Preview

Speech Against War Message

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
652 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Speech Against War Message
Speech Against War Message
As a senator of the United States, I feel it is my duty to help keep the country in a neutral state in order to stop the risk of getting into problems. At a time like this, we cannot run the risk of ruining our economy and getting involved in a national conflict. There are many points in Wilson’s war message that I would like to point out as unreasonable. Throughout the message he makes sure that he talks a lot about democracy, other nation’s choices, and future plans for the United States.
Wilson states that, “The world must be made safe for democracy.” I believe it is irrational to try to change another nation’s government, especially now in the midst of the start of a war. You cannot expect a nation’s government to change so quickly; this would take a lot of time, and would nonetheless cause many problems. We may advocate democracy and try to influence others to enforce this type of government, but going to war with another nation for this is definitely not the answer to this problem. I would also like to question this part of his speech; what is the actual intention of sending the United States into war? Is he using democracy as an excuse, or is this just a response to his wounded pride pertaining to when Zimmerman made the offer to Mexico? All Wilson wants is to keep his territory, which is part of the reason why he is sending us to war; and, although he wants to spread democracy, it does not mean that any time is the right time. There is a time and place to dispute nations’ governments, but it is not worth going to war for.
Wilson also says that, “We are accepting this challenge of hostile purpose because we know that in such a government, following such methods, we can never have a friend.” Just because you don’t agree with what a nation is doing, it does not mean that you have to go to war with them. It is not our business to get involved in foreign affairs, particularly when we know that a potential war could tamper with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to understand the situation that led to the defeat of the treaty, it is necessary to identify what the sticking point was. In this case it was Article X of the Treaty which would commit US troops to involvement in foreign affairs if another member of the league was threatened. While President Wilson called this a war of keeping the world safe for democracy so he could justify having sent troops over to Europe in the Great War (Document C) many viewed it was a marriage of America to Foreign entanglements (Document E). However Document E shows a figure labeled "US Senate" bursting through the window trying to stop this marriage. The main issue in the senate was the commitment of US troops to foreign conflicts. This issue caused Henry Cabot Lodge to lead the Republicans in the house to demand that Wilson edit this provision of the treaty. In response to this demand Wilson urged Democrats in the Senate to accept no compromises and to only offer to ratify…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the first World War, the Americans became aware of the “merchants of death” and became more determined than ever to avoid foreign wars. Moreover, they were in middle of the reconstruction from the Great Depression and the problems abroad was over the nation’s capacity. As American isolationism expanded, it influenced President Roosevelt’s foreign policy toward neutrality to keep the United States out of future wars. However, when World War II erupted in war-mad Europe, many Americans insisted on the morality of U.S. neutrality and attempted to support their friend, Great Britain, in a nominal to protect the democracies of the world. Therefore, the isolationists’ charge of Franklin Roosevelt with deception in his policies are valid to some extent since the “neutral” acts were intended to support the Allies.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This was different from Wilson’s private declarations because Wilson speaks of peace, freedom, and a possibility of peace without victory, but what actually happened was the total opposite and resulted in the United States going to war exactly what Wilson said he didn’t want to do. Wilson meant that the only peace that lasts is that which comes without a war, or victory. After war, the victor forces peace.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History 203 MidTerm

    • 1888 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mobilizing for war normally would cause outrage among the public, but that was not the case when Wilson’s war message was delivered. The public response was extremely enthusiastic; many prominent public figures endorsed the call to arms. Above all, war mobilization was a campaign to unify the country.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty of Versailles. DBQ

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On January 8, 1918, Wooldrow Wilson the president at the time, turn U.S. participation in the war into a religious crusade. He wanted to change the nature of international relations and to make the world safe for democracy. This war was merely a struggle among imperialist powers. Wooldrow Wilson announced his plan, which was meant to organize peace. These were Wilson's fourteen paints. It argued for "open covenants of peace openly arrived at" freedom of seas, equality of trade, and self-determination for all peoples. His most important point, which was the last one (14th) called for international origination, a "League of Nations", to preserve peace.…

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson’s democracy came forth in his Fourteen Points, a message of liberty and peace that played as important a part abroad as it did domestically. In large part, the Fourteen Points demanded political and economic freedom from all European nations and colonies. Most importantly, Wilson asked for a free trade, freedom of the seas, and an “open door” policy in which U.S. business relations…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progressive Hall of Fame

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During his Presidency, soon after the Germans signed the Armistice (treaty) in November of 1918, Wilson went to Paris to try to construct an “enduring peace”. President Wilson, against his doctors’ warnings, even made a national tour to persuade the public to support the Versailles Treaty. He was very religious and believed that he was guided by God’s will. Wilson also wanted to personally determine the United States’ foreign policy. He sought after freeing the United States of trusts and restoring the old economy of shops and small businesses. By doing so, he reclaimed the “Anti-Trust Act”. Wilson personally said, “Americans...are meant to carry liberty and justice and the principles of humanity wherever [they] go, [they] go out and sell goods that will make the world more comfortable and more happy, and convert them to the principles of America”. Wilson desired an “orderly change” for not only the United States, but for humanity. That is why he should be…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democratic nations are said to be less prone to making war, more economically stable, and more peaceful internally. This premise comes from what is known as the “democracy-peace theory.” Unfortunately, this theory is not completely sound. Democracies are just as likely to participate in warfare, especially if they are a newly democratized state. Studies show that within the first ten years of being established, new democracies are likely to engage in conflict with other democratic states as well as with authoritarian states (Bin. 2007). America began its road towards democracy while fighting for its freedom in the Revolutionary War. A short distance down the time line, the northern and southern parts of the…

    • 2996 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Woodrow Wilson tries to give a very interesting point in this argument. He addresses that the country of Germany was a very dangerous nation due to the fact that they were not a democratic nation as the United States. The way of thinking the Germans had during that time was much distinct from the way of thinking of Americans. He describes them as a perilous and egocentric nation. President Wilson explains that democratic nations such as the United States tend to solve their problems most of the time in a peaceful manner.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles F Wilson

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I think this letter Charles wrote had a major impact on how President Roosevelt viewed the segregation in the army. By Charles writing this letter, coming from a Negro himself, it really explains what is going on behind the scenes. I don’t think that Charles was trying to say President Roosevelt was a hypocrite. Wilson’s letter seemed to be more about the perspective of a Negro man reaching out toward a political figure that he respected, asking for President Roosevelt’s aid in addressing and hopefully correcting some of the problems in the American Army. Roosevelt wrote the Executive Order 8802, establishing the fight for democracy in the industrial work place. Now, Charles is saying…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carleton argues Wilson was not responsible for the failure of joining the League because Carleton felt that even if Wilson had agreed to the Lodge Reservation, how sure are we that by Wilson joining in, it would have been enough for America to get in the League? Carleton points out, “Under the Lodge Reservation, every signatory nation had to accept them before the United States could become a member” (194). He uses this proof to support his claim that if Wilson had agreed with the Lodge, but the U.S. still didn’t make it into the League because not all fifteen nations agreed to let us in, would we still be blaming Wilson? Carleton also states that if Wilson was as stubborn as he was made out to be, then he would have been a joke for a president. He was accused of not understanding world politics but in that day, what American statesman understood world politics more than Wilson? Carleton also dismissed the fact that Wilson was accused of not being able to compromise. He stated “If the truth of this accusation must rest on Wilson’s attitude during the Treaty fight, and I think it must, for he showed remarkable adaptability in other phases of his Presidency” (194-195). Given the situations Wilson was in as a president, from the stroke to dealing with the League, Wilson has had no choice but to adapt and compromise with certain situations. Carleton ends his claim with the focus more on Lodge because he procrastinated votes on the treaty for two weeks and made it…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Bill of Rights, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Nowhere in the First Amendment does it state that in times of war, the government can change the laws that have been made to protect the people of the United States. Although some thought President Wilson’s actions were just, he did not abide by the rules of the First Amendment, and because of that, he went too far in limiting people’s civil liberties during World War One.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson’s speech was unprecedented in terms of that it was strongly liberal, and it aimed to join nations through liberal ideology. This is different to how countries, including the USA normally ran as they were more interested in their own achievements rather than the world arena collectively. It is also important to put emphasis on the fact that the USA were the ones hoping for a…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power on the Presidents

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Michael Cairo believes that the President of the United States doesn’t have unilateral power during a war. Michael believes that the president does not have authority of having powers during a war. He believes the only way the president can do any actions is by having evidence and must meet the obligations under international law. For example during both Clinton and Bush Administration, they both relied on legal authority so that they can pursue a military force. Michael Cario believes that if the…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evaluation of a president

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Characteristics on leadership that identify Woodrow Wilson were originated from Reverend Joseph Ruggles Wilson, His father, which was a minister of the first Presbyterian Church, reverend Wilson who taught him the justification of South’s secession from the Union, inculcated his son the act of prayer and the belief that God is the guide of the human destiny; therefore all events are the will of God. Religion was Wilson’s driving force during his presidency, he believed that God had pre-ordained him as president of the united States. Woodrow Wilson believed in world peace, it was proven when he tried to keep America out of the war in World War I, with the neutrality of…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays