Preview

Study Drugs

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1259 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Study Drugs
Students in America want to perform well during their school time, so they have a chance of getting a scholarship at best universities in the country. A lot of young Americans spend all their nights preparing for exams, because they can’t do it in the afternoon due to their sports and social life. Therefore many a night are spend studying hard for exams, so the teacher will not fail them and by that prevent them from getting their dream education. However, this tight and packed schedule causes the young Americans to get really exhausted and overloaded, and later on it might even cause cases of stress. In the meantime, this complex of problems seems to have got a solution. A solution that is so effective that most people never would have imagined it. Unfortunately, there is yet a problem with the solution. Because the fact is that the solution is ‘study drugs’.
As David Sack clearly states in his blog article called: “Do 'Study Drugs ' Breed a Nation of Winners – or Cheaters?”, there are many consequences regarding this particular form of drug abuse. The ‘smart pill’ has invaded the American colleges and the students love it. But David Sack asks why? In his experience, the hopeful students, who we call leaders of tomorrow, have no problem using performance enhancing drugs to get higher grades, but using steroids at the gym is still seen as a felony among students. Really there’s a huge double standard of morality when talking about these ‘smart pills’. David Sack has learned that the young mouths speak: “Why work hard, stay up all night studying and still risk not doing well when you can pop a pill, get good grades, and make teachers, parents and coaches happy?”1 Of course this is a valid and agreeable argument, but at what price do these brilliant exam results come? David Sack is in the belief that cooperation should beat competition, and this is in spite of competition being taught to children in the busy society of ours. However, while the competition itself

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Use of anabolic steroids, like use of multi-vitamins, does not enable one to become a “Superathlete”. These drugs work, to the extent that they do, only when combined with hard work, dedication, persistence, and the exercise of other athletic virtues (Rosenthal, 2005). But if the nature of sports is that it is a competition to determine which athlete has developed his or her skills to the utmost, perhaps use of anabolic steroids frustrates such a determination, since the user/hard worker may have an unfair advantage over the mere hard worker (Quinn, 2005). Let's call this argument against the use of anabolic steroids the “Argument from Unfair Advantage”. The general form of this argument is the following: use of anabolic steroids gives the user an unfair advantage over non-users; therefore, use of them ought to be prohibited. A different reason to think that the premise is true is that, if use of anabolic steroids were allowed, athletes who would use them would have an advantage over those who would not. This might be true, but it does not itself tell us why that would be an unfair advantage. It is permissible in professional baseball for a pitcher to get daily massages in order to help his pitching arm muscles recover more quickly, and this pitcher has an advantage over another pitcher who, because of a lack of time, location or finances, cannot receive daily massages. But it is not clear why this fact alone means that the first athlete…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Moller's article We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals is showing how easy it is to choose success over rules. It brings in specific examples of when he was in high school he had the option to either get an F on his test or take Ritalin to help him focus and pass the test. The author chose to take the drug along with breaking the rules and law. He compared this to baseball players, how once the players get offered steroids it's obvious they will take them. They all want to be the best and taking these performance enhancing drugs will help them get there.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The writer, Moller, of the article “We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals.” believes that athletes using drugs despite the rules to win games is the same as students using drugs to boost their grades. This writer feels that people make more of a deal out of an athlete using drugs than students, because they are put on a pedestal. He uses his own experiences and those of theirs to try to prove his point. I think he is trying to open the minds of other to let them know that athletes using drugs and students using drugs to boost their performance is no different. He also goes on to imply how people can be very hypocritical when it comes to athletes and students using drugs.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In “We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals,” author William Moller presents his explanation for the widespread use of performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs). Moller begins by telling a story about his past experience with PEDs. During his sophomore year of high school, Moller was under immense pressure from himself and others to achieve a standard of excellence and secure the top spot in his class. After pulling three all-nighters in a row and forcing himself to stay awake for more studying, he willingly took a PED to improve his focus. It was easy for Moller to make the decision of being rewarded with a good test grade and risking the consequences of getting caught, instead of doing the right thing and falling to his competition.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reading the recent articles “We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals” by William Moller, and “Cheating and CHEATING” by Joe Posnanski, I found occasion to consider the use of steroids in baseball for the first time. In these essays, Moller and Posnanski tapped into the running commentary about performance-enhancing substances and their relative acceptability in the baseball arena (no pun intended). “We, the Public, Place the Best Athletes on Pedestals” proclaimed that “the entire steroid outcry is pure hypocrisy” (Moller, 2009, p.548), while Posnanski dared “baseball in Willie Mays’s time, like baseball in every time, was rife with cheating and racism and alcoholism and small-mindedness” (Posnanski, 2010, p.556). Both pieces seemed in agreement that substance use in baseball is par for the course, and I find it hard to believe otherwise, except in blatant denial of the facts. But this line of thinking extends out into a more global conversation about when it is acceptable to use drugs, and when it isn’t. Rather than arguing the morality of drug use or the ethics of enhancement, I feel the greater issue at hand is that athletes – and specifically baseball players – should take responsibility for the impact their drug use has on the American public.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard L. Worsnop offers multiple different points about high school sports and athletes. Concerns about the oppression of young athletes and debating if high school athletics “builds character”, are some of the main issues pointed out. Some coaches believe interscholastic sports competitions teach everything about character and teamwork, while others believe overemphasizing a win can teach the growth of negative character traits. Meanwhile, there are no doubts that certain drugs can enhance an athlete’s performance, but this can lead to injury and other harmful effects. High school athletes are sometimes considered, “dumb jocks”, which leads to the question if student athletes should maintain a certain grade-point average. Some players think…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without utilizing modern medicine, some argue, sports will never progress. Authors such as Ian Steadman defend the use of performance-enhancing drugs on the grounds that they are the future of sports. Being competitive and trying to outperform others has, and always…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As children, many people are introduced to the famous quote by late National Football League coach, Vince Lombardi, which is "winning isn 't everything; it 's the only thing" (Voy 204). Sports have always been about winning; however, some professional and amateur athletes take this simple saying too literally and it changes their outlook on their profession. As high school and even middle school athletes, they start to take drugs in order to be accepted, or to better their performance on the playing field (Louria n.pag). Once theses athletes reach the college level; they experiment, and are surrounded by even more drugs in order to get any advantage. It is not fair that one athlete can work hard in order to improve his performance, but then have another athlete improve more than him due to being wired on cocaine or bulked up on steroids. Also, Robert Voy states that drug use today is the biggest threat to the Olympics ideal, thus the Olympics and many other professional organizations are turning to drug testing. Testing is a huge controversy today because many believe that it violates one 's right of privacy; however, if there is no testing, many athletes will continue to have an unfair advantage to non drug users (180). Furthermore, it injures the user because it will result in mood changes, and it will hurt their health, if not immediately, then it will later on in their life. The chance of being caught using drugs is so small compared to the achievements one will have while using drugs which is so vast. No athlete should have an unfair advantage, these advantages only promote drug use, which many athletes believe it is a necessary means in today 's time. The only way to have the use of drugs decrease is to have mandatory drug testing across the board for all athletes.…

    • 2701 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Steroids in Sports Today

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The United State is a country that thrives on competition. We idolize our sports stars and practically make major athletic events holidays. Children grow up with their favorite athletes plastered to the wall of their bedrooms and dream that one day they will be the next Barry Bonds, Shaqullie O 'Neal, or Tom Brady. Professional athletes train year-round to be in ideal psychical shape in order to perform their best. But what happens when their best just isn 't good enough? We expect our sports stars to be perfect, upstanding citizens and role models but this isn 't always the case. The recent exposure of athletes using steroids has exploded into a phenomenon involving athletes all around the world. It has cheapened sports and cast doubt on the integrity of our athletes. Steroid use is not exclusive to professional sports. More and more college and high school athletes are beginning to use steroids for many of the same reasons that the pros do; to enhance performance, get an edge on the competition, and improve personal appearance.…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Performance enhancing drugs in sports has become a controversial issue in the world today, especially when it comes to athletes and people involved in it. These drugs are commonly known as PEDs (performance enhancing drugs) and people who use these drugs to enhance their performance consider it legitimate as it helps in improving their concentration level. Today's athletes continue to push the boundaries of distinction in performance and physical fitness. PEDs have been a go to source for these athletes, with more refined training methods and technologies. However from a social and ethical perspective, PEDs possess harmful threats to the consumer and those who compete with them. Athletes do not take these drugs to level the playing field, they do it to gain an unfair advantage…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He shows a study performed by the “University of Kentucky that shows 34% of undergraduate students have used study drugs illegally and that number is doubled with upperclassmen.” (638-639) He goes on to talk about how abusers of these drugs find this to be a victimless crime, while in actuality it is not. It is their peers that suffer from abusers’ inflated grades, which unfairly skew the grading curve and GPAs. This puts students who refrain from taking the drugs at an unfair disadvantage when it comes to earning grades. In closing he believes the best way to put an end to this raising epidemic would be to add the abuse of nonprescription drugs to the honor code. He feels this is the most balanced plan, putting little financial strain on universities and avoiding crossing any personal boundaries with random drug…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Un-Prescribed Study Drugs

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Students who take un-prescribed study drugs create an unfair advantage because there is inequitable accessibility to these medications among students. People with ADHD/ADD are able to obtain medications through prescriptions from their health care professional, but others are still able to obtain it non-prescribed through diversion. Diversion is the process in which people with a legal prescription for medications give it those without a prescription for non-therapeutic purposes (Vrecko, 1982). A study conducted by McCabe, Teter, & Boyd (2006) found that 54% of students with a medical prescription for stimulants have been approached to sell or give away their medications to those without a prescription. The division process to obtain non-prescribed…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Testing in Athletes

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many people do not see the severity of drug use in professional and High School athletics. Drug use in professional athletics is looked upon as somewhat of a serious problem, but also very discrete and low key. Every once in a while and individual might see a prominent figure in a certain sport being reprimanded for the use of an outlawed drug. However , that athlete may just be one of the many who happened to get caught. Athletes today seem to find no moral problem with using performance-enhancing drugs, or in other words, cheating. Athletes feel that because they are "stars" there should be no repercussions for their illegal activity. Today, drug use in sports has reached enormous proportions in society and destroying athletics from the ground up. The use of steroids and other performance enhancement drugs also effects athletes at the high school level. It does not matter how good the athlete is, a zero-tolerance policy should be in place at all levels of competition.…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Drug abuse is a major problem in our society as a whole and increasingly within our youth. In recent years, many school districts have implemented student athlete drug testing programs within their schools. Athletes were targeted because student athletics are voluntary and the "athletes are often held to higher standards than other students, keeping their grades up for example" (Tantillo, Wen & Morgo, 1995, p. A22).…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence by prestigious individuals claim to disprove the evidence presented by these “written self-reporting surveys”. In these self-supporting surveys, they claims that “58% reported that drug use by students decreased,” while in the other article, it states that “The first large-scale national study on student drug testing found no difference in rates of drug use between schools that have drug testing programs and those that do not.” Another example of this article disclaiming the effectiveness of drug testing is “Based on data collected between 1998 and 2001 from 76,000 students nationwide, in 8th, 10th, and 12th grades, the study found that drug testing did not have an impact on illicit drug use among students, including athletes.” One side of this argument seems to value the privacy and natural rights of the student, while the other side seems to value the safety of the student and developing good…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays