Preview

Strict Liability Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
577 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strict Liability Case Study
Strict Liability
Amanda Self
BA265 Business Law II
Abstract
While shopping at Carl’s Hardware Store he was injured by a nail gun that Dan, an employee was using. When he noticed that the nail gun was assembled improperly he decided to sue the manufacture of the product, Eagle Tools Inc. Under strict liability, the manufacture has a liability to make sure that all the products that they sell are in working and safe conditions. While this product fits the requirements that strict liability covers the courts will award Bob his claim.

Strict Liability
Bob was shopping at Carl’s Hardware Store when he was injured in the leg with a nail gun that was being used by Dan, an employee. When Bob examined the nail gun, he noticed that it was assembled improperly. He then Sued Eagle Tools Inc. for strict liability, Bob has a claim against the company for the manufacturing of the nail gun since they are liable to be sure that all products that they sell are in working and safe conditions.
…show more content…
(Bygrave, W.D. & Zacharakis, A. 2014). This carries through companies who design a products or services for others. In order to have a claim against a company you would need to make sure that certain requirements are there. These are: 1. the defendant needs to sell a defective product rather than the product becoming defective after the sell. 2. The defendant has to be engaged in selling that product. 3. In most states the product has to be dangerous due to the defective condition. 4. The plaintiff has to have physical harm to property or to self by the use of the product. 5. The cause of the harm must be the result of the defective condition. 6. The goods could not have been changed from the time the product was sold to the time that the injury

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Culpepper V. Weihrauch KG

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On August 12, 1996, Plaintiff, Ann Culpepper, filled action against defendant, Hermann Weihrauch KG, ETC., seeking damages for injuries she sustained after an accidental shooting from the gun she owned that was manufactured by Weihrauch. Ann Culpepper imposed liability on Weihrauch under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine of 1979. This doctrine provides liability “if a company manufactured, designed or sold a defective product, which by unreasonably unsafe conditions, injured someone or damaged their property when such product, unaltered, was put to its intended use.”…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kuehn V. Pub Zone Summary

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    PL sues D in negligence for damages from injuries suffered caused by the D’s failure of meeting the duty of exercising reasonable care to protect PL, a business patron.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A dealer sold a new car to Raymond Smith. The sales contract contained language expressly disclaiming liability for personal injuries caused as a result of defects in the car and limiting the remedy for breach of warranty to repair or replacement of the defective part. One month after purchasing the auto, Smith was seriously injured when the car veered off the road and into a ditch as a result of a defect in the steering mechanism of the car.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis: Samantha is not able to prove that the grocery store had any knowledge of the hazardous substance on the floor; therefore, the grocery store was not negligent in its duty to the customer and cannot be held liable for Samantha’s injuries.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 2 for ACC 440

    • 1728 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Jason, Inc. manufactures chain saws. Margie is injured while using a chain saw manufactured by Jason, Inc. and sues the company for product liability based on negligence. To win, Margie must show that…

    • 1728 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "In determining whether liability exists under a duty-risk analysis, a plaintiff must prove that the conduct in question was the cause-in-fact of the resulting harm, that [the] defendant owed a duty to [the] plaintiff which [the] defendant breached and that the risk of harm was within the scope of protection afforded by the duty breached." The court used a different set of principles to determine DOTD’s liability. “The plaintiff bears the burden of showing that: (1) the DOTD had custody of the thing that caused the plaintiff's injuries or damages; (2) the thing was defective because it had a condition that created an unreasonable risk of harm; (3) the DOTD had actual or constructive knowledge of the defect and did not take corrective measures within a reasonable time; and (4) the defect in the thing was a cause-in-fact of the plaintiff's…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samantha Smith Case

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In our case Samantha Smith had an accident in a retail store where she slipped on shampoo that had leaked from the bottle and suffered a broken hip. In her suite against the store Samantha claims the store is at fault; however, the store claims that Samantha failed to exercise due care while shopping and that she is partially to blame for the accident. The three articles below pertain to our case in one way or another.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Class V.: Case Study

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (#4-7) According to the case, the plaintiff should not be held as semi liable for his injuries while attending the Daytona International Speedway. My client should receive a decision in his favor because NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway were and are negligent in how races are conducted, the design of the speedway, and the lack of safety barriers to protect spectators, such as my client, from being severely injured during an event. There were several issues that NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway are responsible for that resulted in the traumatic injury my client sustained. According to my client the numerous problems that resulted in the plaintiff’s injuries are:…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aarons V. Peterson

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, he took no measures to secure the tools either by fastening a lock or relocating the toolbox to a less accessible location. His failure to protect the children from the potential harm arising from their use of the tools is a breach of his duty owed to the plaintiff. Causation - The defendant’s son was able to obtain dangerous instruments, a hammer and nail, which were housed within an accessible toolbox. While using the hammer to make a blow to a nail, the nail flew out from the wood and stuck the neighbor. Actual Injury - The nail strike chipped the neighbor’s front teeth, bloodied his nose, and gashed his cheek.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    California Space Heaters

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Liability lawsuits were probable should there be injuries or adverse health consequences. Strict liability in tort would in all likelihood be the applicable liability standard, so the company could be held liable even if an injury were due to foreseeable misuse by a consumer. Total costs would include the cost of liability insurance, legal and court costs, and the time of management required by the cases. Insurance costs could be reduced by adding safety features.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although a firm can assure that a product is safe through design, a firm cannot guarantee complete product safety to the consumer. For example, Conair, a producer of electric hair dryers, includes illustrated tags warning the user not to use the product near water. However, it is possible that a product goes out the door with bad wiring and causes an electric shock to the user. A firm can and should take every precaution and effort to ensure product safety from design through production to consumer, and should be prepared to be liable for product malfunctions. With large companies, like Ford and Firestone, it can be difficult to have complete visibility of production and monitor every product going out the door for safety issues. However, user error does not make product safety invalid. For example, a can of hairspray is safe to use as long as it is not near open flames and/or punctured. However, should a user disregard product safety warnings, the product can become unsafe and potentially deadly. Because of the always-present possibility for user error or a lack of quality or safety assurance on the assembly line, a firm cannot fully guarantee complete product safety.…

    • 974 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Case

    • 5575 Words
    • 23 Pages

    PUSEY, EXR., APPELLANT, v. BATOR ET AL.; GREIF BROTHERS CORPORATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Pusey v. Bator (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 275.] Torts — Wrongful death — Employer hires independent contractor to provide armed security guards to protect property — Inherently dangerous work exception — If someone is injured by weapon as a result of a guard’s negligence, employer is vicariously liable even though guard responsible is an employee of the independent contractor. (No. 00-1787 — Submitted October 30, 2001 — Decided February 27, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, No. 98 C.A. 55. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT When an employer hires an independent contractor to provide armed security guards to protect property, the inherently-dangerous-work exception is triggered such that if someone is injured by the weapon as a result of a guard’s negligence, the employer is vicariously liable even though the guard responsible is an employee of the independent contractor. __________________ DOUGLAS, J. At all times relevant herein, defendant-appellee, Greif…

    • 5575 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One very important issue in this case and many civil lawsuits is negligence. Negligence is when there is a failure to use reasonable care which results in injury or damage to another. It also asks who is responsible for one’s injury. In this case, Mrs. McKoy claims her injuries were caused by T & J’s negligent behavior. In order to prove negligence, T & J must be guilty of five elements: duty of due care, breach, factual cause, proximate cause, and damages.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In chapter six, Nomi creates a very vivid memory of watching two black Mennonite dresses “flying around like crazy birds way up in the sky”. As she watched them fly all the way to her grandmother’s yard where she was, she remained fascinated, calling that, “even the best thing that ever happened to her.” She then said goodbye to the fallen dress when the spectacular show ended, like a little child who didn’t know the difference between a dress and a person. Shortly after recalling that memory, she asks Travis to stop by her grandma’s place so she can search for the dress.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays