We all have different viewpoints when it comes to Embryonic Stem Cell Therapy. Majority of the individuals believes that it violates the sanctity of life because they consider the act of destroying a human blastocyst is equal to killing a human being.
Embryos are considered humans from the moment of the union of the gametes; hence, it can be relayed as the weakest members of society. It is morally wrong to exploit the weak merely because some benefit can be derived from it.
According to Bible: Matthew 22:37-40, we have to love our neighbours as we love ourselves. Therefore, we should have the respect for the right to life of every innocent person: from conception to natural death. Although we know that embryo is only a Human Blastocyst and still isn’t able to live outside the womb, it still possesses inestimable worth.
I support and encourage Stem Cell Therapy that does not involve or require the destruction of human embryos. Embryonic stem cell research destroys young human life. It is never morally or ethically justified to kill one human in order to benefit another.
I believe life is sacred. We should not involve any harm to innocent human beings at any stage of development. I morally support the “Miracle Cure” thru use of stem cells taken from adult tissues and umbilical cords instead of embryos.
References: http://www.stemcellsfreak.com/p/stem-cell-controversy.html http://www.christian.org.uk/briefingpapers/embryoexperiments.htm
INFORMED CONSENT
Informed Consent follows from the principle of patient autonomy, and consent is required before you may provide care. "No medical intervention done for any purpose - whether diagnostic, investigational, cosmetic, palliative, or therapeutic - should take place unless the patient has consented to it". Informed consent also serves as a significant protection against possible litigation.
According to the article of PROBE Stem Cell Therapy, Rep. Paulino 'Doy' Leachon,