Preview

Suetonius Battle Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
784 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Suetonius Battle Analysis
When Suetonius rapidly retreated from London, he was vulnerable to attack and his primary mission was to secure reinforcements for his own small force (Fraser 92). It is important to note that many of the specifics of the battle are at times unclear. There are accounts from two Roman historians (Dio and Tacitus) from the first century, which are inconsistent at times. They likely represented the battle from a biased Roman perspective and there is limited archaeological evidence to dispute their claims. An estimate of the number of united British rebels was approximately 230,000 by this time, but this is assumed an exaggeration by multiple contemporary reviews. Mustering a meager force of 10,000 Roman soldiers in total with the XIV Legion, …show more content…

She drove her chariot with her daughters amongst the ranks of her army exclaiming, “win this battle, or perish. That is what I, a woman, plan to do- let the men live in slavery if they will!” Her chariots opened the day’s battle by rushing back and forth, the warriors onboard shouting insults at the Roman soldiers and launching missiles towards them. Next were Boudicca’s war bands, which rushed up the narrowing defile. It is important to note that the Britons had to do all the running up the steep slope while the Romans stood silent and fast at the top of the hill (fields 75). They expected to easily slice the outnumbered enemy into pieces, but they were unnoticeably channeled into a tight pack (). The Romans had two great advantages on their side, they were much more skilled in the tactics and arts of battle and they also had the position on the defensive. Roman soldiers were accustomed to defending themselves while attacking fortified positions by forming up in a tight phalanx formation, the men positioned shoulder to shoulder, their shields creating one great continuous shield, a mobile walled fortification. Boudicca’s spear throwers, hurling their weapons uphill, were wholly ineffective. The spears that made contact with the Roman force bounced harmlessly off the impenetrable shield barrier. When Suetonius calculated that the first few waves of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle of Le Cateau was a war due to French and the British when they withdrew on the battle of Mons. They decided to play a revolutionary defensive tactic by setting up tones of barbwire compacted together so that the Germans were unable to get close to them. The battle of Cateau happened in France in Le Cateau-Cambrésis, which is roughly 200km away from Paris. The land which 7,812 lives were killed on was extremely flat and only had small hills. Due to the flat land, the war was an artillery war and not a rifle war unlike Battle of Mons. The 21st battalion was one of the groups that were fighting in this deadly battle; this battalion first fought on ANZAC cove and then was transported to the Western Front and Le Cateau-Cambrésis in particular.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In January the 17th of 1781 while Tarleton's men (Britain) attacked, Morgan (Colonies) instructed the militia to skirmish with Tarleton's men but to leave the front line open after firing a few rounds. The british mistook the repositioning of the Colonies as a rout and ran into an unexpected volley of aiming rifle fire with a cavalry charge and the militia showing up. The Tarleton escaped but Morgan's troops destroyed his army. In the end more than 800 of britain's troops were either captured or killed. The Americans suffered about 100 casualties in their first patriot victory to show they could outfight a similar british army without any other factors…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first theme I shall look at is military influence and might. Augustus’s Res Gestae says that he had around 500,000 Roman citizens bound to him by a military oath and that just over 300,000 soldiers/ veterans had been assigned lands or been given money for their dutiful service. The point here is that the soldiers are…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finally, the battle of Fort Necessity was almost finished when Fort Necessity was burned and the French moved back to Fort Duquesne on July 4. The battle of Fort Necessity helps the next generation understand deeply that Major George Washington got the value experiences and lessons from the failure of conducting the battle. Also, this battle has some negative effects such as the loss of military and the damage of nature. Therefore, it is considered as “the bloody battle” (Battle of Fort Necessity) which leads to the major result “French and Native American Victory” (Battle of Fort Necessity).…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thursday July 2nd - Union General Meade arrives to Gettysburg at midnight, Confederate General Lee orders two of his generals, James Longstreet and Ewell, to attack the flanks of Union soldiers on Culp's Hill. But Longstreet delays, and attacks much later than Ewell, giving Union army more time to fortify and strengthen their position. After that Union General Daniel Sickles and his forces advance to the front line and end up fighting, the clashing armies then end up fighting some of the fiercest battles (Little Round Top, The Devil’s Den, Peach Orchard, and the Wheatfield). Confederate General Ewell attacks Cemetery Hill and Culp’s Hill, but the Union armies hold their positions. Confederate General Robert E. Lee decides that on Friday he will attack where he will be least expected, the very center of the Union Line at Cemetery Ridge.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spartacus Film Analysis

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Romans would also give careful consideration to where the battle should be fought. The Roman commanders would like to try and get the higher ground when possible; and would also like to ensure that the sun and wind were behind their soldiers. Romans military were extremely good at siege tactics. Roman engineers developed several different devices that could throw stones and javelins long distances; the most important of these were the catapulta, ballista, ad onager.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Roman Emperor Augustus came to power in 27 BC it was after a period of civil war that lasted over 70 years following the death of Julius Caesar. Rome had 50 legions at this time, and number that would have put too great a financial strain on the Roman coffers. Augustus also feared for the loyalty of these legion due to the fact that many legionaries prior to the civil war had given their loyalty to the legion’s commander and not the state. During this time Augustus also limited Rome’s territorial ambitions choosing the secure its gains and to not expand it much further, thus making it more unmanageable both administratively and financially.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When examining events in the distant past, it is good to keep in mind that our frequently sparse and incomplete records were written by individuals who were often more interested in their current political situations than the actual facts . Such is undoubtedly the case with the authors of the only primary texts recording the events surrounding Boudicca’s rebellion: Tacitus and Cassius Dio. Tacitus, for example, was more interested in his political agenda when writing the Agricola than when writing the Annals . Writing 40-50 years after the rebellion, he likely had detailed knowledge of the facts since his father in law was a soldier serving in Roman Britain , but he went to pains to paint Boudicca as a character who almost uniquely stood up to the Emperor Nero . His account seems to be less focused on the actual events than it was on the political climate in Rome and the author’s opinion of women in leadership . Cassius Dio’s account is also questionable since he wrote it in the early 3rd century AD and the only remaining copy is an abbreviated version missing much of the original detail . Dio’s opinion of Boudicca is clear: he felt that Rome was shamed by the fact that a woman could wreak disaster in one of its provinces . The matter is further complicated by the fact that there is very little overlap in the works of the two…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Battle of Ia Drang Valley was a series of engagements between the U.S 1st Cavalry Division and the B-3 front, North Vietnamese Army. It was a battle between one US division and three NVA regiments. This was the first and last battle between NVA forces and U.S forces of similar size. This battle took place from 11-14-1965, thru 11-18-1965.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1860-1865, the U.S. was engaged in a Civil War between the North and the South. It was unprecedented in its use of photography to document the various aspects of war. This picture is the bloody battle of Antietam. The photo was taken by Alexander Gardner displaying the horrific tragedy that occurred at the battle of Antietam. Since the battle was declared over, now the battleground is a place to go and look around at the battlefield. It was a very hard fought battle on both sides, and each General had very good qualities that will be further explained in the body paragraphs below. Speaking of the body paragraphs, they will discuss the photo in more depth and detail about the very gruesome battle of Antietam. Also the articles that…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ralph Ellison’s, “Battle Royal” the protagonist is the narrator and the main character. He delivers the story to the reader in the form of a first person narrative. The narrator although black perceives himself as better than those of his race. His personality and the attitudes he exudes is exceedingly confident, blatantly arrogant and prideful. The reader is aware of this elevated sense of pride by observing the narrator’s actions/interactions with others and his thoughts.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Understanding the Battle of Waterloo is important to know, because it shows that bad decision making and bad intelligence reporting can lead to one's defeat. Since 1804, Napoleon was trying to create his own empire over Europe. He was defeated in 1805 by the British, but he continued to move forward across Europe before being forced to surrender. He returned to Paris in March 1815, prompting Britain, Prussia, Russia and Austria to declare war. Napoleon invaded Belgium in June, attempting to take over Brussels. He sent his men to engage Wellington, also sending a battalion against General Blucher's Prussian army. Blucher decided to retreat as Wellington's army wasn't holding the front line against Napoleon's army. A decisive battle is now set…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Artillery of the Potomac Army at Gettysburg, achieved victory through the “King of Battle” and integration of the Union maneuver commanders (Steve, 2014). Combat experience demonstrated seasoned leadership. The superiority of the Union artillery over their confederate counterparts was not only the number of guns employed, but also, it was the manner of how the Union commanders employed the artillery under their command (Steve, 2014). Proper integration of assets can determine the battlefield in moments. Hence, the concept of today’s utilization of artillery supporting the maneuver elements, has not drastically changed. (Steve, 2014)…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of June, 1863, the Confederate army began movement into Pennsylvania. Lee issued his first orders for the northern offensive on June 3rd, “breaking contact with Hooker’s Army of the Potomac near Fredericksburg” (Reardon, 2013). Lee’s forces moved through the Shenandoah Valley, using the Blue Ridge Mountains to conceal their movement into Pennsylvania. Lee used his cavalry Division, led by Maj. Gen. J.E.B. Stuart to screen the movement of the rest of the army as it passed over the Blue Ridge Mountains. After crossing the mountains, Gen. Lee ordered to clear the Shenandoah Valley of Union troops, providing a clear path into Pennsylvania. The screening provided by the cavalry was successful, and Gen. Hooker lost contact with the…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays