In previous research, (Kiyonaga & Egner, 2014) stated that participants were less accurate on incongruent trials than congruent trials. This shows that majority of the participants struggled to name the incongruent word list, in which there was a faster reaction time on congruent world list (Eidels, 2012). (Hilbert, Nakagawa, Bindl, & Buhner, 2014) ) Also supported and gave an example …show more content…
This resulted to positive results that supported the hypothesis and at the same time answering the research question. Overall, it is related to the current study showing the results of the Stroop effect experiment in which there is a faster reaction time on congruent words than incongruent words. As the aim of this study is that: is the reaction time faster for congruent or incongruent condition and for which condition made less mistakes? Leading to the hypothesis: the reaction time was faster and less mistakes were made for congruent