Is the enforcement of the pledge to the flag unconstitutional? In the case Minersville School District v. Gobitis of 1940, the court upheld a Pennsylvania state law requiring all students to say the pledge to the flag. The case was brought to court because it was common practice to expel students from school that were not complying with the law. The children at the heart of the case were ten and twelve years old, and had been kicked out of school. They were refusing to pledge because it conflicted with their Jehovah’s Witnesses beliefs.…
All students must be silent, as said in a memo. According to page one it says “Say, ‘please all rise and stand at respectful, silent attention for the playing of our national anthem’” This applies because it is directly stated in the memo .On page 44 Mr. Benison says “Right ‘respect, silence, and attention,’ I think the rule reads.” Even a teacher, says that all students must be quiet.…
As a very high priced and respected legal advisor I would advise Ms. Charmander of her legal rights. I would also advise her of her duties as a teacher. In this scenario Ms. Charmander has an academic freedom to decide what she wants to teach in her classroom. She also feels as if the Pledge of Allegiance is promoting the endorsement of religion. Which is not allowed in a public school setting. Her students also have a 1st amendment right to hear and say the Pledge of Allegiance. The state cannot prevent people from practicing or expressing themselves as long as they are not disruptive. Ms. Charmander also has the responsibility to teach what the school has set in their curriculum. Teachers are generally allowed some of their own freedoms in how they deliver their curriculum. In this case it seems if the school is set on this particular subject. In fact…
People who affiliate with the right-wing, all to often, conveniently neglect the First Amendment when it concerns matters regarding racial equality. The stains of the past cannot/should not be forgotten as hideous elements linger on in our current culture. I speak, of course, of the disproportionate incarceration rates of African Americans compared to whites and the proliferation of the number of instances when police officers use deadly force against minority populations. This, and this alone, was Colin Kaepernick's original message when he courageously took a knee during the National Anthem. The distortion of this fact and the deflection towards disrespecting the military and our country omits the central issue…
Imagine being penalized for performing an action within the rights of all American citizens. Athletes are being punished for using their platform and not standing for the National Anthem. However, standing for the anthem is not a required action American citizen must do by law. Standing for the national anthem is an acti9n U.S. citizens are expected to do. However, athletes are not standing for the anthem to make a political statement about a belief. Furthermore, athletes should have a choice to stand for the National anthem without being…
The children standing close together show a world of no discrimination towards one another, as there had been before. In the picture there are races of different nationalities including Asian, African American, Native American, Latin American, etc. The children have their hands across their chest showing a sign of dedication to what they know as America. This demonstration depicts a story of our American History as it should be today. Although there is still some prejudice in America, we have still overcome a lot of changes that will give hope to children to see a better…
The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…
When they added the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, it struck a controversy. Which some people argued it violates their First Amendment. But the phrase reflects America’s civic culture and it isn’t necessarily a religious statement. Though, people has the right to say the Pledge omitting the phrase, thus not violating their freedom of religion.…
In Gwen Wilde’s essay, “Why the Pledge of Allegiance Should Be Revised,” the author strongly believes that the pledge of allegiance should only be used for the sole purpose of patriotism. She includes in the essay the original pledge of allegiance, which was published in 1892 and did not include the words “under God.” In 1923, the pledge was revised for the first time replacing the original words, “my flag” with “the flag of the united states,” only to be revised the following year to “the flag of the United States of America.” In 1942 the US congress officially sanctioned the pledge. Finally, In 1954 President Dwight D. Eisenhower approved the addition of the words “under God” to the pledge of allegiance, which brings us to the authors argument of why the pledge should be revised.…
Does standing up for liberty simply mean to stand up just for those in this country? Are the rights in the Declaration of Independence only inherent to those in this country, or are they instead fundamental human rights wherever humanity exists? The rights of men to be treated equally should not be limited only to American citizens but to human beings everywhere striving to be free. Anyone serious about the movement of liberty has the responsibility to speak up for the voiceless and those who can’t speak for themselves.…
The pledge of allegiance has remained an important part of the American legacy and culture. It takes part in the American school system, in American sports, and in many other areas. Many say that the pledge holds a place in their hearts, where it allows them to show their pride for their country. But in this pledge there are two words that have a tendency ring in the ears of many Americans, “under god.” In a country that is proud of the separation of church and state, we leave these words in a pledge that is said everyday by millions of Americans who believe and trust the right of separation of church of state yet we fail to do this for a major component in American culture. The words “under god” hold little meaning and should not be placed in the pledge of allegiance, they should be removed permanently.…
My choice of writing for the Rogerian essay is on the topic of the Pledge of Allegiance in School. “In a decision that stunned the nation, a federal appeals court in June ruled that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools is unconstitutional because the pledge contains the words "under God" “ (Chmielewski). The banning of the Pledge of Allegiance is a very large controversial topic because one side believes that while the foundation of our country is religion, the other side believes that the reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance is an infringement on our First Amendment right. The Pledge of Allegiance began in 1892. It was a way of showing a sense of celebration for being an American. Since 1892…
In addition, the notorious flag has remained a racist symbol. Although decades have passed since the Civil Rights movement, the use of the flag in opposition can be paralleled to the current issues of today, especially in regards to African-Americans. The flag, which has historically served as a token of opposition to movements and government acts that promoted racial equality among African-Americans and whites, has been used by racist and white supremacist groups among the likes of the Ku Klux Klan and Dixiecrats to oppress advocates of equality (Lowery 1). In regards to white supremacy, the flag has always remained a symbol of entitlement and superiority against minorities. There are still Southern pride rallies across the South that promotes…
“It’s better for them to stay split up,,” I said to Curtis. “Isn’t it?” (12)…
Especially to those dew drops who have made their presence in the lawns of this college for the first time, I called the Dew drops yes they are because we believe that they are as pure as the purity in the drops of dew we observe on the grass early in the morning. And now is the time to impel along with that purity in them the moral values so that they will shine in heights of the sky this also is a fact that they also have entered this premises with an aim to groom their life. Which implies that they have entered the college life where from they will come out to be the future of tomorrow’s society.…