Marilyn Esthappan
Lab Partner: Nisha Sunny
TA: Sajjad Tahir
Physics Lab 106
May 29, 2011
1-3pm
THEORY:
Statistical variation and measurement uncertainty are unavoidable. A theory is consistent if the measurement is 2m +/- 1m. Uncertainty rises from statistical variation, measurement precision, or systematic error.
EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW:
Part 1. Coin Toss: Statistical Variation:
Sixteen coins were tossed nine times and the number of heads was counted to determine variation associated with random events.
Part 2. Measurement Precision:
The measurements (length, width, and height) of the wood block were taken with a ruler to estimate the preciseness of using a ruler. The uncertainty of each measurement was measured because this is how much how much the preciseness of the ruler is off. The mass of the block was taken using a scale. All measurements have an uncertainty that effects its calculations.
DATA:
Part 1. Coin Toss: Statistical Variation:
Number of Times for Heads | The Range of Heads Between 6 and 10 | Average for Heads | 7 +/- 8 | 6 | Y | Sigma | 1 +/- 5 | 5 | N | Average per Penny with 16 Pennies | 0 +/- 5 | 7 | Y | Sigma per Penny | 0 +/- 1 | 7 | Y | Percentage Uncertainty | 20% | 8 | Y | Sum of Number of Heads for 144 Pennies | 70 | 9 | Y | Average per Penny for the Whole 144 Set of Coins | 0 +/- 51 | 9 | Y | Sigma per Penny Using Sigma of 6 | 0 +/- .4 | 10 | Y | Percentage Uncertainty | 7.8% | 9 | Y | |
Part 2. Measurement Precision:
| Length (cm) | Width (cm) | Height(cm) | Mass (g) | | Area(cm^2) | Volume(cm^3) | Density(g/cm^3) | Measure | 20 +/- 3 | 8 +/- 5 | 3 +/-6 | 309 +/- 1 | | 172 +/- 5.5 | 621 +/- 1.8 | 0 +/- 4.97601 | Uncertainty | 0 +/- 1 | 0 +/- 1 | 0 +/- .5 | 0 +/-1 | | | | | Maximum | 20 +/- 4 | 8 +/-6 | 3 +/- 6.5 | 309 +/-2 | | 175 +/- 4.4 | 640 +/- 3.56 | 0 +/- 4.82856 | | | | | | Difference | 2 +/- 8.9 | 19 +/- 1.76 | 0 +/- .147 | | | | | | | | | | Percentage | 0.493 | 1.177 | 1.389 | 0 032 | | 1.700 | 3.087 | 2.954 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Expected Percentage | 1+/- 6.69 | 3 +/- 8.9 | 3 +/-1.19 | | Expected Uncertainty (Expected Difference) | 2 +/- 9 | 19 +/- 2 | 0 +/- 1.6 |
DATA, ERROR AND UNCERTAINITY ANALYSIS:
Part 1. Coin Toss: Statistical Variation:
All of the calculations were done on Excel. The data shows 8 out of the 9 tosses, between 6 and 10 coins the coins appeared as heads; giving the average of 7.8 for a coin to be heads. This agrees with the theory of statistical variation since the average was off by 2 in comparison to the actual average of 8. Data is given for 9 tosses with 16 pennies and then with 144 pennies. The data for the 144 pennies wasn’t given by actual tosses, but by calculations. More pennies for tossing gave more variation and less room for uncertainty. The average was calculated by adding the column of heads and dividing by 9. The sigma was calculated by taking the stranded deviation of the column of heads. The percentage uncertainty was calculated by multiplying 100 by the sigma divided by the average.
Part 2. Measurement Precision:
All of the calculations were done on Excel. The data shows the measurements for the wooden block. The maximum calculations are the measured value increased by the uncertainty. The maximum area, volume, and density were calculated by using their formulas (Area=L*W, Volume=L*W*H, Density=M/V). The difference was calculated by subtracting the maximum value from the measure volume. Then the percentage uncertainty was calculated with its formula (100(uncertainty)/(original value)). The expected percentage in area was calculated by the addition of percentage uncertainties in length and width. For volume, the percentage volume was calculated by the sum of the percentage uncertainties in volume. For density, the percentage uncertainty was calculated by the sum of the percentage uncertainties in volume and mass.
CONCLUSIONS:
Part 1:
Statistical variation decreases with the number of pennies. The amount of pennies tossed doesn’t affect the outcome that there is a fifty-fifty chance of heads. As shown in the experiment the average for head was .5 regardless if there were 16 or 144 pennies tossed. The answers to the questions in the instructions follow below:
1.2 Only once was 8 heads were obtained with the average of 7.8 heads.
1.3 8 out of 9 times heads were obtained within the expected range of 6-10. Yes, it was about 2/3 of the time.
1.4 The standard deviation of the data is 1 +/- 5. It is similar to the expected values of sigma expected = 2.
1.5 The number of heads measured varies, but has an average of 7.8 of being heads. Yes, this does agree with theoretical value of 8 because 7.8 is -2 less than 8 which is an acceptable difference.
1.6 Yes, the coins are fair because the expected values is 0.48.
1.7 The percentage uncertainty is 7 +/- 8.
1.8 The total number of heads is 70 out of 144 pennies. No, it does it because the theory says the total number of heads should be 72. The average per penny for the whole 144 pennies is 0 +/- 5. The uncertainty per penny is 0 +/- .4. The percentage uncertainty is 7.8%. It is less than for 16 pennies, because increasing the number of measurements decreases the statistical percentage uncertainty.
Part 2. Measurements Precision:
Measurements have an uncertainty because they are limited by the instruments; therefore affecting calculations. There could also be a possible human error in all the calculations due to measuring or reading a measurement. The answers to the questions in the instructions follow below:
2.1 The smallest increment on the balance scale is grams.
2.5 The computed area is 175 +/- 4.4 cm^2. The computed volume is 640 +/- 1.8 cm^3. The computed density is 0 +/- 4.82856 g/cm^3.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Measurements were made of the distance of fall (Y) at each of the four precisely measured times.…
- 260 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
| |Unit measurement: The data type should be consistent. For instance, if data is being collected on red blocks, all data should be based directly on red blocks alone. |…
- 622 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Select File > Save Worksheet As to save the data set. You must either keep a copy of this data or download it again off the web site for future labs.…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The mass can be measured by using a balance. The length and width can be measured by using a meter stick. The mass found with the balance will go into the mass area of the formula. The length and width will be part of the volume portion of the formula. The volume part of the formula will also have the undetermined variable of the thickness. This is the case because:…
- 1278 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Let X represent the amount of time it takes a student to park in the library parking lot at the university. If we know that the distribution of parking times can be modeled using an exponential distribution with a mean of 4 minutes, find the probability that it will take a randomly selected student more than 10 minutes to park in the library lot.…
- 2762 Words
- 12 Pages
Good Essays -
Use Equation Editor to show how you calculated the concentration of Fe(II) in the stock solution.…
- 278 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Use of the Internet has resulted in recognition that information technology security is of major importance to our society. This concern seems relatively new in healthcare, but information technology security is a well established domain. A large body of knowledge exists that can be applied to protect healthcare information. A general understanding of security can be obtained by understanding: 1. Security Components 2.…
- 3844 Words
- 14 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In your own words, interpret the data and note the shape of the distribution of the data provided from the Case Study: Highest Paid Women (Chapter 2, p. 35). To help guide your interpretation, include the following:…
- 509 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A tutorial was given to help explain the process and purpose of prediction intervals. Following the tutorial, a quiz was taken. The results from the quiz are shown in Figure 1.…
- 691 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
2. Distinguish between random (statistical) error and systematic error, and give an example of each.…
- 462 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The uncertainty reduction theory was created with intention of giving an explanation to an everyday occurrence when encountering new people. The theory gives reason to something everyday people experience regularly without consciously thinking about it. Psychology had attempted to explain the emotional process of first encounters but never like this. Although a lot of thought and consideration had been put into this, there was no way it could consistently cover every aspect it addresses. Diving further into the concepts and ideas presented can help give a better understanding of the way we interact with society.…
- 1240 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Faith, by definition, is the ability to put absolute trust in a laudable source. Faith looks simple on paper, but many struggle with the idea. The setback is finding a trustworthy source to put faith in. Complete certainty is no easy task, but is a life full of doubt much better? It is often believed that if no room is left for doubt, disappointment is inevitable; that if doubt is allowed and expectations are lowered, happiness will only increase because disappointment will be rare. But if you have never been disappointed, are you even truly living?…
- 533 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
UDJ | FINANCE | Use/Name | Formula | Use/Name | Formula | Variance (2) (For Poisson, equal to mean) | or n*p*(1-p) | NPV (Costs up front) | | Standard Deviation () | | Discount Factor | _1_ (1+r)n | Exp. Val E(W) of combined linear function | a + bμx + cμx Where b&c are weights | Annuity Discount Factor | 1-DF or 1-_1_ k ( 1+r)n k | Variance (2) of combined lin funct (X,Y) | b2V(x)+c2V(y)+2bc•Cov(x,y) Where b&c are weights | Annuity Present Value | CF X ADF or | Covariance | x y COR(X,Y) | Annuity Future Value | | Correlation (ρ) | | Annuity Payment | | Mean | fixi | Growing Annuity Present Value | | Variance Of a Sample (s2) | sqrt to get std dev (s) | Perpetuity Present Value | CF K | Standard Error (Then to Margin of Error & Confidence Interval) | s/√n where s= √x̄(1- x̄) [* (Zɑ/2) for MoE] [ ↳ ± x̄ for CI] | Bond Duration | | Required Sample Size (rework of above) | or | Variance (2) of a portfolio (X,Y) | b2E(x) 2+c2E(y) 2 +2bc•Cov(x,y) Where b&c are weights | Confidence Interval For a proportion | | Sharpe Ratio | | Zobs | | Exp. Return of a portfolio | | Test Statistic Z values Proportions Take this to the table for “P Value” | | β of a portfolio | or | X critical proportions | Evaluation criteria: | CML Equation | | | | Cost of Levered Equity | | | | WACC | | | | Levered vs.…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
To find the uncertainties associated with this lab we used the direct method. For the mass, we took our smallest weight that we added and used half of that as our uncertainty. That means that our mass had an uncertainty of ±1g. Our angle uncertainty was half of a tick mark or ±0.50ͦ.…
- 718 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays