
2. Being in control of your time, and making your happiness the center point.
3. Having solitude in the comfort ability of one’s own company.
B. Finding happiness with people, and sharing life experiences in a social environment.
1. The thermostat of happiness regulated in society.
2. Relationships between two people.
3. Choosing what kind of happiness that will satisfy your yearning.
Conclusion:
The social and the solitary is both evenly needed to reach the ultimate altitude of successfully