Preview

Strong National Government vs. Strong State Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
614 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strong National Government vs. Strong State Government
In Pyo Hong
February 19, 2013
6th Period
Persuasive Essay #3
Topic: Strong central government or Strong state government?

Does a strong federal government really benefit us, the people, as much as people say it does? A strong federal government compared to a strong local or state government is one of the major topics out there. Are you for a strong central government? A government where one man has the authority to wage wars? In reality studies show that a strong local government benefits the people more than officials would like you to know. In the end, it really doesn’t matter, but in reality, every power that the state government has the federal government has it and vice versa.

Strong state governments are great because any concern that is brought up in a small meeting is usually immediately taken into consideration. Because not every state require the same thing, have same values, and populations, local governments benefit in that they are able to set new laws that they will benefit from, whereas if it was implemented as a nation, some states may have problems with this new law. If a strong state government were implemented, state governments would be allowed to create new laws. Creating new laws take a very long time. This is because it has to go through many tiring and tedious processes. If state governments had the authority to implement laws, they would be able to implement laws almost immediately without having to get the consent of the federal government.

State governments can listen to their citizens better than a federal government where one voice is hard to be heard. Usually whenever something needs to be heard, but isn’t heard, a poll is taken to judge how important the given issue is. If a strong state government is implemented, these issues will almost immediately be taken care of. With a strong state government people will be able to decide the kind of lives they want t olive. Whether it be rights to bear arms or the making the legal
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Analysis
    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Analysis

    In politics everyone has a different opinion and it seems as if they never come to a compromise. This issue has been going on for many years now. As early as when this nation was first being built. Throughout history there have been times when the government has been at conflict. Many of these conflicts include the question as to who has more power and who should. If the states should or the national government. Two important cases in the past that have helped answer these questions are McCulloch vs. Maryland and Gibbons vs. Ogden. Both cases present conflicts that brought among state courts, which later end up being appealed in the Supreme Court and rule differently twice. Both cases ruling clear show a clear example as how the national government has a supremacy over the state government.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did The Constitution Divide The Powers Between Federal And Local Government
    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The Constitution Divide The Powers Between Federal And Local Government

    Federalism breaks down what National , State and local governments can and cannot do. Like the national government and only the National government has the power to tax,make treaties,coin money,establish post offices,raise a military,declare war,admit new states,build dams,interstate highways,Fund…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay
    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay

    First, Federalism helps guard against tyranny because it lets both governments control each other, it prevents state governments from attacking other states, and it separates powers.“In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments” (Federalist Paper 51, Doc A). This is saying that the state government and the federal government share power and have different abilities. The two governments can act as checks on each other and the different things that they can do balances the power out so there cannot be tyranny. Not allowing states from having their own military prevents tyranny because if…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Role Did The Great Compromises Play In Ensuring The Continuity Of The Constitutional Republic
    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Role Did The Great Compromises Play In Ensuring The Continuity Of The Constitutional Republic

    The Constitution gives certain powers to the federal government, such as regulating interstate commerce and national defense, while reserving other powers to the states, such as education and licensing. This division of powers allows for a balance between national unity and state autonomy, ensuring that both levels of government can operate efficiently while maintaining their respective authorities. The Federal System helps prevent tyranny by spreading power across different levels of government and allowing for diverse policies to address the needs of various…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny
    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

    The federal government has powers that are more general and apply to the country as a whole, while the state government has powers specific to their area. According to Madison in Federalist Paper #51 written in 1788, federalism guards against tyranny because, “The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Document A) They are able to control their separate areas of government while still controlling the power of the other, ensuring that the other does not accumulate too much power and turn the country into a…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Problems with the Articles of Confederation that were addressed by the Constitution and the importance of the issue of power centralization in American politics today
    • 1568 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Problems with the Articles of Confederation that were addressed by the Constitution and the importance of the issue of power centralization in American politics today

    Since the birth of the United States, the issue over how strong the national government should be has always been a controversial one. While some believe that decentralization will inevitably lead to chaos, others contend that a powerful central government will inevitably become a tyranny. Although the United States would wholeheartedly embrace the idea of a loose alliance of independent states at first, the many glaring problems that the nation faced under the Articles of Confederation would quickly change the minds of many Americans. Indeed, the nation 's confederal system of government was eventually rejected and replaced by federalism, a political philosophy that calls for a sharing of power between the national government and the smaller state and local governments. But how should this power be shared? Who should have the final say in the event of a dispute? As they have throughout history, these questions continue to divide Americans to this day. In this essay, three of the problems that the Constitution solved will be described in detail and the modern issue of the rights of the disabled will be used as an example of a disagreement between national authorities who are interested in fulfilling the needs of the entire country and state authorities who do not want the central government to undermine their right to address regional problems on their own.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism

    We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution In 1789: A Historical Analysis
    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Constitution In 1789: A Historical Analysis

    The government of the country provides the foundation that the country can build on. Even when there are problems the country can get through the problems because of the strong foundation. “One of the first things expected from any government is the creation of a system of laws that allows individuals to abide by a common set of principles” (Sabato 13). The government is needed to create rules that will keep the nation in order while being fair to everyone. The government is also in charge of insuring domestic tranquility and also “provide for the defense of its citizens against threats of foreign aggression” (Sabato 7). In times of crisis the government takes the measures needed to contain any threat whether it is terrorism or even a local robbery. The American government also provides citizens with a wide range of liberties and also help the country by promoting the general welfare. Without a government the country cannot operate efficiently and will not be able to sustain itself because it does not have a foundation. Earlier when America was under the Articles of Confederation, it was difficult to deal with problems because the Articles gave all the powers to the states. One of the problems that America faced was when the states imposed tariffs on each other and this affected domestic trade between states. This problem was fixed when the Constitution was introduced because now the federal government had a stronger foundation and also had strict trading laws. Therefore, the strength of the government of a country shows how efficient the country is and without a strong government many of the problems will go unsolved causing that nation to fall apart. A person that had a lot of influence in the foundation of the United States government was John Locke. Locke had many philosophies which were included in the Constitution and one of them was…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    National Supremacy Clause
    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page

    National Supremacy Clause

    The heart of the constitution is the National Supremacy Clause, which states that the constitution and federal laws are the "supreme Law of the Land," meaning it is superior to the law of the states. I personally do not think that the federal laws should always supersede state laws, but there can be times in which the federal government wants the entire country on the same page and they can use their power to do so. The federal government should create laws that effects, and sometimes benefits the country as a whole. The states, on the other hand, should create laws that are unique to the people living in them that do not interfere with the laws set by the federal government.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution Essay
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution Essay

    Some states would not abide by all of the federal government laws that where set or make their own laws that interfered with ones that were made. The Public Administration Quarterly said “The constitutions provided for varying degrees of decentralization. Nome, however, were as decentralized as the national government under the Articles. In all states, there was an executive in some form and in New York, Massachusetts, and Hew Hampshire he was elected by the people at large. Other states, however, provided for an executive chosen by a legislature or legislatively appointed body. In most states, the executive was essentially part of the legislature.” The US Constitution divides power between the Federal government and state governments. Giving certain power to the federal government to keep the country in stability to grow in the future like declare war on another country or treaties so the entire country stays on one side of the decision. When the federal government makes a law, the states have to follow it and change any laws that has conflict with it to fit within the parameters of the law. The States have reserved powers with are specifically for the states to regulate. This was the tenth amendment to the constitution and has similar tis to the Articles of…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalism: Increase In Federal Mandates
    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalism: Increase In Federal Mandates

    Over the last twenty-five years, federalism has transformed due to the increase in federal mandates on state and local governments. Federalism refers to a political system in which there are local units of government, as well as a national government, that can make final decisions with respect to at least some governmental activities, and whose existence is protected. When the Framers devised this political system their goal was to protect personal liberty and create a separation of powers. Over the years, federalism 's goal of decentralization evolved giving states more leeway. Mandates, however, have in a way, increased federal power, imposing requirements and/or conditions for obtaining federal grants. These mandates provided federal restrictions on states ' economic actions and have served the former purpose of protecting personal liberties because they usually concern civil rights and environmental protection. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, for example, shows how federalism has changed and how mandates have augmented the regulation of state and local governments ' actions.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq
    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    It may not sound very American to say, but the constitution has it’s flaws. The checks and balances of the federal government are only as strong as the integrity of the officials in the three branches. A group with similar ideas can take over all three and make deals amongst themselves. The state governments need more power to keep a check on the National government.Another issue with a strong centra government is that people in different states have vastly different beleifs and ideologies, and many of them even if held by an entire state, may not make it to the federal government. Richard Henry Lee said “In this congressional legislature, a bare majority of votes can enact commercial laws; so that the representatives of the seven Northern States, as they will have a majority, can, by law, create the most oppressive monopoly upon the five Southern States, whose circumstances and productions are essentially different from those of theirs, although not a single man of these voters are the representatives of, or amenable to, the people of the Southern States.“ And that was just with differences in opinion between the limited number of states that existed them. Now, with 50 states and an ever rising population, there are more differences than ever. A stronger state government would result in more diversity between states, laws more fitting to the beliefs of individual states opinion. Then the small federal government would make sure that these…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    U.S. Government
    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S. Government

    Our government is passed on federalism. Which means a government that shared its power between national, state and local governments. Our founding fathers wanted nothing to do with a centralized government and created the exact opposite, the federal government.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalism and Medical Marijuana
    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalism and Medical Marijuana

    With Federalism does anyone really know who is in charge? Sure it allows the state to have its own government and rules but the Federal Government can deny the states decisions. Doesn’t the Federal Government really have the final say, and if they want to allow something to some extent they can put stipulations on it. Federalism is here to stay.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics