Succession Planning
The significance of succession planning to the success and continuity of business firms (Miller, 1993; Ocasio, 1999; Pitcher, Cherim, & Kisfalvi, 2000) more so for family businesses (Lee, Lim & Lim, 2003) is well known and therefore has been a thrust area of research. (Ramachandran, 2005)
Succession planning is all about finding the next leadership for the organization. The research on family owned enterprises found that the fundamental problem of family owned and run businesses is their ability to ensure competent family leadership across generations. (Le Breton-Miller, Miller, & Steier, 2004) The rate of survival of family businesses into the second and third generation has been about 30% and 10 to 15% respectively. (Birley,1986; Ward, 1987) The reasons attributed for the same are the smaller talent pool, complicating emotional factors between the incumbent and successor and complex social ties with the family. (Dyer, 1986; Lansberg, 1999; Miller, Steier, & Le Breton-Miller, 2003) The rate of survival and the reasons for successful survival of Indian family businesses is still a least deliberated topic. (Ramachandran, 2005)
Succession Planning appears to be one of the “Ten Commandments of Family Business” of Ramachandran (2005). The sustenance and growth of family owned businesses beyond two or three generations is not all that easy. Still many make it (Ramachandran, 2005) specifically, in the Indian context. Except for a few cases of failures, many Indian family businesses have seen more than two or three generations and more so in the case of Coimbatore region.
The Coimbatore Region
The geographical unit of Kongu Nadu of olden times comprised of present day, Periyar, Salem and parts of Madurai and Trichy districts. This part of the country was ruled mostly by tribal chieftains. The well known among them was an Irula,
References: Birley, S., 1986, Succession in the family firm: The inheritor’s view, Journal of Small Buisness Management, 24: (3), 36-43. Dyer, W.G., Jr., 1986, Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Lansberg, I., 1999, Succeeding generations: Realizing the dream of families in business, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, P. L., 2004, Toward an Integrative Model of Effective FOB Succession, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 1042-2587: 305-328. Lee, S. Khai., Lim, H. Guan., & Lim, S. Wei., 2003, Family business succession: Appropriate risk and choice of successor, Academy of Management Review, 28: 657-666. Mahadevan, Raman. 1999, The Southern Region in Footprints of Indian Business Through Ages, FICCI, Oxford University Press, Delhi, 113-133. Mahadevan, Raman. 1984, Entrepreneurship and Business Communities in Colonial Madras 1900-1929 Some Preliminary Observations, Tripathi, D. (Ed), Business Communities In Indai, Manohar Publications, New Delhi. Miller, D. 1993, Some organizational consequences of CEO succession, Academy of Management Journal, 36: 644-659. Miller, D., Steier, L., & Le Breton-Miller, I., 2003, Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change and failure in family, Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 513-531. Ocasio, W. 1999, Institutionalized action and corporate governance: The reliance on rules of CEO succession, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 384-416. Pitcher, P., Cherim, S., & Kisfalvi, V. 2000, CEO succession research: Methodological bridges over troubled waters, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 625-648. Ramachandran, K., 2005, Indian Family Businesses: Their Survival Beyond Three Generations, Working Paper Series, Indian School of Business, Hyderabdad. Ward, J.L., 1987, Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability and family leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.