Preview

Statute Of Frauds: The Little Steel Company

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
478 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Statute Of Frauds: The Little Steel Company
The Little Steel Company is a small steel fabricator that makes steel parts for various metal machine shops. When Little receives an order from a client, it must locate and purchase 10 tons of a certain grade of steel to complete the order. Little sends an e-mail message to West Coast Steel Company inquiring into the availability of 10 tons of the described grade of steel. West Coast replies by e-mail that it has available the required 10 tons of steel and quotes $450 per ton. Little replies by e-mail that it will purchase the 10 tons of described steel at the quoted price. The e-mails are signed electronically by Little and West Coast. There is no date set forth in the e-mails for delivery. When the steel arrives, Little rejects shipment, claiming the steel was shipped too late. When West Coast sues Little for breach of contract, Little also raises the defense of the Statute of Frauds. Who wins, and why? …show more content…
In 1999, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act was put into effect that gave authorization to enter into contracts by way of email. The UETA mainly permits the writings and signatures of parties involved by either email or fax, or even a voice recording, doing away with the prerequisite that there must be a physical document that all parties must physically sign. The UETA has been adopted by 48 states and Congress in whole or in part.
Because two parties can agree, sign, and barter copies of a contract without ever meeting face to face, signing a physical document, or producing a hard copy of an agreement, West Coast has a great case against Little. The law states that such an agreement can be just as valid as a written agreement using actual

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This case is an interesting one because it gets right into the core of the confliction between the proprieties of contractual agreement. This case is focused primarily on Osborne Development Corp. and the multiple defects customers are experiencing with their homes. These upset customers are suing this Corporation in attempts to collect reparations for the discrepancies faced. The homeowners who purchased homes form Osborne Development Corp. (ODC) negligently purchased these homes. According to the Home Buyers Warranty ( HBW), “ Any and all claims disputes and controversies by or between the Homeowner, the Builder, the Warrant Insure and/or HBW…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. (TCO A) An alternative available when the seller is exposed to continued risks of ownership through return of the product is (Points : 6)…

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiff Wendling

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff Wendling, who was a farmer and stockman, met Defendant Puls, who was a cattle buyer in July 1973. The two got to talking and Wendling informed Puls that there was a possibility that he would have cattle for sale around mid August. On August 13th, Puls received a call from Wendling letting him know that he had cattle ready to be sold. The two later met, along with Puls’s financial assistance Watson and agreed on a sales price based on the weight of the cattle on August 16th. Puls left a deposit of 1,000 dollars with Wendling for the cattle. On the scheduled date for pick up, Puls requested an additional week for delivery of the cattle. Needless to say, after the week went by there was no sign of Puls. He failed to respond to any of phone calls or messages left by Wendling. When he was finally able to reach Puls on August 27th, he learned that Puls didn’t have a place to store the cattle. Since there were so many issues, Wendling asked Puls for an additional down payment, which was refused by Puls. Puls went on to suggest that maybe he should just sell his cattle to someone else. At that time, Wendling suggested to Puls that he provide him with a written release, which he just ignored. Wendling went on to seek legal advice and was advised to get a written release from Puls before engaging in another sale of the cattle. Wendling tried to reach Puls, but was unsuccessful; however he was able to reach Watson. He asked Watson if they both would meet him at his lawyers’ office, so that he could obtain a release from the contract in order…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CoAx and CableCo have entered into a binding written agreement for CableCo to buy 1,000 feet of coaxial cable for $3 per foot. However, CableCo is building a new warehouse, so they currently don’t have anywhere to store the cable. They have asked CoAx to store the cable in their warehouse until CableCo’s warehouse is completed in three months. CoAx agrees to do so. They store the cable in spools holding 10,000 feet of cable, which are considered finished goods ready to be shipped. They will not physically set aside the 1,000 feet of cable that CableCo ordered, but will denote the quantity as sold in their system so that it cannot be used to fill another order. They have determined that CableCo has assumed risk of ownership,…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Grant Madill worked in a company called Potter & Associates for several years. He started dating a coworker named Jane Barry, who he eventually married. However, in the company’s policy the company does not prohibit dating coworkers, but it does have a policy forbidding married couples from both being employed by the organization. Since Grant married Jane, he clearly breached and violated the company’s policy. The policy specifically states that, if two coworkers at Potter decide to marry, then the less senior of the two will have resign. Therefore under this policy, the management of Potter expected Grant to resign when he and Jane got married, as he had less seniority than Jane. Grant did not want and refused to resign, thereafter being…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharon would also be able to bring a claim of misrepresentation of the quality g of the goods. Under a of quality claim the seller misrepresented the quality of the good and the consumer relied on this misrepresentation to their determent, Here Dean misrepresented the quality of the boat to Sharon. He represented to her that the boat was ready to use and implied to her the boat was inspected by a mechanic by showing her her the mechanics 30 point checklist. Sandra relied on this misrepresentation to her detrment because she wanted a boat that was in good consition.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 11 Business law

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Signal Sets Company contracts to deliver one hundred 52-inch plasma high-definition television sets to a new retail customer, Tuner TV Store, on May 1, with payment to be made on delivery. Signal tenders delivery in its own truck. Tuner's manager notices that some of the cartons have scrape marks. Tuner's owner phones Signal's office and asks whether the sets might have been damaged as they were being loaded. Signal assures Tuner that the sets are in perfect condition. Tuner tenders Signal a check, which Signal refuses, claiming that the first delivery to new customers is always for cash. Tuner promises to pay the cash within two days. Signal leaves the sets with Tuner, which stores them in its warehouse pending its "Grand Opening Sale" on May 15. Two days later, Tuner's stocker opens some of the cartons and discovers that a number of the sets are damaged beyond ordinary repair. Signal claims Tuner has accepted the sets and is in breach by not paying on delivery. Will Signal succeed on these claims? Explain.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statute Of Frauds

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page

    Both “warranty” and “guarantee” have legal value, and can be enforced through a court of law, under their respective laws. For example, the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 protects consumers against unfair trade practices like making misleading representations about “guarantee” or “warranty”. However, given that guarantees can be ‘oral or written’ under Indian Contract Act, it becomes difficult to enforce an oral agreement of guarantee.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Grand Fabricating Co. and Good Corp. agreed orally that Good would custom manufacture a compressor for Grand at a price of $120,000. After Good completed the work at a cost of $90,000, Grand notified Good that the compressor was no longer needed. Good is holding the compressor and has requested payment from Grand. Good has been unable to resell the compressor for any price. Good incurred storage fees of $2,000. If Grand refuses to pay Good and Good sues Grand, the most Good will be entitled to recover is…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The statute of fraud is defined as, “a law that requires that certain contracts be in writing, and that those contracts be signed by the parties who are to be bound by the contract”. [1] The policy that underpins the Statue of Frauds was established during the reign of King Charles II through a statutory enactment requiring a written record for specified types of contracts. [2] These specified types of contracts could not be enforced unless a memorandum of it is written and signed by the party to be charged. [3] The basic rules include: 1. the stature does not require the entire contract to be written, but only a memorandum of it, 2. only the party who is to be charged, that is, against whom enforcement is sought, need to have signed it, and 3. The consequence of noncompliance is usually unenforceability, not invalidity. [4] This was to ensure that a person could not seek to enforce an obligation of the kind covered by the statute purely on the basis of unreliable and possibly perjured oral testimony, but would have to produce some adequate written record of the contract. [5] The writing can also help reduce the chance of any future litigation by giving the parties the opportunity to take a second look at the terms and conditions of their agreement before it becomes final. [6] Because of the advancement of communication through technology the adaptation of “writing” and “signature” has been required to take account of communication by other forms, particularly including electronic and media. [7]…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proper documentation – there were problems with maintaining proper trail documentation or with missing documentation which should have been monitored and entered into system to keep an easy track of instead of depending on filing papers.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Increased Use of Analytical Review- because of the risks to small business they can benefit more from analytical reviews.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    UETA, passed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) in 1999, effectively gives legally binding status to electronic documents and signatures. Nearly all states have adopted UETA or enacted their own nearly identical legislation surrounding in-state electronic transactions. In response to the interests of businesses and government agencies, Congress passed ESIGN in 2000 to ensure that the validity of electronic records and transactions cannot be denied solely due to their electronic form. ESIGN intentionally uses…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disputes arising from contracts entered into online concern the terms and assent to those terms.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sub: Corporate Law

    • 2401 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A ship-owner agreed to carry to cargo of sugar belonging to A from Constanza to Busrah. He knew that there was a sugar market in Busrah and that A was a sugar merchant, but did not know that he intended to sell the cargo, immediately on its arrival. Owning to Shipment’s default, the voyage was delayed and sugar fetched a lower price than it would have done had it arrived on time. A claimed compensation for the full loss suffered by him because of the delay. Give your decision. Explain Briefly?…

    • 2401 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics