Dr. Palleni's Argument

“The truth is rarely pure and never simple.” -Oscar Wilde If, the case went to court, Miss Narwin would win. Miss Narwin is the victim, which is proved, since all things are taken against her.
All students must be silent, as said in a memo. According to page one it says “Say, ‘please all rise and stand at respectful, silent attention for the playing of our national anthem’” This applies because it is directly stated in the memo .On page 44 Mr. Benison says “Right ‘respect, silence, and attention,’ I think the rule reads.” Even a teacher, says that all students must be quiet. . Phillip was being disobedient and was given a chance to apologize. On page 63 Dr. Palleni says “Miss Narwin asked you to stop. You didn’t. You continued to sing. You were disobedient. So she asked you to leave. Dr. Palleni says Phillip is being disobedient. On page 76 Dr Palleni says to Miss Narwin “I offered to get him out of this business by coming back and apologizing, but he won’t. Two-day suspension.” He offered to let Phillip apologize, yet he didn’t. On page 90 Dr Palleni states “The rule. Two infractions in one week. Dr. Palleni was enforcing the rule.. On page 115 Dr Palleni says to Dr Doane “Besides I
Narwin says “I don’t know who that is, but you heard Dr. Doane request silence.” She gives Phillip a warning. On page 113 Miss Narwin says “The boy was creating a serious disturbance.” She tells what happened and proves that she kicked him out, not suspended him. If the case went to court, then Phillip Malloy would win. On page 51 Phillip says “What would you say if a teacher said I wasn’t allowed to sing ‘The Star-Spangled Banner?” First of all, it is rule to remain silent, second of all Ms Narwin gave Phillip a warning, and lastly, he was humming not singing. It’s just a thing I like to do. Sing along when the song is played.” Phillip never sang in Mr. Lunser’s room, and again, he is humming not