Posner & Snyder (1975) had another theory that the Stroop effect might be due to a more automatic process (i.e. automaticity
Posner & Snyder (1975) had another theory that the Stroop effect might be due to a more automatic process (i.e. automaticity
The interference between the controlled and the automatic processes was observed in the Stroop effect type experiment using two different conditions. The original Stroop effect experiment concluded that the participants will find it more difficult to complete the reading task of the words related to colour meaning in comparison to the reading task of non-colour related words. The result of Stroop experiment supported the notion that control and automatic processes can obstruct each other in certain tasks. In the current experiment, the two conditions in reading task were modified to make them look more visually similar. The result indicated that despite of visual similarities, the automatic processes interfered with control processes due to the colour related properties of the words in Stroop condition.…
The purpose of the Stroop effect is to seek what interferes with our brain and to see how our brain processes the things we do.…
The aim of this study was to assess whether Stroop interference did indeed replicate with modern day students. Undergraduate students sample was obtained consisting of 12 females and 6 males, who are students in experimental psychology class. The independent variable was the condition of the stimuli with 3 levels (low, medium and high interference conditions). The dependable variable was the reaction time for the correct responses to the low, medium and high stimuli and the number of errors per condition. A one-way repeated ANOVA resulted in that there was a difference in reaction times and number of errors as the level of interference increased. ATukey’s HSD test found that there was a significant difference between the low and high interference levels and between the medium and high interference levels, as well. Also, there was no significant difference between the low and medium interference levels. That’s why the students didn’t replicate Stroop’s findings. There was a possibility that the sources of interference, like gender effect, auditory and visual distracters influenced the data.…
My science fair project was based on the Stroop Effect. The Stroop Effect was discovered by J. Ridley Stroop in the 1930’s. The Stroop Effect says that when you read a color word with the same ink as its color word, it will be recognized and be identified easily. When you read a color word with a different ink than its color word, it will not be recognized as easily. So you should be able to read the same color word with the same color ink faster than a color word with a different color ink. My purpose is to disprove the Stroop Effect so the question is, is the Stroop Effect true or not?…
This test combines many different parts of the brain together to test the full speed of the efferent and afferent pathways. This test not only involves the occipital lobe and motor cortex but also the frontal and temporal bone which are used more for interpreting. First for sorting the cards into two piles by colors, Subject 1, 2 and 3 had faster times than the average of 48.713 seconds. While subject 4,5 and 6 experienced slower times than the average. This is because again like the reaction ruler the subjects who had a faster time had faster pathways…
The stroop effect can be tested many different ways. John Ridley Stroop was the founder of the stroop effect in 1935. Some people came up with different ways to test the stroop effect. For males and females, the stroop effect can be different based on their perception of colors and their reaction times.…
This study looked at the Horse Race Model and whether it is the main reason for the presence of the Stroop effect. This study was conducted to test if the Horse Race Model is a valid reason for the Stroop effect as there has been some conflict in past research it seemed another study was needed.…
importance- better understanding of Atkinson and Shiffrin’s second stage, concentrates on the active processing of information in this intermediate stage.…
It was hypothesised that the data collected would replicate the Stroop Effect. Participants would experience interference when reading incongruent colour names. It was hypothesised that word pronounceability would have an impact on interference. The participant’s efforts to say the colour name correctly would have an impact on their time to complete the experiment. It was also hypothesised that slowing down the word recognition response would reduce the amount of…
In the classic Stroop task (MacLeod, 1991; Stroop, 1935), the names of colors are printed in the ink of another color (e.g., the word “green” printed in red ink). Participants are asked to read the word or name the ink color. This task has been a source of many important insights into adult cognition, attentional control mechanisms, and the neural bases of cognition. Its use with young children, however, has been limited by the requirement to be able to read (indeed, to be a well-practiced reader). We have circumvented that requirement by using simple line drawings of objects rather than words. As in the…
This study examined whether participant’s response times to global target were faster than local targets. Participants had to identify global and local shapes and letters as quick as possible and the response times which were recorded to the computer data. The study was a replication of Navon’s (1977), (cited in Ness Smith and Thirkettle, 2014) experiment but differed, as it was a focused attention task whereas this experiment was a divided attention task. This was the same as Yovel (2001), (cited in Ness, Smith and Thirkettle, 2014) mixed attention task study which tested the global to local accounts. The current experiment used a 2x2 repeated measures design, and all of the participants performed on all four conditions. Results showed that overall it took longer for participants to identify local stimuli compared to global stimuli.…
In the first experiment, the “Ss” were divided into two groups. Two types of stimuli were used on them: national names which were presented digitally through PowerPoint (CS names) and words which were presented orally by the instructors called “E” (US words). For the second stimulus, the “Ss” were required to repeat the word out loud immediately after “E” had pronounced it. Two tasks were first given to the “Ss.” The first task was to learn five visually presented national names, each shown four times in random order, and “Ss” were required to recall them in order to test their learning. The second task was to study 33 auditorily presented words. In order to test their learning, after repeating each word aloud after “E”, “Ss” were then presented 12 pairs of words and they were required to recognize which one of each pair had just been presented by…
Dyer,EN.(1973).The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual cognitive and response processes. Memory and Cognition, 1,106-120.…
The Stroop effect deals with the brain’s reaction when dealing with difficult or complex information. The brain’s competing functions are the cause of the delay or slow reaction time. Stroop relies on perception because of how the brain processes information from the environment by the senses. Due to the selective attention that occurs within people and the competing functions to process complex information, it usually takes a longer period of time for the participants to accurately identify between the two conditions of the color words. The replication of this experiment used Klopfer’s (1996)…
96 words were presented to the participants on a computer screen. These words (stimuli) were taken from Roediger and McDermott’s study in 1995, and were divided into eight different lists of twelve words. Roediger and McDermott, however, had six lists of sixteen words. The words in this study were not presented in lists as in Roediger and McDermotts study, but randomly divided into three groups. The order the words were presented in within these groups were also randomized, and differed from one participant to another.…