Preview

Strip Searches in Schools

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2010 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strip Searches in Schools
Donovan Brown
Professor Stumpf
Criminal Justice 205
29 November 2012
The Fourth Amendment: Does it really protect “Everyone”? The Fourth Amendment is an essential part of the United States Constitution. It grants all United States citizens the right to not have illegal searches and seizures brought against them. With this being said, the most recent debate of the Fourth Amendment has occurred in the United States Public School Systems. Many kids and adults feel that students should have the same rights under the Constitution when attending school as they do when they are out. However, many school officials believe that to keep schools safe, it is essential to bend the rules a little bit. This paper will discuss the debate that is raging in schools, look at recent cases involving the Fourth Amendment and schools, and give my personal view on the Fourth Amendment in schools. The debate that is currently raging in public schools, is whether or not kids in public schools, can be strip searched or not. This has many parents up in arms, because they feel like this violates their children’s safety, as well as, their Fourth Amendment rights. The issue of the Fourth Amendment in schools was never really an issue, until the shooting at Columbine High School in April of 1999. This massacre really put an emphasis on security in schools. With this being said, many schools started to gear towards random locker searches and back pack searches. They never took it to the extreme of strip searches. However, with the recent school shooting at Virginia Tech and with the most recent massacre in Aurora, Colorado, many schools have stepped up their security even more. School officials are scared of having a massacre at their school. So by being over protective, they believe they can prevent one from happening. The debate has begun to surface and be more recognized because parents believe that strip searches are too far. When it comes to their children, most


Cited: Bracy, Nicole L. "Circumventing the Law: Students ' Rights in Schools With Police." N.p., May 2010. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. Donahoe, Diana R. "Strip Searches of Students: Addressing the Undressing of Children in Schools and Redressing the Fourth Amendment Violations." N.p., Spring 2012. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. <http://law.missouri.edu/lawreview/docs/75-4/Donahoe.pdf>. Feierman, Jessica R., and Riya S. Shah. "Protecting Personhood: Legal Strategies to Combat the Use of Strip Searches on Youth in Detention." N.p., Apr. 2010. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. Jarret, Laura. "EXCESSIVELY INTRUSIVE IN LIGHT OF AGE OR SEX?: AN ANALYSIS OF SAFFORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1 V. REDDING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR STRIP SEARCHES IN SCHOOLS." N.p., June 2010. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. <http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlg/vol331/403-414.pdf>. Parker, Dennis. "Discipline in Schools After Safford Unified School District #1 v. Redding." N.p., Summer 2009/2010. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. <http://www.nyls.edu/user_files/1/3/4/17/49/1001/Parker%2054.4.pdf>.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    T. L. O. Podcast: Case Study
    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages

    T. L. O. Podcast: Case Study

    A teacher found two girls smoking in the bathroom in a school located in New Jersey. Upon arrival to the principal’s office for disciplinary actions, one of the girls admitted to smoking, while the other (whose initials are T.L.O.) denied any wrongdoing. The principal ended up searching the girl’s purse which contained evidence to prove she was smoking in the bathroom along with marijuana paraphernalia. She eventually admitted to using this paraphernalia for selling marijuana in school. Using the evidence found within the purse and the confession, she was charged and taken into juvenile court where she was eventually sentenced to a year’s probation. T.L.O argued that her 4th amendment rights had been violated…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tyler Chase Harper V Poway Unified School Case Summary
    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tyler Chase Harper V Poway Unified School Case Summary

    Tyler Chase Harper, a high school sophomore, was sent to the principal’s office for violating the dress code. He was wearing a T-shirt which contained statements that disparaged the homosexual community. Chase filed suit in federal court claiming that the school violated his First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion, as well as rights protected by the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses under the federal Constitution and the California Civil Code.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tinker V Des Moines Case Study
    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tinker V Des Moines Case Study

    Although students do not lose their rights as they walk through the school gates, their rights are restricted for the safety of others. The court case of Tinker v. Des Moines argues the same issue of the rights of students while on school grounds. “Because the appearance of the armbands distracted students from their work, they detracted from the ability of the school officials to perform their duties, so the school district was well within its rights to discipline the students” (OYEZ). As the armbands distracted students, the inappropriate photos of Suzie distracted upperclassmen from their educational work, which also put Suzie in an uncomfortable position depriving herself the ability to focus 100% on school work. Therefore, the principal was taking away a distraction to discipline the students which can be compared to the case of Tinker v. Des…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser
    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bethel V Fraser

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tinker Vs Des Moines Case Study
    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tinker Vs Des Moines Case Study

    T.L.O. is a case that argued the right to privacy rights at school. The result of this case was that students belongings can be searched but not for no good reason. Furthermore, the case started when a fourteen year old student at Piscataway High School in New Jersey was caught smoking in a bathroom by a teacher. Once the student was caught her purse was then searched by the teacher. Found in the purse was a pack of cigarettes, rolling papers, and a small amount of marijuana. Because of the belongings discovered by the teacher, police were called in and the fourteen year old student openly admitted to selling drugs on school property. Furthermore, during her trial she was found guilty and was put on probation. However, fourteen year old, Terry argued that the search of her purse was a violation of the fourth amendment, “unreasonable searches and seizures.” This case is a great example of a landmark case because it started the beginning of future decisions regarding searches and seizures at…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    T. L. O Vs New Jersey Case Study
    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    T. L. O Vs New Jersey Case Study

    The Fourth Amendment states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”. But, does this Amendment apply to students in the public school systems?…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mapp v Ohio
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mapp v Ohio

    ii. On May 23, 1957, police officers in Cleveland, Ohio believed that a suspect in a bombing, as well as some illegal gambling equipment, might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp. Officers went to the home and asked for permission to enter, but Mapp refused them without a search warrant. Three hours later, the two returned with several other officers. Showing off a piece of paper, they broke in the door. Mapp asked to see the “warrant” and took it from an officer, putting it in her dress. The officers struggled to take it away from Mapp and snatched the piece of paper away from her. They then handcuffed her. The 4th Amendment protection against “unreasonable searches and seizures” and the “nationalization” of the Bill of Rights under the 14th Amendment was questioned before the Court. The illegal search in Mapp’s home and whether the evidence was admissible was challenged by many.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hu1440: Rhetoric In Contemporary Culture
    • 2530 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Hu1440: Rhetoric In Contemporary Culture

    Our forefathers with great fortitude put together a document that would be forever known as the constitution. This document addressed the rights of the citizens of the newly formed states. One amendment has been a focal point of discussion in recent weeks with the leakage of NSA protocol. The fourth amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place…

    • 2530 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Minersville School District V. Gobitis Case
    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Minersville School District V. Gobitis Case

    At times in schools, there could be disagreements and disputes between the decisions of government and the rights of individuals. Students attend school in order to become well-educated young adults. The schoolteacher’s main objective is to make sure that students are receiving the maximum amount of learning to prepare them for future endeavors. Schools educate students on citizenship and what it means to live in a democracy. Public schools are under the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, which gives citizens protection of their individual liberties from governmental interference. Public school officials must obey the demands of the Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in the 1943 case West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment Case Study
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fourth Amendment Case Study

    The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the request to suppress evidence. The New Jersey Supreme Court then reversed the decision and ruled that the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment applies to the searches and seizures made by school officials. The case then went to the United States Supreme Court. The first thing the U.S Supreme Court did was ordered to rehear the argument about the question of whether the assistant principal violated the Fourth Amendment in T.L.O’s case. After rehearing the argument the court in a 6-3 decision written by Justice Byron R. White ruled that the search of T.L.O’s purse was reasonable under the circumstances. They stated that even though the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizure also applied to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable searches of students with proper authority and probable…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Search And Seizure Research Paper
    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Search And Seizure Research Paper

    • a search of a student by a teacher or other school official will be "justifie…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Locker Searches In Schools
    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Locker Searches In Schools

    Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should Student's Fourth Amendment Rights Be Allowed In Schools Essay
    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should Student's Fourth Amendment Rights Be Allowed In Schools Essay

    One reason student's Fourth Amendment rights shouldn't be limited is because it violates their privacy. Someone shouldn't be able to walk up to a student and search their property. Authority can search people without their consent now. Students carry personal items in their bags or in their locker and warrant should be needed in order to search their property. In 1980, a teacher found two girls smoking in the restroom. T.L.O., one of the girls, denied smoking. The assistant principal demanded to…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule
    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule

    The Fourth amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. The interpretation and execution of the Fourth amendment in the courtroom however, is decided by the Supreme Court in an attempt to find a fair balance between individual and community interests. The exclusionary rule for example, is a Supreme Court precedent that holds police departments responsible for seizing incriminating information according to constitutional specifications of due process, or the information will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial. The question that arises in turn, is whether the exclusionary rule has handcuffed the abilities to effectively protect the community by the police, or if it has actually resulted in a positive police reform which needs to be expanded upon.…

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On The Fourth Amendment
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On The Fourth Amendment

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics