Preview

South Africa Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2336 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
South Africa Truth and Reconciliation Commission
After many years of violence, discrimination, and white supremacy, South Africa was finally determined to change its political system from an apartheid government into a democracy. In 1948, with the National Party in power, the apartheid legislation was established. It was not an easy road for those who, since the beginning, wanted to end this political separation. Racial groups were forbidden, in any case, to have any public or private contact with white people. Therefore, blacks and ethnic people were banned to step in an “all white” territory. This program caused political violence between white people and the majority population in South Africa; organized riots took place to seek justice and government reform (the ANC was one group that fought for equal rights). Finally in 1994, after many years of violence, the African National Congress won elections and established a democratic government where whites and blacks now were going to be treated equally.
A truth commission is a form of justice, a justice that can either be accepted or disapproved by the victims. The main focus of a truth commission is to investigate previous atrocities that took place in the country and to offer a political reform that will set an ongoing process of change. On December 1995, The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was established by parliament and was closed on 2000. The TRC investigated killings by police, disappearances, torture, abuses, and violence. The TRC had three committees: The Human Rights Violations Committee, The Reparation and Rehabilitation Committee, and The Amnesty Committee. The Human Rights Violations Committee investigated the crimes committed during the apartheid era. The Reparation and Rehabilitation Committee gave assistance to victims and promoted forgiveness. The Amnesty Committee gave the perpetrators the opportunity to confess their participation in the abuses that went on from 1960 to 1994. Those who wanted a pardon had to fully say the truth



Cited: Page Ball, Patrick & Chapman Audrey. “The Truth of Truth Commissions: Comparative Lessons from Haiti, South Africa, and Guatemala”. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001. Hayner, Priscilla. Unspeakable Truths. Routledge, 2002. Gobodo-Madikizela, Pumla. A Human Being Died That Night. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2003.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    APWH DBQ Apart

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During 1948 and 1994 Apartheid was a system of racial segregation enforced by the government of South Africa. The rights of the majority non-whites were restricted while the minority white population was maintained. These documents show economic, political, and social relations.…

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    attorney-client privelge

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Truth-seeking- According to the International Center of Transitional Justice truth seeking is Truth commissions are not judicial inquiries. Th ey do not establish individual criminal responsibility for specifi c crimes, determine punishment, or use the standards of due process applicable in a court of law. If they gather evidence useful for a criminal investigation, their inquiries may precede or com- plement the work of a court of law.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Segregation also ran rampant during this time period, thus paving the way for laws to be made that instituted apartheid. These laws were specifically made for discrimination of public facilities, such as: separate drinking fountains, bathrooms, hotels, and restaurants. The courts believed that isolated, but equal facilities were constitutional; however, people now know that they were everything but equal. Many people wonder why there was even segregation in the first place, for it says in the Declaration of Independence, “all men are created equal.” To the courts and whites, segregation was used as a way to enhance and underline racial boundaries; it was an effort that whites used to emphasize that African Americans were vastly different than them, no matter what they thought, they were different “creatures.”…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite laws in place to prevent racism arising again in South Africa many of the people still have long held internal prejudices that lead to discrimination (Harris, 2016). Apartheid allowed the white minority population of South Africa to be completely dominant over the black African population, including, but not limited to; the ability to uproot and move South Africans from their homes, complete segregation, making interracial marriage illegal, and not allowing different races to live together. These government sanctioned discriminatory practices were protested by South Africans, most notably Nelson Mandela, a leader in the anti-apartheid movement. Despite cover-up attempts by the “Club of 10”, eventually the South African government began to face consequences for their violations of human rights (Harris, 2016). South Africa was “…expelled from the United Nations in 1974, the Olympic Games in 1976, and in 1986, the U.S. Congress banned new investment by U.S. companies in South Africa” (Harris, 2016).…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the period of the 1950’s, black people were discriminated against and received unfair treatment because of white people’s opinion on the race. Black people at the time had to live in very bad conditions, health, housing and school wise. It was enforced very harshly that white and black people (or people of colour) to be separated. This washarsher in the south due to the fact they were more openly racist than the north of America. This is due to slavery as most farms were founded in the south. White people still wanted to hold onto there belief of power and higher status. In 1863 Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery. In 1890s there was a marked increase in laws…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World History Final

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    the rights of the majority 'non-white' inhabitants of South Africa were curtailed and minority rule by white people was maintained.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout our studies we have discussed the various human rights violations that have occurred historically. Though at times disheartening and discouraging to learn about crimes against humanity, we have also learnt that it is important to continue advocating for the oppressed and to not abandon all attempts at changing these human rights violations simply because it feels as though we will never make a difference. In Tim Wise’s article (1999) he expresses similar feelings of discouragement and impossibilism (Gervais, personal communication, December 9, 2015). Yet, the letter he received from Archbishop Desmond Tutu was most revealing, stating that we do not study and do these things “because they will ultimately prove successful.…

    • 6644 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An amnesty report is an inventory of crimes committed against humanity. Amnesty International has made reports in Ghana and several other countries where atrocities are committed. They then report back to the United Nations, who then decides if action is necessary. In the case of Margaret Atwood’s poem “Footnote to the Amnesty Report on Torture,” the amnesty report is delivered in a very different way.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While North Korea’s allies Russia and China hold veto power against the ICC, DPRK leaders could possibly face charges for their heinous crimes against humanity. Adam Taylor, a columnist for Washington Post, explains that the crimes that the DPRK committed against its people led the Commission of Inquiry to compare the crimes to those committed by Nazi Germany during the second world war. The lengthy report released by the COI identified six groups of victims who were affected by the DPRK’s mishandling of human rights laws, such as people who try to flee the country, practicers of non Korean religion, and regular prison inmates are some of the people who were treated poorly by the government (Taylor). While the international community continues to lash out at North Korea, the small country will not listen to outsider propaganda and will continue to harvest their own, which only persuades viewers that their country is right for what they are doing. Danielle Chubb, a professor at Deakin University, claims that the responsibility to protect its citizens holds the DPRK accountable to the international community on key human rights laws and its protection of citizens. The DPRK ministry put out a statement describing its withholding of sovereignty, but also says that they are willing to discuss human rights dialogue with respect to the DPRK’s ethics (Chubb 71). In other words, the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Partington, when writing about the Criminal cases Review Commission, declared that “One of the most serious challenges facing the criminal justice system is ensuring that miscarriages of justice do not occur”, (Partington, Introduction to the English Legal System, Oxford University Press, 2012/13 (7th ed.) at page 135.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Fiona Ross’s Truth and Reconciliation we get to examine the results of the new government’s attempts at making reconciliations with some of the wrongs that the people of South Africa had endured during apartheid by means of “truth commissions” vis-à-vis people’s testimonies to the level of personal victimization they had endured. However, not all people chose to portray their involvement (however they want to define it) in apartheid as pure victimization. If one chose to recognize their involvement in apartheid in a more assertive manner, where they were not passively suffering, they were denied the rights to reparations. I find it unjust that only those who played the part required of them for the judicial system were rewarded, but it is also something that makes good sense. How else would the state of Zwelethemba distinguish between those affected by apartheid and those who managed to escape personal detriment? The fact is that if you are seeking to rebuild your future, you must reconstruct your past, at least for a short period of time. And that notion is something that the South African Commission tries to validate through supporting personal testimonies. Ross says that the Commission believed that “speaking of suffering was in some measure cathartic and would give rise to interpersonal and national reconciliation” (pg239). Many women, however, did not want to testify about any sexual violence they may have endured. The case is there, as it is here, that sometimes women are stigmatized as to blame for the sexual abuse they have endured and because of social stigmas attached to sexual violence, the insistence for women to testify should be seen as intrusive and humiliating. “Some hurts do not heal and avoidance may be a coping mechanism through which individuals manage past hurts” (pg 241). The Commission probably thought that testimonies would be the most effective method of giving personal and monetary acknowledgment to these individuals, and it’s…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The TRC brought the country as a whole, sections of society and to individuals. Nothing short of a miracle can heal a country. The terms of reconciliation, forgiving and healing became acceptable terms to many who were affected by apartheid. South African history was also given a chance to be recorder and people were given an opportunity to clear their conscious and find peace in the truth. For the first time, it was possible to see beyond the pain that many had suffered. South Africa would have been much poorer as a country if the truth had not been told and over 22 000 victims told their stories of abuse during apartheid. The TRC granted amnesty to qualified perpetrators in a gesture of peace and reconciliation. The evidence given revealed the existence of the Third Force, the squads of the Vlakplass, the Bureau of State Security (BOSS) and the Civilian Cooperation Bureau (CCB) as well as the abuses these groups committed such as political assassinations, torture and ambushes. Evidence had showed that police killed activists and this provided closure for the families. Even reluctant whites were forced to face the truth by watching events of the TRC unfold on the SABC news. Some say that the TRC prevented a civil war and therefore laid a foundation for a better South Africa. The TRC was also confronted by a number of challenges as it was not accepted by all parties to the conflict. Many people felt that the perpetrators of violence…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although many South Africans were victims of human rights violations during the apartheid, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission gave those victims some measure of closure and justice, helping the nation to create a more just and peaceful environment. These Truth and Reconciliation Commissions was a court-like justice system that helped victims of the South African apartheid. These commissions were accomplished by the work of three different committees that helped each victim present their case. The public from around the world looked at the acts of justice carried out in South Africa as very successful. Clearly, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission completely changed the South African government, people, and wellbeing drastically.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. The Kenya Human Rights Commission in Lest we Forget : Faces of impunity in Kenya (2011)…

    • 7052 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The aims of establishment of National Human Right Commission (NHRC) are to promote and protect human rights. The core functions of the commission include complaint handling, human rights education and making recommendations on law reform. An effective commission must has important link between government and civil society, in so far as they help bridge the 'Protection gap' between the rights of individuals and the responsibilities of the state.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays