How do narrative strategies of point of view/focalisation, reader positioning and closure work together to produce the class politics encoded in 45 & 47 Stella Street?
The story of 45 & 47 Stella Street and everything that happened (Honey, E 2000) is written from a first person narrative perspective. This is evident from page 5 of the book when the narrator, Henni introduces herself to the reader and does not from change from Henni to another narrator throughout the text. The reader sees the story through Henni’s point of view of the world around her. The implied reader would be aimed at children around the same age as Henni so the reader can relate to her. The author attempts to imply that Henni is a reliable narrator from the moment the reader is first introduced to Henni. There is a picture of a tall girl which is Henni and a statement in which Henni says ‘I’m the tallest girl in our school. I’m not the oldest or the cleverest or the prettiest or the funniest but I sure am the tallest which nobody can deny’ (Honey 2000, p.5). This honest statement encourages the reader to see Henni as reliable narrator. In the story Henni is frequently writing letters to God asking for his help with certain matters like when Old Aunt Lillie went to heaven and she asked God to give her a good spot (p.10). Usually most people associate someone who prays or writes notes to God as a reliable and trustworthy person. The fact that the story is seen through Henni’s eyes, thoughts and opinions the reader is positioned to agree with what is being described to them by Henni.
Class politics are introduced to the story when the Phonies arrive in Stella Street. The Phonies are disliked as soon as they arrive in Stella Street because of the renovations they make on Old Aunt Lillie’s house and the children of Stella Street make fun of the fact that the Phonies refurnish the house (p.13). Henni encourages the reader to make fun of the high class Phonies about the way they speak, because the Phonies use words such as ‘dinnah’ and ‘daaaarling’ (p.18). This shows the Phonies in a negative way enticing the audience to take Henni’s side or a middle class approach to the story. When the Phonies send a note from their lawyer to Frank’s family for a proposal of a new fence (p.22) they are once again looked at poorly. The Phonies are criticised for responding formally with a complaint of their next door neighbours. When the family receives the letter Rob says ‘And why didn’t they just say “Let’s talk about a new fence!” instead of coming out guns blazing with all this solicitor’s letter nonsense’ (p.23). This quote makes the Phonies look like unreasonable people.
Henni, Danielle, Zev, Frank and their friends and families are all portrayed as middle class people. All these people seem to agree that there is something strange about the high class Phonies and want to find a way to get them out of their street. Henni also makes fun of the lower class dog catcher Mr W.P. Burgess. She refers to Mr Burgess as ‘Hitler’ and accuses him of looking like a ‘garbo’ (p.43). Henni also describes Mr Burgess as having a ‘nasty temper’. This may imply that lower class people are angry or mean people.
Frank’s mother, Donna works for social services working with lower class families. Sometimes she brings home troubled kids which Henni refers to these kids as a ‘bit off the planet’ and ‘rent-a-kid’ (p.24-25). These comments could make the reader sympathize with the lower class but also see them as unstable people because they cannot always stay with their parents.
The Brown boys are also looked upon as lower class people and are considered as ‘trouble’ (p.72) by the residents of Stella Street. The Brown boys are also shown to be liars after they lie to the police about playing spotlight. This could result in the reader forming the opinion that lower class people are liars. Donna also tells the kids of Stella Street ‘Don’t bank on the Brown boys’. This brings up an issue of being able to trust people of a lower class and whether they are capable of doing the right thing.
The closure of the story is depicted as a happy ending with the high class Phonies leaving Stella Street and going to jail. This makes the residents of Stella Street so happy that they go out for expensive fish and chips. They also drink champagne and toast to ‘LIFE WITHOUT THE PHONIES’ (p.167). Another reason the story ends on a happy note is that the new neighbours that move in are friendly middle class people unlike the Phonies. The reader can assume the new neighbours are middle class because they fit in well in Stella Street and are instantly liked by the other residents. This is shown when the new girls turn up to Frank’s place and he invites them in.
The novel 45 & 47 Stella Street and everything that happened had an underlying agenda of class politics with a message that it is best to be in the middle class then it is to be in the high class or lower class of people.
REFERENCES
Honey E 2000, ’45 & 47 Stella Street and everything that happened’, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest
References: Honey E 2000, ’45 & 47 Stella Street and everything that happened’, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
J.B Priestley was born in Bradford, Yorkshire on 13th September 1894. He firm believer of socialism which is a political theory or system in which the means of production and distribution are controlled by the people therefore he disagrees firmly with capitalism. Priestley set his play in 1912 because the date symbolized an period when all was very unusual from the time he was writing. In 1912, inflexible class and gender restrictions seemed to guarantee that nothing would change. However by 1945 the majority of class and gender divisions had been infringed. Priestley wanted to make the most of these changes. The Inspector wants to teach the Birling Family to care about other and not only themselves and he wants to show that social status and wealth are not significant factors. One of Priestley’s major concerns was that even that the war has ended people were living in poverty and living depressed lives. I think that J.B Priestley is trying to tell people that they shouldn’t rejoice after the war because several people have been killed. Priestley shows that there shouldn’t be a division between people of different class. In 1912 the Birling family lead a comfortable life Birling is a prime example of a capitalist, J.B Priestley is keen to highlight the selfishness of him in the play. J.B Priestley wanted to highlight what was right and wrong in society as it is a morality play .In this essay I am going to investigate how J.B Priestley uses dramatic devices to intrigue the audience.…
- 820 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The protagonist lacks in all these three factors, making her stubborn, angry, and a know-it-all person. However, what she is not aware of is her family economic hardship neither the other kids. The innocence of the Protagonist is highly recognizable throughout the story, the taxi ride, the woman in a fur coat in the heat of summer, etc. The speaker has never seen someone in a fur coat during summer. She thinks is crazy, but that represents a symbol of wealth, something she was discovering through this lesson. Then they arrive at the toy store, and everyone is looking through the window amazed with the price tags. It took them a while to come inside the store, the kids know that they do not belong in there. Once inside, the speaker sees a clown, it is just $35 dollars really cheap compared to the other items in the store and pocket change for the rich folks. Going back to the slums in the train, the speaker starts to think a better use for that money, new bunk beds, food for her whole family, a trip to visit her grandfather, and even the rent and the piano bill. Through the process of analyzing, she said, referring to rich people: ” What kind of work they do and how they live and how come we ain't in on it?" Anger is flowing through her blood, and she questions herself why she cannot have a piece of the pie that represents the American wealth? Despite that other…
- 477 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Low class, middle class, and high class. Mayella is in a class that is lower than low class. She lives behind a dumpster where there is an old slave shelter. Nobody in the town wants to help her and her family because of how low her class is. The only person who wanted to help was Tom Robinson. He felt bad for her and helped her out. When Tom helped her out with things, people of the town thought of them as lower than the African-Americans. The yard that Mayella lives in is dirty. The only thing that is clean there is her red geraniums, they were Mayella’s red…
- 359 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Mansfield, projecting her middle-class upbringing, delineates the story of a privileged family receiving a doll house, its arrival tainted somewhat by the chemical odour it emits and the repetition of “smell of paint” foreshadowing its toxicity and the alienation it shall cause. The children show the doll house to all but the Kelveys, who are exile because of their lowly socio-economic status. Their desolation is elucidated through the aggregation of the various occupations of the townspeople, allowing the author to juxtapose the “judge’s children” to the “store-keeper’s children”, thereby establishing their position at the foot of the social ladder. While such exclusion is evident in “Feliks Skrzynecki” as the poet’s father is mocked by a clerk, the basis of the exclusion varies. While Skrzynecki is because of his cultural background, the Kelveys’ isolation stems from their financial and subsequent social shortcomings. Ultimately, the Kelveys embrace their position of being perennial outsiders and their acceptance of their identity intensifies the bond between them, as is depicted through the hyperbole, “went through life holding each other”. The Doll’s House thus opens our eyes to the difficulty of belonging when at a severe economic disadvantage, an issue mirrored in the…
- 998 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Although the woman from America and Queenie are both in a high social class, each of them treat less fortunate people with different amounts of respect. In “The Woman From America”, the woman from America tries her best to make good with what she has, and to adapt to her new environment. She exerts all of her energy to fit into her husband’s village by following the rules, and doing her fair share of work. As opposed to in “A&P”, where Queenie breaks the rules and then has the audacity to challenge them after the store manager, Lengel, explains them to her. Halfway into their argument “she remembers her place, a place from which the crowd that runs the A&P must look pretty crummy” (Updike 22). Instead of acknowledging that Lengel’s rules are law in the A&P, Queenie ignores him and is unwilling to adapt to the situation and environment that she has placed herself in. This shows that Queenie, unlike the woman from America, looks down on people that are ‘beneath her’, and is unwilling to change her ways to fit in with a different crowd.…
- 855 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The lack of disclosure between the working and upper-middle class makes the upper-middle class oblivious to the working class’s hard work effort. In the first paragraph of the passage, Ehrenreich conveys a tone of annoyance and sarcasm. When the maids arrive at the home, they are unable to get inside. Ehrenreich voices that her itchy pink rash, “Must be poison ivy picked up at [the] lockout”(86). This sentence immediately helps the reader feel Ehrenreich's pain, and carries out the irritated tone of the paragraph. Ehrenreich also expresses a mocking tone and her annoyance towards the mistreated working class through her word choice and diction. She explains that the owner of the cleaning service, Ted, “[blames the workers] for customers’ fecklessness”(86). She includes the word fecklessness to create a snobby image for the homeowners, acknowledging that they are oblivious to the maids agonizing work. Ehrenreich also compares the maid service to elementary school students. She illustrates how a day off from work for the maids was not “like a snow day for the grade schools crowd”, because Ted always finds a way to make the maids at fault. Ehrenreich also compares the maids to be, “like cat burglars” while they search for a point of entrance into the house (87). With the use of these similes, Ehrenreich shows her irritated and sarcastic tone. This paragraph reveals Ehrenreich's feeling of dissatisfaction with the gap between homeowner and worker, and how the working class is mistreated.…
- 788 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Helen on 86th street” by Wendi Kaufman is about a 12 year old girl who tries out for a lead part in her school play. The play was about the Trojan War and when results rolled around she had gotten a smaller part, and was extremely jealous of Helen who made the main role. Vita was going to play inside the horse with a really cute boy. While Vita was jealous of Helen, Helen was jealous of Vita because the cute boy accompanying Vita during the play was the boy she had a major crush on. Throughout the play Vita was comparing her life to the one her father was living. Her dad left them unexpectedly when she was a little girl, and they still to this day don’t know where he is in the world. Vita says her dad is on an Odyssey and hopes one day he will return home. Over the years she has been writing him letters and putting them in a shoe box tied shut in her closet. She does this because it allows her to put her true thoughts about her dad on paper and pretend she is really close with her dad and hopefully nobody will ever see them.…
- 885 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
But that does not take away from the story. The 1960’s basic town setting helps the story unfold. In the 1960’s women were not treated as equally as men. They had less power than the men. Arnold Friend proves this when he expects Connie to listen to him when he tells her what to do. Just like the other women in the 1960’s Connie did not want to listen to the men. The smaller town setting made it easier for Arnold friend to find Connie and know exactly what she was doing, along with her family as well. Along with the setting, the third person limited omniscient point of view directs the reader to feel sympathy for Connie. The point of view allows the reader to see Arnold Friend and the situations from Connie’s perspective. If the story was told in a different point of view the reader may get a complete contrasting outcome opinion. The setting and the point of view play together to pus…
- 1247 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
O'Connor still felt proud to be who she was. By comparison, Mrs. Turpin in "…
- 1777 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Lenox Avenue is a crucial street in Harlem, which to the extent the geology of New York is North, or uptown. We might inquire as to why Hughes has formed "down on Lenox Avenue" rather than "up on Lenox Avenue." Let's think, then, about the character of the speaker of the ditty. Since Harlem was home basically to African Americans and the parts of New York City south of Harlem (suggested as "downtown") were populated generally by whites, if the speaker were to see Lenox Avenue as "up" from his place of beginning stage, we might expect that he is white. In the midst of the 20s and 30s, creations by African-Americans about dim character and culture increased. This especially profitable time of expansive and awesome dynamic creation is implied…
- 578 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Set in a small rural town in the 1950’s, Rosalie Ham, the author of the ‘Dressmaker,’ has written the novel in such a way that presents the audience with an exquisitely detailed portrayal of the characters. She critiques the malicious behaviours of many of the townspeople’s values highlighted within the wheat-belt community. Ham challenges the reader to view their ideas and morals through her empathetic portrayal as their actions are understood, however the hypocrisy and bigotry that are exhibited by significant characters depict their idiosyncrasies through Ham’s comedic portrayal.…
- 1025 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Mary, a member of the younger generation and like every other resident of Garden Place, "did not talk to many old people any more" and owned a house that looked like the one beside and across it. Mary, knowing both sides, and has heard both Mrs. Fullerton and her neighbors' stories, is in a dilemma. She sacrifices being the topic of gossip at the next coffee party and asserts her position as one who does not care how things look and stands up for Mrs. Fullerton. Mary differs from every other resident of Garden Place by showing vulnerability while her discrete refusal to conform with the others imperceptibly bridges the division between the two…
- 328 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
also gives way to understanding how objective reality is conveyed in this story on a social level. In…
- 250 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Conformity is an important theme in the suburban city in which Edward Scissorhands is set, as it greatly influences the behavior of the residents and is ultimately the deciding factor in the plot. This theme is first conveyed in the story that the grandmother is telling the child, which unfolds with Peg Boggs selling Avon products in the neighborhood that is soon to be Edward’s home. She goes from door to door of each cookie cutter house, and much like her inevitably pleasant manner, the response of each woman at every house remains the same. Because of this unchanging pattern in which no one wants to buy Peg’s products, she first encounters Edward within the Gothic style mansion on the hill. This is the first occasion in which conformity, and the behavior that follows in suit of it, is the cause of an important event within the plot. Immediately after this, conformity comes into play from the moment Edward arrives in the city. As he and Peg make their way to the Boggs’ home, the constantly gossiping women of the city are met with their newest topic of discussion—Edward Scissorhands himself. They gather at the street corner to share their speculations regarding Edward’s identity and the reasons for his presence. This becomes a regular and highly symbolic occurrence after his arrival. It epitomizes the general attitude of the people of the city. They do not think as individuals, nor do they seem to be capable of even…
- 1312 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
From early on in the play Willy Russell depicts the difference in class through the contrast of Rita and Frank. Rita’s language can been seen as informal, loose and lots of swearing, typical images of a working class upbringing juxtaposed to the precise and formal educated language used by Frank. Rita longs to enter the world of education and escape her working class origins when she realises she is “slightly out of step” therefore she sees the Open University as a way of moving into a different world where she has “choice”. Rita asks Frank “God what’s it like to be free?” but this question is seen as ironic, because Frank is not free and is restricted by his poky office and his unsatisfying job. The office however, is a place where Rita one day wishes to move into. She is unaware and naive that the change she desires is superficial. This is contradicts what she says in scene 1; “But if you try to change y’ have to do it from the inside, don't y’?”. Rita becomes an obstacle for her self, she limits her thinking abilities and her thoughts become influenced by the those thoughts around her. For example Trish and Tyson are important for her movement into the world as she gains self confidence however she begins to lose her ‘rosy view’ of the world and starts to see them more realistically after Trish tries to take her own life. This is an eye…
- 883 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays