Preview

Sonnet 130 Ap Language Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
506 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sonnet 130 Ap Language Essay
The art of seduction has been accomplished in numerous ways throughout history and has always remained dependent on the assumed appeal of the person being seduced. In Shakespeare's “Sonnet 130”, the genre of Carpe Diem was exemplified with a largely satirical approach. In doing so, the speaker tried to appeal to his mistress by appealing to ethos with Aristotle's first version of ethos, appeal of your own good character, more specifically, will-power or arete, as well as Aristotle's second version of ethos, appealing to the character of one's audience. Shakespeare had the speaker attempt to seduce his homely mistress by appealing to Aristotle's first version of ethos, more specifically, the will-power or arete. In order to appeal to will-power, one is relentless in adhering to his or her principles. The speaker was relentlessly honest while trying to seduce his mistress in effort to make his true virtue evident …show more content…
Tailoring an argument to appeal to an audience is how the second version of ethos was appealed to. The seducer profiled his audience, the mistress, specifically through social status. The seducer took advantage of the mistress's social status of the homely woman through criticism in effort to capitalize on her anxiety of ending up alone. This may have made the seducer more appealing to the scared woman because she had a large desire to avoid her anxiety. Both tone and diction play an integral part to the second version of ethos. The tone that was used was quite satirical in order to take away from the brutal words meant for the mistress. Meanwhile, the speaker used nature like diction to assist in appealing to the mistress. In using words like “sun”, “snow”, “roses”, and “sound”, the mistress may align with the fact that nature decided her appearance and decided how to judge her appearance as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Specifically, how does knowing more background information and critical discussion impact our understanding of the ideas in the poem and our appreciation of the artistry of Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116?…

    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle came up with a persuasive pattern we see in media all over called, rhetorical appeals. Ethos, logos, and pathos are seen in various types of media, ads, magazines, and many more. In “The Qualities of a Prince” an excerpt by Niccolò Machiavelli, he informs us about how a prince is able to hold his title and position and how to maintain the power that he has over the people. He uses past experiences for examples on how to maintain power. In Capitalism: A Love Story by Michael Moore, he tries to incorporate the rhetorical appeals into his argument about power. In order to use these appeals he shows how the government has abused capitalism and gains the viewers trust by using persuasive patterns. Each…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The paralyzing powers of speech often engulfs the human mind and corrupts it to the will of the speaker. Omnipresent in society, rhetorical appeals, the appealing powers of speech, are made to project the speaker’s thoughts and ideas of a subject matter. From ordinary conversations to commercial advertisements to public addresses, appeals are present to influence an audience’s mindset. The appeal of Logos creates compelling evidence for the audience to develop conclusions in the speaker’s favor while the appeal of Pathos relies on morals, values, and emotions to create a response from the audience. Combined with the appeal of Ethos to establish credibility in the speaker, the appeals are potentially powerful enough to cause everlasting impacts on society and revise history itself. Throughout history, great orators such as Hitler, Martin Luther King, and other political leaders have used the power of speech to transform people’s thoughts and ideas. This practice has dated back to ancient times to Mark Antony at the funeral of his friend and mentor, Julius Caesar. In William Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony establishes himself to his audience, the plebeians, with Ethos then uses Pathos to pull on the audience’s heartstrings and sway the plebeians’ beliefs with Logos in an attempt to make the audience doubt Brutus’s justification of killing Caesar because he was ambitious.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethos, Pathos, and Logos are modes of persuasion often used to convince audiences. Ethos pertains to the speaker’s expertise, credibility, and honesty. Pathos relates to the speaker’s feelings and emotions, while logos is an appeal to reason and logic. In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Antony uses these elements to nullify the effect of Brutus’ convincing explanation of Caesar’s murder and to change the minds of the plebeians. Antony’s speech had an immense impact on the minds and opinions of the plebeians for he was able to turn the crowd against Brutus.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aeschylus’s The Oresteia explores the nuances of persuasive rhetoric. One of the most verbally powerful characters of the play, Clytaemestra, maintains her command solely through her effective use of persuasion. At the point in Greek history when The Oresteia takes place, war is in an interlude and the remaining warriors of the Trojan War carry out with their nostoi, or homecomings. Since the power of physical strength is no longer a driving force in Greek culture, as war no longer dominates society, this art of the womanly deception of speech evolves into the most powerful means of control in Greek society. The fervor of speech retains a feminine connotation because women were deemed duplicitous and conniving on a much broader level than men ever were. Masculine speech encompassed more political or public matters. Aeschylus develops this notion through Clytaemestra’s character by offering her a voice of intelligent deception, so illusory to the point of being masculine. In each play of The Oresteia, Clytaemestra employs specific rhetorical devices tailored to the audience she intends to cajole in her favor. She effectively alters the mode of her persuasion depending on the gender of her audience and her audience’s personal relationship witha her. Although Clytaemestra eventually meets her downfall due to a lapse in poise, her rhetoric introduces to the audience the idea that the confident and clever manipulation of words can play a pivotal role in influencing others’ decisions.…

    • 2069 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manipulation, in essence, is a timeless recurring theme not only in literature, but in our everyday life. William Shakespeare’s drama, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is saturated with rhetorical strategies. Brutus, Cassius, and Antony use their words throughout different parts of the play to sway other people’s opinions. Cassius’s persuasion is so powerful it leads to the death of Julius Caesar. Brutus is left with the repercussions of the assassination and has to speak to the Romans. Brutus and Antony go back-to-back speaking to the Romans using rhetorical strategies to explain their diverse views on the event. These three characters’ use of ethos, pathos, and logos was so compelling it persuaded the other people’s views, caused Caesar’s death,…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In ‘Much Ado’ Hero’s silence defines her submissive character. SP Cerasano’s comment that women were expected to be ‘chaste, silent and obedient… property of her father, husband or guardian’, typifies Hero as the model of Elizabethan womanhood. The unspoken implication of ‘you know your answer’ from Leonato in 2/1 regarding gossip about Don Pedro expresses male dominance.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are two main questions that Neo-Aristotelian criticism is revolved around – (1) Did the speech evoke the intended response from the immediate audience? And (2) Did the rhetor use the available means of persuasion to achieve the desired response? There are three steps that are used to answer these questions – (1) Examine the context surrounding the rhetorical artifact, (2) Analyze the piece of rhetoric and (3) Determine the impact of the rhetoric on the audience and how this relates to the rhetor’s choices of persuasion.…

    • 2591 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To a great extent, modern audiences would find the representation of objectification of women very much sinister, particularly in Hero’s case. Shakespeare’s depiction of the interactions between Claudio: her potential Husband and Leonato- her own Father, prior to Hero’s public shaming from Claudio convey this. ‘Give me this maid, your daughter?’ Here, the two men are discussing the giving of Hero, as if she were an object to be traded, but as a formality for the marriage, suggesting the idea of the relations between the two genders as very much sinister. To modern audiences more so than a contemporary audience who may have been more sympathetic to patriarchal values, the ominous feel of this is enriched by Shakespeare’s use of dramatic irony with ‘this maid’ as the audience knows that Claudio believes her not to be a maid, yet Leonato and Hero are unaware at this point what Claudio has been led to believe. Shakespeare’s use of the imperative, “There, Leonato, take her back again” conveys that he is angry with Leonato, as if Leonato has been trying cheat him by giving him a used product when he wanted Hero new and clean. Claudio afterwards refers to Hero as a piece of rotten fruit, viciously implying she is morally raucous. ‘He’ implies that what was once sweet and pure is now spoiled, just an inanimate object to be thrown away. Shakespeare uses a biblical reference to convey the idea of the objectification of Hero- Similar to when Eve was tempted in Eden by the fruit that turned out to be bad; Claudio was also first attracted and then repulsed by the "impure" Hero. Shakespeare’s representation of the men’s view of Hero in this extract is far more sinister than comedic because of this objectification of women. Despite the baneful discussion, Elizabethan audiences may not have found the idea of objectifying women comedic or sinister, as it was just the norm, however a modern audience would find it very much sinister, as women and men of this century are of equal…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trust In Julius Caesar

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fundamentals of marriage have been seen throughout history with the golden “rule” always being trust, in some cases trust must be earned by persuasion. In a story that completely negates the meaning of trust such as Julius Caesar, it is still has a constant presence. The idea of trust is shown in a momentous scene with the character Portia attempting to persuade Brutus that he can entrust her, this point in the book can relate to a logos or pathos emotion. In Act II of Julius Caesar, Portia uses emotional and logical appeal to convince Brutus that she is not only worthy, but as his wife, obligated to be informed of what is troubling him.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare and Browning both present the theme of desire through their central characters. Lady Macbeth (and Macbeth) is motivated by the desire for ambition and authority in ‘Macbeth’ whilst in the Browning monologues; the monologists are driven by the desire of power and control in ‘Porphyria’s Lover’ and revenge in ‘The laboratory’. All of which seem to have fatal conclusions as a result of each of their desires. As the texts were produced over 400years ago, audiences may have found the works of Shakespeare and Browning highly thought-provoking and entertaining whilst contemporary audiences finding the different aspects of desire relatable to modern situations. Lady Macbeth’s need for authority in her famous soliloquy ‘unsex me here’ reflects on the feelings of many women at that time longing for power. Likewise, audiences of the ‘the Laboratory’ are able to empathise with the protagonist’s desire for revenge upon their adulterous lover. In ‘Porphyria’s Lover’, Browning reveals an obsessive and controlling persona who can only satisfy his absolute love for his lover by strangling her, presenting his desire for control over others.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Othello Act 3

    • 12985 Words
    • 52 Pages

    Othello, one of Shakespeare’s four ‘great tragedies’, is a text with many applicable themes: oppression of race, subjection of the female to male domination, and the disastrous consequences of jealousy. What is unique about the characters’ ‘need…

    • 12985 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasion in Macbeth

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare, in his time period, was renowned for his marvelous play writing and pushing the English language to its limits. “Macbeth”, by William Shakespeare, shows the use of the three forms of rhetoric (logos, pathos, ethos) throughout the play. Shakespeare uses all three forms of rhetoric to have characters persuade others, and, themselves.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Power of Rhetoric

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Caesar was brutally murdered, and now Brutus and Antony present their funeral speeches with the purpose to make people believe in their own views on this murder. The central theme of Act 3, Scene 2 of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is the power of rhetoric. From this scene we are able to see the power that words can have—how they can awake emotions, manipulate opinions, and motivate actions. Through the essay I will be comparing Antony and Brutus speeches and their effect on the society using Aristotle’s postulated three argumentative appeals: logical, emotional and ethical. Powerful and superior rhetoric has a balance of all of three aspects. In contrast to Brutus, Antony presents a superb and more rhetorically powerful funeral oration because he is able to apply logical, emotional and ethical appeals in the perfectly balanced way. In comparison to Antony, Brutus bases his speech not on logical facts but on his reputation, manipulating with the fact that he is an honorable man. In terms of emotions, Brutus uses only pity when Antony employs the use of nostalgia and pity therefore generates a deeper emotional connection with the audience. Finally, Antony presents delightful ethical appeal whereas Brutus uses it very poorly.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The art of manipulation and persuasion is truly effective when one is incompetent to the fact that they alone are not thinking for themselves. Since the beginning of time, humankind has wanted to have control. In some instances they will strive for power in ways that make them oblivious to right and wrong. Occasionally, they will go against what they are told to do and instead to what they want to do. In the play Julius Caesar the power of persuasion and manipulation of language is clear when two men, Brutus and Mark Antony, spiel to the people of their country, each attempting to gain the support of the populace over the death of Caesar. Even though Brutus establishes ethos throughout his speech, Mark Antony’s uses it to his advantage…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays