Preview

Summary: Boston Tea Party Was Act Of Terrorism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
296 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: Boston Tea Party Was Act Of Terrorism
In reference to your point about the Revolutionaries, I was actually discussing this with my sister a few days ago. Technically speaking, Revolutionaries can be considered terrorists--they tried to instill fear in the British government (for example, the Boston Tea Party) for political purposes (specifically protesting taxation). In fact, according to an article titled, "Boston Tea Party Was Act Of Terrorism? Texas Public Schools Teaching New History Lesson," some schools in Texas are even examining it as such. Specifically, teachers are instructed to read the following prompt to their students:

"News report: New Act of Terrorism
A local militia, believed to be a terrorist organization, attacked the property of private citizens today at our nation’s busiest port. Although no one was injured in the attack, a large quantity of merchandise, considered to be valuable to its owners and loathsome to the perpetrators, was destroyed. The terrorists, dressed in disguise and apparently intoxicated, were able to escape into the night with the help of local citizens who harbor these fugitives and conceal their identities from the authorities. It is believed that the terrorist attack was a response to the policies enacted by the occupying country’s government. Even stronger policies are anticipated by the local citizens." ("Boston Tea Party Was Act of Terrorism?").
…show more content…
However, it appears as if many Americans insist that the Revolutionaries were patriots and not terrorists. But, when does patriotism go too far? Furthermore, are we currently so in denial because of the sensitivity associated with terrorism following September 11th (that is, we deny this label because we don't want to be in the same category as others who we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On the night of December 16, 1773, a band of Bostonians dressed as Native Americans boarded the British merchant ship Dartmouth and two other companion vessels anchored at “Griffin's Wharf” in Boston harbor. The Americans who had around 70 men, all hated the tea tax.There mission to destroy all the cargo of British East India Company tea. Many years later George Hewes shoemaker and participant in the Boston tea party. He remembered "We then were ordered by our commander to open the hatches and take out all the chests of tea and throw them overboard. And we immediately proceeded to execute his orders, first cutting and splitting the chests with our tomahawks, so as thoroughly to expose them to the effects of the water." Urged on by a crowd of cheering townspeople. The Bostonians destroyed 342 chests of tea estimated to be worth between 10,000 and 18,000 in their currency. This event became known as the Boston Tea Party that pushed us towards the American Revolution.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boston's Tea Party

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page

    An event that took place on December 16, 1773. It was a protest to the British Parliament’s Tea Act of 1773. It was a bill designed to save the East India Company by greatly lowering its tea tax and raising the tea prices on Americans. The low tax allowed the East India Company to undercut tea smuggling into America to Dutch traders. Many colonists viewed this act as taxation tyranny. For the tea party, the colonists disguised themselves as Mohawk Indians.They boarded three British tea ships and dumped 342 chests of tea into the Boston Harbor. The three ships were the Dartmouth, the Eleanor, and the Beaver. As a result of the Boston Tea Party, the Coercive Acts were established by King George III. This led to the closure of importing and exporting…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Boston Tea Party occurred on a winter night of Thursday, December 16, 1773. It was a pre-revolutionary event of a direct protest that the colonialists used the tea tax that was levied by the British government. The Boston party resulted due to the resentment that the British colonialist had towards the Boston colonists. During the event, the Patriots were dressed as Mohawk Indians and attacked the British ships in the Boston harbor. After raiding the three ships, the Patriots dumped 342 containers of tea into the harbor. The group of Patriots, who were also called the Sons of Liberty, organized the incident and was led by Samuel Adams. It was composed of males from all the parts of the colonial society ('Boston Tea Party').…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre was an unfortunate event which could have clearly been prevented if taken the right precautions and made the right decisions at the right time. According to my text book, the massacre was an attempt at protest against the British soldiers taking over the colonists’ jobs. If the soldiers had followed instructions, if Britain had paid the soldiers more, and if Crispus Attucks had taken a more peaceful approach to this problem, things might’ve gone differently.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of Boston wanted to be free of British control so badly that they resorted to violence and initiated a fight with the soldiers. This caused those soldiers to fear for their lives and fire at the rioters. Some may say that the soldiers were at fault because they were the ones to fire a gun first, but they were only protecting themselves and their peers, who were being attacked by a mob. However, despite this evidence, March 5th, 1770 will forever be remembered as a massacre, not an act of self-defense, because only victors write history and the Americans were the winners of this…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Tea Party Analysis

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Access the Week Four Electronic Reserve Readings located under the materials section of your student website.…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Samuel Adams once said, “It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.”…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although they are closely related in meaning, terrorist and revolutionary differ in their connotations. Terrorist describes a person who uses violence for political aims, and the word is often used by the American government to describe foreign-born men and women who oppose the American people. Revolutionary describes a person who is engaged in or promotes a political revolution, and the word is used daily to describe a drastic change.…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term terrorism is defined as “the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes; the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization; a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.”(Dictionary.com). The huge debate is whether the colonists of the American Revolutions were actually patriots, or terrorists. If one was to go by this definition then yes, I believe that the colonists could be considered terrorists. However, while I agree with everything the definition gives, I believe that terrorism is more than this. From what I see with the terrorism that goes on today, the main goal of a terrorist is fear. They strive to instill fear in their enemies, and to kill them. The goal of the colonists was not to make the British fear them, or to kill as many British citizens as possible. Their goal was to defend their rights and their growing country. Both of these things characterize a patriot, which is what they truly were. Based on what I believe a true terrorist is, not what the dictionary defines it as; I do not think that the men and women who fought against the British in the American Revolution were Terrorists, but true patriots.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boston Massacre was when a group of colonists came in a mob and taunted British soldiers. One of them panicked and shot at the people. The rest of the people panicked too so they all shot at the colonists. There were 5 people dead including a man who was half African American and half Native American. His name was Crispus Attucks. Paul Revere heard of it and made a picture making the British look really bad to everyone. The cause, the effects, and the people involved were all important to the American Revolution.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Brown Rape

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is no complete or certain definition of terrorism, which makes it hard to identify somebody by their action. Terrorism isn’t always about killing people, but in John Brown’s perspective, violence solved everything. Browns actions at Pottawatomie Creek and Harpers Ferry justify him as a terrorist.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Idiot Peasant

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Somehow these peasants have made us look like the villains in the tragic event they call the “Boston Massacre.” Hey that is one way to put it, but truly they are the ones to be blamed in this whole bloody mess. The idiots started it by harassing some of our own sovereign…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Tea Party is typically viewed as one of the most popular, well-known events of the Revolutionary War. The Boston Tea Party occurred on the night of December 17, 1773. The colonists were fed up with Britain taxing them and trying to regain control. The Boston Tea Party was a direct response to the Tea Act, an act created to save the East India Tea company, left the colonists paying very high taxes on tea. Many people drank tea and enjoyed it very much so it left many of the colonists upset and angry.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boston Massacre

    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page

    One thing people have a right to do is respond to an attack against them that might put them in risk of physical harm. It has been shown that the British were being attacked and put in a situation that if they did not respond to could lead to their deaths. However, who really started the fight that lead to the Boston Massacre? Once again, American bias has led many modern-day Americans to believe that it was Captain Preston and his British soldiers taunting colonists, or making despising comments. However, this can be proven false. Taken from a primary source document, we see that it was again the unruly colonists that are the cause of the conflict, “the rope-makers insultingly asked them if they would empty a vault. This unfortunately had the desired effect by provoking the soldiers, and from words they went to blows. Both parties suffered in this afftay, and finally the soldiers retired to their quarters. The officers, on the first knowledge of this transaction, took every precaution in their power to prevent any ill consequence. Notwithstanding which, single quarrels could not be prevented, the inhabitants constantly provoking and abusing the soldiery. The insolence as well as utter hatred of the inhabitants to the troops increased daily, insomuch that Monday and Tuesday, the 5th and 6th instant, were privately agreed on for a general engagement, in consequence of which several of the militia came from the country armed to join their friends, menacing to destroy any who should oppose them. This plan has since been discovered”.…

    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many historians believe that the pre-Civil War antislavery activist John Brown would be considered the first American domestic terrorist. Terrorism is defined as using fear through violence to achieve a goal, especially for political purposes. It is obvious that Brown had these qualities. Even before coming into light as an antislavery extremist he had an incident at his home where he barricaded himself and two of his sons with muskets to avoid losing the home. In this example no shots were fired, but this would not be the case in the future. After a string of failures in the work force, Brown began having fantasies about being “God’s messenger, a latter-day Moses who would lead his people from the accursed house of slavery.” (Pg. 355) He began working in the Underground Railroad and giving public sermons about abolishing slavery by any means. But it wasn’t until the Pottawatomie Massacre that Brown could have been dubbed a terrorist. This and Harpers Ferry were the two major acts that history remembers John Brown for. These actions would classify Brown as a domestic terrorist during the pre-Civil War era. But of course he was not the only one, and he diffidently wasn’t the first. There are accounts of American domestic terrorism stretching all the way back to the American Revolution. Even in his own time, John Brown cannot be rightly classified as the Father of American Terrorism. There were others like Nat Turner, Thomas Higginson, and even Preston Brooks could have all been considered American terrorists. Many of these people used their connection with God as reasoning for their actions, just as Brown did. So this would classify Brown as a terrorist, but not necessarily the Father of American Terrorism…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays