Which side of the Epidemiologic Triangle do you recommend be broken and why? Explain you answer in detail and include you thought process that led you to you decision. I recommend that we take out the “Agent” side of the Epidemiologic Triangle because that’s where the process all starts. I don’t recommend taking out the “Host” or “Environment” side and that’s because if you take out the “Host” side of the triangle you would be taking out humans and animals and whatever other species are capable of carrying the disease. By taking out that side you would practically be killing people and you can’t just go around and exterminate people because people are the most important thing in a society and if you do that, you would create chaos and people would be furious with you killing their family member or anyone they know. If you were to take out the “Environment” side of the triangle because if you did you would have to pretty much burn everything that any infected person
Which side of the Epidemiologic Triangle do you recommend be broken and why? Explain you answer in detail and include you thought process that led you to you decision. I recommend that we take out the “Agent” side of the Epidemiologic Triangle because that’s where the process all starts. I don’t recommend taking out the “Host” or “Environment” side and that’s because if you take out the “Host” side of the triangle you would be taking out humans and animals and whatever other species are capable of carrying the disease. By taking out that side you would practically be killing people and you can’t just go around and exterminate people because people are the most important thing in a society and if you do that, you would create chaos and people would be furious with you killing their family member or anyone they know. If you were to take out the “Environment” side of the triangle because if you did you would have to pretty much burn everything that any infected person