Strategic A Federal Plan With The Jewish Community: Case Study

Strategic plan has been presented as a way to set the direction of the organization. Difference between corporate and non-profit society organizations raises questions whether strategic planning can help both of it. This article presents a case study of strategic a federal plan with the Jewish community. Religious differences led to conflict over policies and procedures. However, planning the political and psychological interest in the community as one or unite. As a result, they follow the consensus procedures that allow them to avoid checks difference, but leads to the result that the majority do not like. Strategic planning cannot escape dealing with the social, cultural, and psychological differences and conflicts regarding them.
The Associated,
The confusion between programs and outcomes can be attributed to inexperience with education, but knowledgeable staff members do not push for clarity. Probably people avoid talking about what education should do because they assume differences are irreconcilable, and talking specifically seems not only futile, but dangerous. The chair and others talk about whether there is consensus on certain issues, whether, in effect, the staff is authorized to draft Later, Stein and a staff member agree they don’t hear consensus on basic issues, but the staff is authorized to fill out the
Thus the history of strategic planning for Jewish education shows four years in which the majority could neither come to agreement with the minority nor defeat them. Strategic planning was an effort to subsume the politics of budgetary interests under agreed-on principles and priorities. Instead, political and psychological interests in unanimity led the non-Orthodox majority to move their conflicts with the largely Orthodox minority behind the scenes to a realm of interest-group politics. While the rhetoric of strategic planning implies rationality, the reality of frightening differences and unacknowledged emotions drives politics. When even small differences arouse anxiety, it is easier to attack right-wing Orthodox, civil Jews, unaffiliated, or intermarried as dangers to the community than it is to grapple with a mixture of similarities and