Preview

Special Education and the Principles of No Child Left Behind (Nclb)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
437 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Special Education and the Principles of No Child Left Behind (Nclb)
Special Education and the Principles of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
XXXXX
XXXXXX
AED 222
XXXXXXX

The five core principles of NCLB are strong accountability for results, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. Each of them might affect diverse learners in both positive and negative ways. The No Child Left behind Act requires strong accountability for results by requiring that schools meet an adequate yearly progress (AYP) or minimum standards. States must develop clearly defined goals and then assess individual students to see if schools are meeting these goals. (The NCLB allows school districts and states to exempt 1% of students from the usual assessments. This 1% represents about 9% of those with disabilities and includes those with the most severe disabilities.) This positively affects diverse learners because it allows the NCLB to monitor how effectively the school districts teachers and methods are working. The NCLB act also allows for expanded flexibility and local control. By understanding that local officials know the needs of neighboring schools better than federal administrators and allowing them to use 50% of federal funding without needing prior approval, the NCLB act positively affects diverse learners again. This is a positive thing because by not requiring prior approval, the funds can reach the places they are needed most very quickly. The NCLB act tries to positively affect diverse learners by using teaching methods based on scientific research and highly qualified teachers. Federal support is targeted only to programs that have a proven track record of success and has demonstrated effectiveness through scientific research. Highly qualified teachers must have a college degree, full state certification, and demonstrate competency in the area(s) they teach by passing subject specific, state administered tests. In another attempt to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    However, does this policy aid the students who are directly affected by the policy, or does it remove these students even further from the schooling community making it even harder for them to be accepted or supported within a multi-cultural community?…

    • 2705 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2002 President Bush and democratic Senator Edward M. Kennedy supported the reform bill Np child Left Behind Act. This act created higher standard and goals for schools in order to improve the education system across all the states. There are four main pillars, the first are results, the scores are broken down by demographics and then it is determined if the school is needed to add more programs in order to better the scores. If no improvement is made then the school will have to reorganize. The second is that the funds are more flexible when it comes to spending. The third pillar is government created programs like, “Reading First”. the last pillar is the ability for student’s parents to change their child’s school because the scores are not being met, without extra charge on the school or the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When reading the 2007 article by education expert Linda Darling- Hammond called “Evaluating ‘No Child Left Behind’”, Darling- Hammond goes into depth and criticizes just how much the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) accomplished in five years. The author begins by using a neutral and agreeable tone with how the law was supposed to be “a victory for American children”. She also genuinely acknowledges that the notoriously known NCLB Act initially brought high hopes for us Americans to have a sophisticated and reformed education system for our children. But almost just as fast as she agrees that the law was intended for good, she gets right to her point that she opposes the law by using much of logos and connects pathos and ethos along the lines.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 3 Comm2

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Schoof, R. (2013) Talks about the pros of the ‘No Child Left Behind Act’ from 2002. It was an act that would make sure every child had an equal chance to obtain the same type of education every other kid will receive and no discriminate because a child may not have enough to go to school to get such education and does not discriminate against the child’s background, race, or disability that keeps a child from getting an equal chance.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Up until today, the ESEA was reauthorized seven times, but every time the original goal remained constant. Helping students in need was always the main objective. One of the major changes over the years was a transition in how the funds were distributed. From giving funds to the school itself, they were assigned to the students. Who received aid was based on economic status and economic achievement. Some specific acts changed particular aspects of the law. In 1981, the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act decreased federal regulations and gave control over to state governments instead of the federal government. Because of this act, an objective changed to advancing student’s personal achievement. Another bill called the Improving America’s Schools Act lowered the threshold for qualifying for aid from 75% to 50% of the population in poverty (wikipedia.org, “Elementary and Secondary Education Act”). It gave longer times to use federal funding and gave more control to local organizations, allowing federal requirements to be bypassed. In 2002, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act took on a new name, No Child Left Behind. No Child Left Behind was a standards based system that increased accountability between teachers and students. Each state would create its own education…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Impact of NCLB

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act functions as a data driven decision-making educational tool. This governmental act also provides support to teachers and administrators so that they can achieve these goals. One of the main aspects of the legislation was to have effective teachers in every classroom. The implementation process to achieve this transformation goal must be well planned out due to the number of uncertified teachers in the classroom prior to the act being implemented ( Left…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Along with the waste of $25.7 billion dollars in 2014, according to the New America Foundation, and failing of the program, the act brought more harm to the overall proficiency of students across America. Ironically, even when the act provided schools with more qualified teachers, test scores were not improving the way that was intended despite the good looking scores at the schools. These scores were due to the fact that schools were making their curriculum as easy as possible in order to make it less difficult for the students to do well on their tests and get extra funding from the government. This unfair gesture harmed the students by not teaching them anything and just passing them along to the next grade even if it was obvious they would still be struggling.…

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq No Child Left Behind

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They would try to accomplish this by having annual testing in subjects such as math, and reading to see their progress over the course of the school year, and schools would face severe penalties for schools that did not meet the goal that they had set for themselves (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). By having a set of standards that the schools had to keep and having a penalty for schools that did not meet their goal, it sets a parameter that should put a focus on the quality of the education of the child, to make sure they are receiving a quality education. Going back to the penalty section of the policy, this was a good thing to have, when writing the policy. By having a penalty you out a consequence for the schools for not providing a good quality education to the students. If a school did not meet its target goal on their progress reports, students could have the option to change schools if they wished, leadership of the schools could change, or the schools could close down entirely (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). This is important to know because it showed how seriously people were taking about the…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enabaling Ignorance

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “No child left behind” act (NCLB) passed this year through congress which was originally passed in 2002, that shows how can be common sense and experience is replaced. The author, Diane Ravitch pointed out in her book that NCLB promotes the weakness in American public school, rather than improving their strengths. The idea of passing NCLB proven wrong, because it is wasting of federal dollars, it increases corruption, and it a-parts teachers from the school system.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many students need extra help or time on certain subjects, NCLB will expand access to tutoring to ensure that parents will be notified if and when the students began to need extra help in academic assessments. Before a child can learn, they must learn to read and comprehend what is being read. To often students are unaware of what they are…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child-Left Behind Act

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (often referred to as No Child Left Behind) was a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools. President George W. Bush described this law as the "cornerstone of my administration" (Department of Education). It allows low-income families, whose children traditionally have less academic opportunities, to move to private school or specialized charter schools via a school voucher. The act was expected to introduce high standards for education, the belief that all children, regardless of class, should have equal opportunities to learn, and accountability for failing school systems. However, the act…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 1081 Words
    • 31 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act focuses on standardized testing in all American schools. It is the Bush administration's sweeping educational reform, aimed at improving the performance of the nation's public schools by introducing accountability. Supporters of the act claim that it will increase the performance of all school children by raising the standards and allowing parents greater freedom in choosing the school they want their child to attend. The act also puts in place a system of punishment for schools if their student body does not perform to the standards set down by the National government (NCLB act). As well as increasing standards, this act also encourages teachers to use a curriculum that the government developed with "scientifically based research" (a phrase that appears 111 times in the act) (Hammond 4). While standardized curriculum and increased standards seem like they would improve children's learning, in reality it hurts them by pushing them too hard academically instead of focusing on social development, and denying them specialized attention based upon their individual abilities. The debate surrounding this has become a significant topic since the Act is currently under review and could be in the process of reauthorization. At the time of its inception, both political parties (Republicans and Democrats) supported the NCLB Act, however, both parties are now arguing over its validity. In 2005, there have been slight \adjustments to the regulations first set in 2005 by the Department of Education, but the revisions were not enough to gain full support from both parties. This act has failed to garner support from most Americans, and like most Americans, I also agree that this should not be reinstituted. No Child Left Behind was designed by the Bush administration to reduce the "learning gap" between different groups of students and to ensure better teacher equality. However, it sets fourth a method of measuring…

    • 1081 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having educational institutions rely on funding from property taxes and other local revenue place minority communities who have historically been forced into low income neighborhoods and continue to be discriminated against in the job market no matter their qualifications at a disadvantage compared to their white counterparts. Even white people who are a part of a low income, underserved neighborhood fair better in education because they do not have negative stereotypes automatically assigned to them that discourages teachers from helping the students realize their full potential. These disadvantages can dishearten students from pursing or completing higher education, leading to their underemployment because they do not meet the standards of the employer and inability to better their neighborhood and school systems for the next generation. This cycle can only be broken by encouraging unbiased testing, minority financial aid, and a new policy that will allocate funds equally between public elementary…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act is an update of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. This legislation calls for state and local school districts to considerably raise expectations for students in the subjects of mathematics and reading. The No Child Left Behind Act was enacted because of the need to give students the skills necessary to succeed so that more jobs stay in America, to ensure students are not being shuffled through their school system, and to give students extra help in their weak subjects.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays