Preview

Stanford Prison Experiment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1163 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanford Prison Experiment
Does prison make the inner demon come out in the prisoner/guard or is the prisoner /guard already wired that way? The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. This experiment was led by a psychology professor named Philip Zimbardo, he had the help of a team of researchers. The purpose of this particular experiment was to induce disorientation, depersonalization, and DE individualization in the participants. After a period of time behind bars everyone would act out of character.
Psychology professor, Philip Zimbardo, and his team of researchers set out to prove whether or not the hypothesis that the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards are the main cause of abusive
…show more content…
They had over seventy men apply, in order to narrow down who they would pick the applicants had to undergo an extensive number of tests. This was to insure they were not mentally unstable in any way. the experimenters picked twenty-four boys and divided them into two groups.one group being the, “prisoners” and the other group was the, “prison guards”. They were all given details on the experiment, and its seriousness. Each of them were given a consent form to sign. In order to make this all seem real they arrested each prisoner and transported to the make shift jail. When they arrived to the jail they were greeted by the warden, “David Jaffe”, an undergraduate of Stanford University. The warden then would tell each prisoner about the crime they had committed. Quickly after this the prisoners would be strip searched. All the naked prisoners were then sprayed down for lice and bacteria that they could be carrying. This made them extremely uncomfortable. They were then given a uniform with their prison identification number. Each prisoner was to wear a chain around their ankle, this was a method used to manipulate the brain to believe that this was a real prison environment. Now that …show more content…
The atmosphere the prisoners were put in was just like that of a real prison. Which simulated a true prison life atmosphere. I was not surprised of the outcome. The power the guards were given just took control over them. The experiment was not humane. Seems that when the guards lost control, they got lost between what was real and what was all an experiment and when they lost those senses everything humane was lost as well. One way that could have improved the experiment would have been to give the guards a strict set of guidelines to follow. To have been given specific do’s and don’ts. If these guidelines were broken, then then there would be repercussions. Maybe this way things would not have gotten out of hand. Guards should have been taught principles to improve self-control. In the experiment I saw the law of effect come into play. As the prisoners were treated badly for misbehaving they began to misbehave less. This was due to the reinforcement the guards used. Therefore, operant conditioning had occurred after a few days. This is the process in which, behavior is shaped and maintained by its consequences. Punishment was also enforced in this experiment. They used positive reinforcement by rewarding the ones who behaved and put them in the privilege cell. This method of reinforcement was supposed to encourage the person to continue to behave. Dr. Zimbardo, also used what is called observational learning. While the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that Philip Zimbardo evented. He wanted to study the human response of captivity, of the prison life. Zimbardo randomly assigned roles to the prisoners and the guards. Each role was uniquely identified. For example, he gave the guards sticks and sunglasses and the prisoners were arrested by the police department and were forced into the basement of the jail which was converted into the psychology department that was converted into a makeshift jail. Zimbardo wanted the experiment to be as realistic as he possibly could have made it, therefore, he assigned each role to help do so. Testing each individual and then assigning them to roles would of gave inconclusive readings and therefore, it was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When people are given little to no direction or training, and are faced with dealing with people they may perceive as a threat to their own safety and the well-being of others, they have a propensity to overstep what most would consider reasonable behavior. The “guards” in the experiment were put into a position of authority and took the steps they deemed necessary to maintain order. In spite of the fact that they knew it was an experiment, they were immersed in the situation and played the role given them. The “prisoners” played their part and were so wholly immersed in the role and the environment that their entire perspective of reality was altered. They began to believe they were helpless and unable to help themselves out of the situation they found themselves. They had become powerless to change the situation, in spite of the fact that it was just an…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971, psychologist Phillip Zimbardo set out to create an experiment that looked at the impact of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. The experiment was to test human behavior when one's role had been altered into authoritative one. Still powerful after all these years the experiment was the most powerful and popular experiment of all time (O'Toole, K). Researches set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University building. There were the 24 students out of 70 volunteers chosen to play the roles of the prisoners or prison guards.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My first impression from watching the film was the relationship between the study’s prisoners and guards seemed friendly at first. Though they’re encouraged by Zimbardo and his associates to take the experiment seriously and to invest themselves fully in their roles, the subjects initially still understand that they’re not really in a prison but then, the experiment takes a turn when a guard named Christopher Archer begins to embrace a meaner personality one, in which I suspect from watching the experiment, is not his normal demeanor but, rather, a more boosted version of himself of which he perceives to be his role. Archer introduces an element of meanness to the proceedings, altering the prisoners’ mindset the prisoners start to feel dehumanization…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Qlt1 Task 1

    • 2535 Words
    • 11 Pages

    He gave them each a psychological examination in order to establish normality. The participants were then randomly selected to be either guards or prisoners; the environment was kept as true to life as possible including ‘prisoners’ being arrested unknowingly at home. Zimbardo became the Governor. The experiment was to last 2 weeks but was prematurely ended after 6 days due to emotional distress of the…

    • 2535 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment began just like any other, with a general question: “Would a negative environment would be able to control…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment had several important implications. One of which derives from average males that were so drastically affected under the burdens of being placed in a confinement setting. When these outcomes are correlated to the much more long- term and harshness of a real prison, you can only imagine the adverse effects on the real criminals serving jail…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This study is considered a classic when with regards to prison psychology. According to the American Psychological Association (2004) “Its messages have been carried in many textbooks in the social sciences, in classroom lectures across many nations, and in popular media renditions. Its web site has gotten over 15 million unique page views in the past four years, and more than a million a week in the weeks following the expose of the abuse of Iraqi prisoners by American Military Police army reservists in Abu Ghraib Prison”. Zimbardo’s research has come to be known as one of the classical example of how circumstantial power has the ability to influence individuals in multiple domains. This experiment is historically one of the prime examples of how even the most “good” person when placed under specific situations can in turn transform into “evil”. It shows just how easily individuality can be stripped away and in turn how the environment can define and dictate ones…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Eperiment

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The experiment took place in the basement of the Psychology department in Stanford University and selected 24 undergraduate students out of 70 volunteers due to their lack of psychological issues and had no criminal record. Zimbardo paid each of the 24 participants 15 dollars a day in a span of one to two weeks. The 24 volunteers were randomly assigned to play a role as either a guard or a prisoner. The cell was made up of three prison cells, each one holding three mock prisoners. The guards chosen had to work in an eight hour shift alongside two other participants. The guards chosen have their own cell to themselves and one small room for solitary confinement. Kendra Cherry stated in her article that, “According to Zimbardo and his colleagues, the Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrates the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior” (Cherry). The volunteers for this experiments took on their role almost instantaneously.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While the Stanford Prison Experiment was originally expected to last 14 days, it had to be stopped after just six due to what was happening to the student participants. The guards became abusive, and the prisoners began to show signs of extreme stress and anxiety. While the prisoners and guards were allowed to interact in any way they wanted, the interactions were hostile or even dehumanizing.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The experiment lacked a controlled, independent variable as Zimbardo lost his identity and kept excusing the guards’ behavior. He lost sight of the real purpose of the experiment and treated the boys as subjects rather than humans. This experiment had numerous errors. Obviously, Zimbardo should not have been switching from being a part of the experiment to just observing. In addition, there should have been more psychologists there from the beginning for Zimbardo to discuss with. It should have not taken until Maslach’s visit for someone to realize this experiment has gone extremely wrong. Personally, I thought this experiment was very out of line and should not have happened. Though I always see the value in scientific testing, but the Stanford Prison Experiment went too far. It unnecessarily dehumanized the prisoners. After the first mental breakdown of the prisoners, the experiment should have ended. The Stanford Prison Experiment did help Zimbardo with understanding the incidents at Abu Ghraib, Iraq, but it seems pretty obvious that “power without oversight” can lead to horrendous events, especially when people lack the guidance and…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to continue the experiment, deception and manipulation had to be used on the prisoners and their families. The basement was cleaned, rearranged and made presentable for outsiders. The prisoners were groomed, feed a hot meal and warned about not complaining when the families arrived or the visit would be cut short. The families were greeted by Susie the receptionist to keep up appearances and to entertain for an additional thirty minutes as they continued to prepare. Even though the prisoners were only allowed two visitors, for ten minutes while the guards watched, the families left content. Rumors begin to circulate that prisoner 8612 was planning to come back with a crowd and force the release of the remaining prisoners. Zimbardo had no choice but to send the students to another location, in case anyone showed up. Even though no one showed up, someone was going to pay for the hard work that the guards put in. With no surprise, day four came with an increase in humiliation, dehumanization and more unnecessary punishment to the prisoners. On top of regular work, they were forced to shine the guard’s shoes. The guards were taking their roles in the experiment very seriously. They were not tolerating any disrespect and had no problems asserting their superiority over the prisoners. Almost everyone was falling in line and accepting their order except prisoner 819. He did not partipcate in the 6 am count and refused to exercise. Going even further, he trashed his cell and barricaded himself in. He was not punished by himself but also the other prisoners. Eventually, he was thrown into the hole. A priest came to visit, and accessed the situation. Prisoner 819 agreed to meet with him, and broke down. It was so severe that he was taken away to be comforted with food and rest. The priest advised them that their stimulation was very convincing and was similar to a prison with first time offenders. Around 11:30 pm the guards gathered the…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even "good" people can be beaten down by conditions, such as those simulated in the experiment, to a point where they are no longer sure of their own identity. If anything, this experiment should have taught players in the criminal justice system just how desperately prison reform is needed. Sadly, conditions such as these continue to persist and have even been the cause of recent controversy as seen in the instances of Abu Ghrab and Guantanamo Bay prisons.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prisoners were punished and not given their natural rights. The prisoners were treated unfairly. The guards began breaking the rules of the contract that they signed before they started the experiment. The conductors of the experiment, including Philip Zimbardo, didn’t want to get involved because it could have affected the results of the experiment. At this point, things became too real. It was hard to tell if it was a real prison or just an experiment. The guards were torturing the prisoners and the prisoners couldn’t do anything about it. They could leave, but they needed the money. The prisoners were abused and the guards were extremely aggressive. The participants of the experiment turned into completely different people. This is known as the Lucifer effect.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fake prisoners and fake guards in a spurious jail is a peculiar way to determine roles in society. Philip G. Zimbardo was the mastermind of the Stanford Prison Experiment, which was a psychological experiment that determined the roles of members in a society that became a fiasco (“Philip G. Zimbardo” 1). The experiment left emotional and mental scars on mock-prisoner lives. The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) illustrates the way a person changes when a label and power is all of a sudden given to hoax guards in order to control fraud prisoners.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays