Preview

Sufficiency Of Effects Doctrine Under The United States And American Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
832 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sufficiency Of Effects Doctrine Under The United States And American Law
CHAPTER 2: EFFECTS DOCTRINE UNDER EU, US AND INDIAN LAWS. Under the Effects Doctrine, a State may assume jurisdiction when an act is committed in another State, by citizens or companies of other states, has effects in the former. This was accepted by the Permanent Court of International Justice in the S.S.Lotus case. Back in 1909, in the case of American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., all the acts complained of were committed outside the territory of the United States, including the defendant’s alleged inducements of the Costa Rican government to monopolize the banana trade, the US Supreme Court, categorically denied jurisdiction over the issue on the basis of the traditional territorial principle. The US has long applied the effects doctrine …show more content…
The sufficiency of effects doctrine is also contested. Under US legal system, the federal courts have jurisdiction over a defendant corporation if the corporation is incorporated or has its principal place of business in the state where the federal court sits. A court has general jurisdiction over a resident corporation if the corporation’s contacts with the forum state are “continuous and systematic”. In the case of United States v Nippon Paper , the Supreme Court repeated that jurisdiction can be exercised over ‘foreign conduct that was meant to produce and did in fact produce some substantial effect in the United States’. With regard to jurisdiction over foreign anti-trust defendants, the locus classicus in the US is Hartford Fire Insurance Co. case , wherein a number of states and a private plaintiff sued the defendant companies, alleging that the insurance companies had violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by conspiring to restrict the terms of coverage of commercial general liability insurance available in the United States. The court also clarified that “international comity” is …show more content…
Section 32 of the Competition Act of 2002 confers the powers over the Commission to inquire into the agreement referred in Section 3 that have been entered into outside India which have an appreciable adverse effect on the competition in the relevant market in India. This Section empowers the Commission to take jurisdiction over disputes taking place outside India if it produces an adverse effect within its territory. The mechanism for controlling anti-competitive acts carried on by persons having the location of their operations at some place in India and are, therefore, directly subject to the territorial jurisdiction of Indian courts and tribunals. Thus, it is an evident inference that where there is conduct within the country and such a conduct causes an appreciable adverse effect within the market of that country, then the Commission positively has jurisdiction to decide such cases. Also, Section 14 of the MRTP Act stated that “Where any practice substantially follows within monopolistic, restrictive, or unfair, trade practice relating to the production, storage, supply, distribution or control of goods of any description or the provision of any services and any party to such practice does not carry on business in India, an order may be made under this Act, with respect to that part of the practice which is carried on in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    PA110 Complaint Form 1

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of the State of Missouri and the defendant is a citizen of the State of Illinois and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs.…

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Funny Face Case Study

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Generally, this power only covers a specific geographic region. For example in the state court system, a court's in personam jurisdiction usually extends to the state's borders, whereas a federal court exerts power over a greater area (Kubasek, Browne, Giampetro-Meyer, Barkacs, Herron, Williamson, & Dhooge, 2011). Because this case involves multiple parties from multiple geographic areas, the statutes regarding in personam jurisdiction must be scrutinized for all three states involved (New York, California, and Florida) before a venue may be decided upon.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Con Law Outline

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Art III § 2 spells out the Federal Court’s subject matter jurisdiction. The claim must be within this section to be in Federal Jurisidction.…

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    TCPA 227

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This Court has federal question subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s TCPA claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Mims v. Arrow Fin. Ser., Inc., 132 S.Ct. 740 (2012).…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alien Tort Statute (ATS)

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Second Circuit has noted that, “customary international law has not to date recognized liability for corporations that violate its norms . . . [and] no international tribunal has ever held a corporation liable.” Conversely, the Ninth Circuit has held that corporations can be liable under the ATS. To discern if a customary international law exists the Ninth Circuit considers whether the offense in question is “limited to states and whether its application depends on the identity of the perpetrator.” In Doe v. Nestle USA, Inc, the court concluded that “ the prohibition against slavery is universal and may be asserted against the corporate defendants . . . [because] non-state actors were held liable at Nuremberg for slavery offenses.”…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gideon's Trumpet

    • 4806 Words
    • 20 Pages

    In this chapter the issue at hand involves the jurisdiction of the federal and state courts. What the Supreme Court can and cannot do. It is explained that the reach is limited to only federal laws. Stating that when a state has decided that a person acted in a way that violates state…

    • 4806 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Competition Act Case

    • 2379 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In a telling judgement, the Supreme Court of India, on Sep. 9, 2010, has effectively and judiciously circumscribed the boundaries of exercise of power by both the Competition Commission of India (CCI/Commission) and the Competition Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) while delivering its verdict in the much awaited case Competition Commission of India v. Steel Authority of India Ltd. This Note captures the highlights of the decision for readers of this Blog!…

    • 2379 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This throws up the risk that a foreign company’s business rules, policies and processes that may have been working successfully elsewhere may be quite misaligned to the local needs in India. In many cases, even the business model needs adjustments to meet local market requirements.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Extent: The application of the doctrine to a particular case does not deny the corporation of legal personality for any and all purposes, but only for the particular transaction or instance for which the doctrine was applied (Koppel v. Yatco 77 Phil. 496)…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    INDIAN BARE ACTS THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 No.26 of 1996 [16th August, 1996] An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to domestic arbitration, international commercial arbitration and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards as also to define the law relating to conciliation and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. WHEREAS the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) has adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration in 1985: AND WHEREAS the General Assembly of the United Nations has recommended that all countries give due consideration to the said Model Law, in view of the desirability of uniformity of the law of arbitral procedures and the specific needs of international commercial arbitration practice; AND WHEREAS the UNCITRAL has adopted the UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules in 1980; AND WHEREAS the General Assembly of the United Nations has recommended the use of the said Rules in cases where a dispute arises in the context of international commercial relations and the parties seek an amicable settlement of that dispute by recourse to conciliation; AND WHEREAS the said Model Law and Rules make significant contribution to the establishment of a unified legal framework for the fair and efficient settlement of disputes arising in international commercial relations; AND WHEREAS it is expedient to make law respecting arbitration and conciliation, taking into account the aforesaid Model Law and Rules; BE it enacted by Parliament in the Forty-seventh Year of the Republic of India as follows:PRELIMINARY 1.Short title, extent and commencement.- (1) This Act may be called the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. (2) It extends to the whole of India: Provided that Parts, I, III and IV shall extend to the State of Jammu and Kashmir only in so far as they relate to international commercial arbitration or, as the case may be, international commercial conciliation. Explanation.- In this…

    • 16553 Words
    • 67 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Swot Og Frito Lay

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * The government is very strict about the regulation for the foreign firms, India has high barriers mode of entry into the…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charan Singh Case

    • 8918 Words
    • 36 Pages

    This appeal under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is directed against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter the "National Consumer Forum") dated 9th August, 1999 dismissing a complaint filed by the appellant, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, but granting liberty to the appellant to "make a realistic claim" and move the State Commission or the District Forum, as the case may be in accordance with law. The National Consumer Forum 1…

    • 8918 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nlsir Concept Note

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages

    MAPPING THE FUTURE OF COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION IN INDIA The last three years have witnessed dynamic shifts in the law and practice of Arbitration in India. While there have been steps in the right direction, an unwieldy system continues to weigh down practitioners. Four years after first delving into the nuances of commercial arbitration in India, the NLSIR Symposium (now in its sixth edition) hopes to assess the development of Arbitration Law over the last few years. Day One focuses on the judiciary and its reading of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Day Two focuses on the structural changes needed in the Indian system, for dealing with matters under the 1996 Act as well as under Bilateral Investment Treaties. Session I: The Implications of BALCO on Arbitration Practice On the 6th of September 2012, the Supreme Court delivered its much-awaited verdict in Bharat Aluminium v. Kaiser Aluminium. The decision was widely lauded and, in the eyes of most commentators, set right the perceived wrongs of Bhatia International and Venture Global. However, the impact of this decision is yet to be discussed in detail. The first session of the Symposium focuses on four specific questions arising out of the judgment. First, it may be observed that Justice Nijjar’s opinion looks beyond merely a harmonious construction of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court deemed it “necessary to analyse the text of the Arbitration Act, 1996 with reference to its legislative history and international conventions”. Consequently, the Court notes the Act’s moorings in the UNCITRAL Model Law and the principle of territoriality embedded therein. Interestingly, the text of s. 28 and s. 45 of the Act both seem to suggest that the territorial basis of the Act may not be absolute. Was the Supreme Court’s decision justified in light of the text of the statute? Second, the Court veered away from treating s. 9 as sui generis. The primary impact of such a move…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rivalry in which every seller tries to get what other sellers are seeking at the…

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As you would recall, the MRTP Act was a grim reminder of the “licence-quota- permit-raj” of 1970’s & 1980’s. The Act had become redundant post July 1991 when the new economic policy was announced and Chapter III of the MRTP Act dealing with restrictions on M&A activities was made inoperative. The MRTP Commission will continue to handle all the old cases filed prior to September 1, 2009 for a period of 2 years. It will, however, not entertain any new cases from now onwards.…

    • 3121 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays