Preview

Stanley Milgram Obedience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
692 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanley Milgram Obedience
e term ‘Ethics’ refers to the basic concepts and the essential principles of decent human conduct. Humanity thrives off of ethics as it enables humans with the responsibility to try and prevent unethical behaviour that has the possibility to cause physiological and psychological harm to the participants involved. Ethics in research are a vital component of experimentation in psychology as there is a set of rules/guidelines set to try and preserve the rights and privacy of the participants. A list of nine ethical guidelines which aims to prevent unethical behaviour that could cause psychological and physiological harm to the participants. This essay aims to discuss the Stanley Milgram obedience to authority experiment and how it relates to the …show more content…
The first rule that was breached was “Respect the dignity and wellbeing of participants, including their welfare, rights, beliefs, perceptions, customs and cultural heritage.” Whenever the participants asked or pleaded to leave or stop the experiment, they were enforced to continue. They were exposed to stressful situations, showing clear signs of distress in each participant, some of the signs included; sweating, stuttering and trembling etc. Milgram also said that 3 participants had full-blown seizures while participating in this experiment. This also relates to the other three principles that were also breached which includes; “Ensure that research is designed to maximise any benefits to participants and society, and to minimise risks of possible harm or discomfort – psychological, emotional, and physical – to participants,” “Respect the right of individuals not to participate, or to withdraw from the research at any time without explanation, and without reprisal,” and “Inform participants of the nature and purpose of the research, and any physical or psychological effects that may be expected if the research is likely cause the participant physical or mental stress.” The participants were clearly forced into situations that could have caused them psychologically or even physiologically damage. It was evident that they were not informed of the nature of the experiments beforehand and genuinely thought that they were harming the learner. The complete disregard of the ethical principles influenced the experiments majorly as they were trying to research the obedience to authority, by forcing the participants to go on regardless of their thoughts or feelings

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nearly half a century after they were conducted, Milgram’s (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies remain among psychology’s most widely known and most often discussed experiments. Briefly, under the guise of a learning study, an experimenter instructed participants to administer increasingly powerful electric shocks to a ‘‘learner’’ when the learner made mistakes on a memory task. Although in reality no shocks were delivered, participants were instructed to start with a 15-volt shock for the learner’s first mistake and to increase the voltage in 15-volt increments for each successive mistake. In the basic procedure (Experiment 5), participants could hear the learner’s vocal protests and demands to be set free through the wall that separated…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In society, authority and its rules are respected by people in the community through acts of obedience. Authority is not only the government laws, but can also be people with a higher status, such as parents, teachers, or employment managers. As long as people obey those with authoritative power, they will receive rewards, or at least avoid punishment, even when the command requires unjust actions towards another person. For example, Hitler’s propaganda that made the Germans believe that the Jews were the source of their economic problems and scapegoated them in world war two. And years after the Holocaust, some Germans deny their part in the abuse towards the genocide of six million Jews. In other words, people who deny their part in an unjust action place the blame on…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past century, the field of Psychology has prospered, giving way to a more in depth knowledge and understanding of people’s social interactions with one another and what drives those connections. 20th century psychologist, Stanley Milgram, executed a series of Obedience to Authority test on random participants. As seen in the YouTube videos online and in class, Milgram’s study found that over 65% of the participants carried out the experiment, despite potentially hurting someone, due to the authority figure urging them to continue.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgrams experiments are some of the most recognized behavior experiments in psychology today. Milgrams most known experiment was ‘shocking’ to people and has also been controversial ethically. As Ian Parker stated it would “make his name and destroy his reputation.” Parkers Obedience essay talks much of Milgrams life before the experiment and how the psychology community thought about his ethics.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    milgrams obedience study

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Basically, he had trained an accomplice who would pretend to have electric shocks. The experimental subjects were placed in front of a dial, which they were told would administer an increasing levels of electric shocks to the actor. They asked the subject a series of straightforward word pair questions, and when he got the answers wrong, they had to give an electric shock. The subjects were told that this was part of an experiment, by someone in a white coat. In one case, the subject was informed that the person they were administering "shocks" to had a heart condition.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” (Henry Thoreau) This famous quote is taken from the famous essay Civil Disobedience written in 1848, Civil Disobedience still stands as an expression of moral and individual conscience against a un just government. To begin, the quote written by Henry Thoreau, “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” is essentially saying If following the law results in a wrong done to another person, then do not follow the law, and that morals from human to human come before government rules or laws resulting in disobedience.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While the test subject is in complete control over when the experiment can be stopped based on their own level of morals, it would not be considered proper to put the test subject in an environment like this that could be perceived as “hostile” without their complete knowledge of their part in the experiment. It would be impossible to inform the test subjects about the extremely stressful experiment they would be taking place in without informing them on exactly what they would be doing, and in this experiment, the discretion of the test was important to get clear and true results. Another immoral part of Milgram’s experiment was the severe psychological stress imposed on the applicants. Numerous participants stated that they felt extremely uncomfortable about what they were expected to do, although a sizable amount of the members in the primary trials subsequently pronounced that they felt vastly pleased to have been chosen to take part in the experiment. Another immoral aspect of the experiment was the fact that the test subject was not expressly given the right to withdrawal from the experiment, and were continuously given orders to continue the experiment. Milgram claimed that in this experiment strict orders were essential to…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yale University psychologist, Stanley Milgram, conducted an experiment in 1961 focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from their superiors. Milgram's experiment, which he told his participants was about learning, was to have participants (teacher) question another participant (learner), and when the learner got a question wrong the teacher would shock the learner. For every question wrong, the teacher would increase the amount of volts used in the shock. Of course the experiment was actually about obedience, the learner was an experimenter, and the shock was faked (McLeod). Milgram's was one of the first psychology experiments to use…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The APA’s Ethical Principles includes five basic principles (“Ethical Principles”). Principle A, Beneficence and Nonmaleficence, states that psychologists seek to “be aware of the possible effect of their own physical and mental health”. Obviously, Zimbardo could not have been completely aware of the possible effect and it is clear in the experiment that he was not thinking far into the future. Principle B, Fidelity and Responsibility, describes the importance of colleagues working together and establishing relationships with each other. This principle emphasizes the importance of being aware of conflicts of interest. Although Zimbardo may have been unbiased in the beginning, he ended up losing sight of the situation and overlooking abusive behavior (“Zimbardo”). Considering the experiment went on for much longer than it should have, Zimbardo’s colleagues clearly did not work together well. Principle C, Integrity, seeks to have psychologists strive to “keep their promise and to avoid unwise or unclear commitments”. Although prisoners and prison guards were aware that they were taking part in a mock prison experiment, they did not truly understand what they were getting themselves into. Zimbardo failed to respect the rights of his participants by omitting this information. Principle D, Justice, is perhaps the standard that was violated the most. Essentially, participants legally should have been able to leave at any time. All of the participants’ rights were taken away during the experiment, and that was certainly illegal. The fifth and final principle, Respect for Peoples’ Rights and Dignity, is related to…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram's experiment in 1960 by social psychologist Dr. Stanely Milgram's (1963, 1965) was a controversial experiment. He researched the effect of authority on obedience. I don't think the scientific community overreacted to this experiment because it is unethical to reduce subjects to "twitching shuttering wrecks". Though the human mind is amazing strong we still do not know its breaking point. For interviewers to carry out the kind of experiment they did, they have to be willing to face the consequences of the experiment which could be a permanent damaged mental state. I do believe we need to do experiments like this as the outcome was very eye opening but it has to be better regulated and the background and methods of experimentation clearly…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics are a very important part of psychological research, not only for the researcher, but also for the participant(s). Researchers have a duty to protect the participants from any kind of harm or injury. There is not one exact definition of ethics, as there are many. In this paper I will discuss what I believe the definition of ethics to be, along with the connection between deception and ethics. Deception is also an important issue when dealing with ethics and psychological research. I will also discuss the risk/benefit ratio when related to ethics and deception. When does the risk of the experiment outweigh the benefits of it?…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ethical concerns in the experiment were also argued by Baumrind (1964) ‘…. The feelings and rights of Milgram’s participants have been abused and inadequate measures were taken to protect them from stress and emotional conflict (Gross, 2015). However, in Milgram's defence he argued that participants had agreed to take part and some people could have left if they really wanted to. The participants had also a full…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram experimented with the theory that people will likely submit and follow an authority figure. He determined this from a famous experiment he conducted named the Milgram Obedience Experiment. In this test, he gathered random people and assigned them as the “teacher”, and placed them in a room with the controls for a shock machine (with various settings, from slight shock to XXX). Then he placed a confederate in a room, attached to a shock machine, who was the “student”. The “teacher” was to ask them questions and for every they got wrong, the “teacher” had to shock them, however the “student” was simply just pretending to get shocked. As the experiment continued, the “student” would begin to ask to be released or complain about…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays